Reply to “Comment on ‘Theory for the bending anisotropy of lipid membranes and tubule formation’ ”

C. M. Chen

doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902

Reply to “Comment on ‘Theory for the bending anisotropy of lipid membranes and tubule formation’ ”

C. M. Chen^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We answer questions raised in the preceding Comment by Fournier and Peliti [Phys. Rev. E 63, 013901 (2001)] that relate to the size distribution of lipid vesicles. In particular, we point out several theoretical and experimental papers that are consistent with the model postulated in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 59, 6192 (1999)].

Original language	English
Journal	Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics
Volume	63
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902
Publication status	Published - 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Statistics and Probability
Condensed Matter Physics

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902

Cite this

@article{7b5b01e14eaf48138dc05c0538d431f2,

title = "Reply to “Comment on {\textquoteleft}Theory for the bending anisotropy of lipid membranes and tubule formation{\textquoteright} ”",

abstract = "We answer questions raised in the preceding Comment by Fournier and Peliti [Phys. Rev. E 63, 013901 (2001)] that relate to the size distribution of lipid vesicles. In particular, we point out several theoretical and experimental papers that are consistent with the model postulated in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 59, 6192 (1999)].",

author = "Chen, {C. M.}",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902",

language = "English",

volume = "63",

journal = "Physical Review E",

issn = "2470-0045",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to “Comment on ‘Theory for the bending anisotropy of lipid membranes and tubule formation’ ”

AU - Chen, C. M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We answer questions raised in the preceding Comment by Fournier and Peliti [Phys. Rev. E 63, 013901 (2001)] that relate to the size distribution of lipid vesicles. In particular, we point out several theoretical and experimental papers that are consistent with the model postulated in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 59, 6192 (1999)].

AB - We answer questions raised in the preceding Comment by Fournier and Peliti [Phys. Rev. E 63, 013901 (2001)] that relate to the size distribution of lipid vesicles. In particular, we point out several theoretical and experimental papers that are consistent with the model postulated in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 59, 6192 (1999)].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744836963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744836963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33744836963

SN - 2470-0045

VL - 63

JO - Physical Review E

JF - Physical Review E

IS - 1

ER -

Reply to “Comment on ‘Theory for the bending anisotropy of lipid membranes and tubule formation’ ”

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this