Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach

Tsung Hau Jen, Yi Fen Yeh, Ying Shao Hsu, Hsin Kai Wu, Kuan Ming Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-P) refers to the knowledge construct that teachers in the digital era develop for and from their teaching practices with technology. This study explored a standard-setting method using item response theory to cross-validate ranks of proficiency levels and examine in-service and pre-service science teachers' knowledge about and application of TPACK-P in Taiwan. A sample of 99 participants (52 pre-service and 47 in-service science teachers) completed a 17-item TPACK-P questionnaire that described their typical responses, opinions, or actions in different instructional scenarios. Initial analysis of these responses revealed a correlation (r = 0.87) between the ranks of proficiency levels and those previously identified that validated the hierarchical structure of the four proficiency levels (1-lack of use, 2-simple adoption, 3-infusive application, and 4-reflective application). The second analysis located the thresholds of the four proficiency levels in the two dimensions of knowledge about and application of TPACK-P. It was found that there were no significant differences between in-service and pre-service teachers' TPACK-P and that most of the participants displayed knowledge about TPACK-P at Levels 2 and 3, but their application was at Level 1. The validated four proficiency levels coupled with typical performances can be viewed as a roadmap of science teachers' TPACK-P development. The gap between the knowledge about and application of TPACK-P suggests that further practical experiences in supportive environments are needed in science teacher education programs. Only when teachers gain and learn from practical usage of technology to support science education can their TPACK-P be further developed and strengthened.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-62
Number of pages18
JournalComputers and Education
Volume95
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Apr

Fingerprint

teacher
science
evidence
Education
Teaching
teaching practice
Taiwan
education
scenario
questionnaire
lack
performance
experience

Keywords

  • Evaluation methodologies
  • Improving classroom teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Science teachers' TPACK-Practical : Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. / Jen, Tsung Hau; Yeh, Yi Fen; Hsu, Ying Shao; Wu, Hsin Kai; Chen, Kuan Ming.

In: Computers and Education, Vol. 95, 04.2016, p. 45-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b29bb858bab141cdac6000295b938138,
title = "Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach",
abstract = "Technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-P) refers to the knowledge construct that teachers in the digital era develop for and from their teaching practices with technology. This study explored a standard-setting method using item response theory to cross-validate ranks of proficiency levels and examine in-service and pre-service science teachers' knowledge about and application of TPACK-P in Taiwan. A sample of 99 participants (52 pre-service and 47 in-service science teachers) completed a 17-item TPACK-P questionnaire that described their typical responses, opinions, or actions in different instructional scenarios. Initial analysis of these responses revealed a correlation (r = 0.87) between the ranks of proficiency levels and those previously identified that validated the hierarchical structure of the four proficiency levels (1-lack of use, 2-simple adoption, 3-infusive application, and 4-reflective application). The second analysis located the thresholds of the four proficiency levels in the two dimensions of knowledge about and application of TPACK-P. It was found that there were no significant differences between in-service and pre-service teachers' TPACK-P and that most of the participants displayed knowledge about TPACK-P at Levels 2 and 3, but their application was at Level 1. The validated four proficiency levels coupled with typical performances can be viewed as a roadmap of science teachers' TPACK-P development. The gap between the knowledge about and application of TPACK-P suggests that further practical experiences in supportive environments are needed in science teacher education programs. Only when teachers gain and learn from practical usage of technology to support science education can their TPACK-P be further developed and strengthened.",
keywords = "Evaluation methodologies, Improving classroom teaching",
author = "Jen, {Tsung Hau} and Yeh, {Yi Fen} and Hsu, {Ying Shao} and Wu, {Hsin Kai} and Chen, {Kuan Ming}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "45--62",
journal = "Computers and Education",
issn = "0360-1315",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science teachers' TPACK-Practical

T2 - Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach

AU - Jen, Tsung Hau

AU - Yeh, Yi Fen

AU - Hsu, Ying Shao

AU - Wu, Hsin Kai

AU - Chen, Kuan Ming

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - Technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-P) refers to the knowledge construct that teachers in the digital era develop for and from their teaching practices with technology. This study explored a standard-setting method using item response theory to cross-validate ranks of proficiency levels and examine in-service and pre-service science teachers' knowledge about and application of TPACK-P in Taiwan. A sample of 99 participants (52 pre-service and 47 in-service science teachers) completed a 17-item TPACK-P questionnaire that described their typical responses, opinions, or actions in different instructional scenarios. Initial analysis of these responses revealed a correlation (r = 0.87) between the ranks of proficiency levels and those previously identified that validated the hierarchical structure of the four proficiency levels (1-lack of use, 2-simple adoption, 3-infusive application, and 4-reflective application). The second analysis located the thresholds of the four proficiency levels in the two dimensions of knowledge about and application of TPACK-P. It was found that there were no significant differences between in-service and pre-service teachers' TPACK-P and that most of the participants displayed knowledge about TPACK-P at Levels 2 and 3, but their application was at Level 1. The validated four proficiency levels coupled with typical performances can be viewed as a roadmap of science teachers' TPACK-P development. The gap between the knowledge about and application of TPACK-P suggests that further practical experiences in supportive environments are needed in science teacher education programs. Only when teachers gain and learn from practical usage of technology to support science education can their TPACK-P be further developed and strengthened.

AB - Technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-P) refers to the knowledge construct that teachers in the digital era develop for and from their teaching practices with technology. This study explored a standard-setting method using item response theory to cross-validate ranks of proficiency levels and examine in-service and pre-service science teachers' knowledge about and application of TPACK-P in Taiwan. A sample of 99 participants (52 pre-service and 47 in-service science teachers) completed a 17-item TPACK-P questionnaire that described their typical responses, opinions, or actions in different instructional scenarios. Initial analysis of these responses revealed a correlation (r = 0.87) between the ranks of proficiency levels and those previously identified that validated the hierarchical structure of the four proficiency levels (1-lack of use, 2-simple adoption, 3-infusive application, and 4-reflective application). The second analysis located the thresholds of the four proficiency levels in the two dimensions of knowledge about and application of TPACK-P. It was found that there were no significant differences between in-service and pre-service teachers' TPACK-P and that most of the participants displayed knowledge about TPACK-P at Levels 2 and 3, but their application was at Level 1. The validated four proficiency levels coupled with typical performances can be viewed as a roadmap of science teachers' TPACK-P development. The gap between the knowledge about and application of TPACK-P suggests that further practical experiences in supportive environments are needed in science teacher education programs. Only when teachers gain and learn from practical usage of technology to support science education can their TPACK-P be further developed and strengthened.

KW - Evaluation methodologies

KW - Improving classroom teaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953791265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953791265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009

DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953791265

VL - 95

SP - 45

EP - 62

JO - Computers and Education

JF - Computers and Education

SN - 0360-1315

ER -