TY - JOUR
T1 - Revealing the absence of carbon in aprotic Li-CO2batteries
T2 - A mechanism study toward CO2reduction under a pure CO2environment
AU - Iputera, Kevin
AU - Huang, Jheng Yi
AU - Haw, Shu Chih
AU - Chen, Jin Ming
AU - Hu, Shu Fen
AU - Liu, Ru Shi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2022/2/21
Y1 - 2022/2/21
N2 - While attention is focused on Li-CO2 batteries due to their high energy density and ability to utilize carbon, their detailed cathodic reaction mechanism remains unclear. Thus far, the recognized reaction formula involves CO2 reduction with carbon as the reduced product (3CO2 + 4Li+ + 4e- → 2Li2CO3 + C, E° = 2.8 V vs. Li+/Li). However, evidence of carbon formation is seldom provided in previous studies. The potential of the potential-determining step (CO2 + e- → CO2-, E° = 1.1 V vs. Li+/Li) in the reaction is much lower than the common working potential (2.6 V). Furthermore, the calculated redox potential at 2.8 V itself is incorrect since the calculation includes chemical reaction(s) that does not involve electron transfer. These findings do not suggest that the proposed cell reaction is correct. Herein, we propose that the previously observed reaction is caused by O2 and H2O participating in the electrochemical reaction to give such a high working potential. The formation of Li2CO3 as the only discharge product can support our statement through examination by soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Moreover, we find that the reaction of sole CO2 reduction can only happen at a low potential of 1.1 V with a current density of 100 mA g-1. CO, rather than C, is found to be the discharge product. Thus, both O2 and H2O contamination should be considered when studying Li-CO2 batteries, and the discharge product should be characterized carefully to claim the reaction formula.
AB - While attention is focused on Li-CO2 batteries due to their high energy density and ability to utilize carbon, their detailed cathodic reaction mechanism remains unclear. Thus far, the recognized reaction formula involves CO2 reduction with carbon as the reduced product (3CO2 + 4Li+ + 4e- → 2Li2CO3 + C, E° = 2.8 V vs. Li+/Li). However, evidence of carbon formation is seldom provided in previous studies. The potential of the potential-determining step (CO2 + e- → CO2-, E° = 1.1 V vs. Li+/Li) in the reaction is much lower than the common working potential (2.6 V). Furthermore, the calculated redox potential at 2.8 V itself is incorrect since the calculation includes chemical reaction(s) that does not involve electron transfer. These findings do not suggest that the proposed cell reaction is correct. Herein, we propose that the previously observed reaction is caused by O2 and H2O participating in the electrochemical reaction to give such a high working potential. The formation of Li2CO3 as the only discharge product can support our statement through examination by soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Moreover, we find that the reaction of sole CO2 reduction can only happen at a low potential of 1.1 V with a current density of 100 mA g-1. CO, rather than C, is found to be the discharge product. Thus, both O2 and H2O contamination should be considered when studying Li-CO2 batteries, and the discharge product should be characterized carefully to claim the reaction formula.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124938194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124938194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/d1ta08870j
DO - 10.1039/d1ta08870j
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124938194
SN - 2050-7488
VL - 10
SP - 3460
EP - 3468
JO - Journal of Materials Chemistry A
JF - Journal of Materials Chemistry A
IS - 7
ER -