Searching and sourcing online academic literature: Comparisons of doctoral students and junior faculty in education

Ching Ting Hsin, Ying Hsueh Cheng, Chin Chung Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore educational researchers' online literature searching and sourcing strategies. Design/methodology/approach - Adopting a multiple-case study approach, the authors conducted interviews and compared strategies employed by three groups of researchers: less-experienced doctoral students, experienced doctoral students, and junior faculty. Findings - The results showed that the three groups differed in four searching strategies and two sourcing strategies. The former included: using and modifying keywords, doing advanced searches to narrow down or expand results, chaining, and networking to retrieve literature, while the latter consisted of: evaluating and selecting multiple-source articles, and self-monitoring the multiple-source searching process. The findings also revealed that the experienced doctoral students and junior faculty were able to adopt searching and sourcing strategies flexibly and simultaneously for the purpose of determining more relevant and useful sources. The findings suggest that these researchers, especially the less-experienced students, need specialized training to acquire sourcing strategies in order to critically evaluate relevant information or scholarly work to fulfill their research purposes. Originality/value - Information seeking, an essential part of scholars' work, has been widely examined across disciplines. However, few studies have explored scholars' searching and sourcing behaviors for online academic literature. This study fulfilled the research gap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)979-997
Number of pages19
JournalOnline Information Review
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Education
Students
education
student
Online searching
networking
literature
Monitoring
Group
monitoring
methodology
interview
Values

Keywords

  • Expert
  • Information retrieval
  • Information seeking
  • Novice
  • Online academic literature
  • Sourcing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Searching and sourcing online academic literature : Comparisons of doctoral students and junior faculty in education. / Hsin, Ching Ting; Cheng, Ying Hsueh; Tsai, Chin Chung.

In: Online Information Review, Vol. 40, No. 7, 01.01.2016, p. 979-997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c27a09cf5e1454cbec22df6491a3a59,
title = "Searching and sourcing online academic literature: Comparisons of doctoral students and junior faculty in education",
abstract = "Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore educational researchers' online literature searching and sourcing strategies. Design/methodology/approach - Adopting a multiple-case study approach, the authors conducted interviews and compared strategies employed by three groups of researchers: less-experienced doctoral students, experienced doctoral students, and junior faculty. Findings - The results showed that the three groups differed in four searching strategies and two sourcing strategies. The former included: using and modifying keywords, doing advanced searches to narrow down or expand results, chaining, and networking to retrieve literature, while the latter consisted of: evaluating and selecting multiple-source articles, and self-monitoring the multiple-source searching process. The findings also revealed that the experienced doctoral students and junior faculty were able to adopt searching and sourcing strategies flexibly and simultaneously for the purpose of determining more relevant and useful sources. The findings suggest that these researchers, especially the less-experienced students, need specialized training to acquire sourcing strategies in order to critically evaluate relevant information or scholarly work to fulfill their research purposes. Originality/value - Information seeking, an essential part of scholars' work, has been widely examined across disciplines. However, few studies have explored scholars' searching and sourcing behaviors for online academic literature. This study fulfilled the research gap.",
keywords = "Expert, Information retrieval, Information seeking, Novice, Online academic literature, Sourcing",
author = "Hsin, {Ching Ting} and Cheng, {Ying Hsueh} and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0354",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "979--997",
journal = "Online Information Review",
issn = "1468-4527",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Searching and sourcing online academic literature

T2 - Comparisons of doctoral students and junior faculty in education

AU - Hsin, Ching Ting

AU - Cheng, Ying Hsueh

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore educational researchers' online literature searching and sourcing strategies. Design/methodology/approach - Adopting a multiple-case study approach, the authors conducted interviews and compared strategies employed by three groups of researchers: less-experienced doctoral students, experienced doctoral students, and junior faculty. Findings - The results showed that the three groups differed in four searching strategies and two sourcing strategies. The former included: using and modifying keywords, doing advanced searches to narrow down or expand results, chaining, and networking to retrieve literature, while the latter consisted of: evaluating and selecting multiple-source articles, and self-monitoring the multiple-source searching process. The findings also revealed that the experienced doctoral students and junior faculty were able to adopt searching and sourcing strategies flexibly and simultaneously for the purpose of determining more relevant and useful sources. The findings suggest that these researchers, especially the less-experienced students, need specialized training to acquire sourcing strategies in order to critically evaluate relevant information or scholarly work to fulfill their research purposes. Originality/value - Information seeking, an essential part of scholars' work, has been widely examined across disciplines. However, few studies have explored scholars' searching and sourcing behaviors for online academic literature. This study fulfilled the research gap.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore educational researchers' online literature searching and sourcing strategies. Design/methodology/approach - Adopting a multiple-case study approach, the authors conducted interviews and compared strategies employed by three groups of researchers: less-experienced doctoral students, experienced doctoral students, and junior faculty. Findings - The results showed that the three groups differed in four searching strategies and two sourcing strategies. The former included: using and modifying keywords, doing advanced searches to narrow down or expand results, chaining, and networking to retrieve literature, while the latter consisted of: evaluating and selecting multiple-source articles, and self-monitoring the multiple-source searching process. The findings also revealed that the experienced doctoral students and junior faculty were able to adopt searching and sourcing strategies flexibly and simultaneously for the purpose of determining more relevant and useful sources. The findings suggest that these researchers, especially the less-experienced students, need specialized training to acquire sourcing strategies in order to critically evaluate relevant information or scholarly work to fulfill their research purposes. Originality/value - Information seeking, an essential part of scholars' work, has been widely examined across disciplines. However, few studies have explored scholars' searching and sourcing behaviors for online academic literature. This study fulfilled the research gap.

KW - Expert

KW - Information retrieval

KW - Information seeking

KW - Novice

KW - Online academic literature

KW - Sourcing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994338452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994338452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0354

DO - 10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0354

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994338452

VL - 40

SP - 979

EP - 997

JO - Online Information Review

JF - Online Information Review

SN - 1468-4527

IS - 7

ER -