Reply to “Comment on ‘Theory for the bending anisotropy of lipid membranes and tubule formation’ ”

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We answer questions raised in the preceding Comment by Fournier and Peliti [Phys. Rev. E 63, 013901 (2001)] that relate to the size distribution of lipid vesicles. In particular, we point out several theoretical and experimental papers that are consistent with the model postulated in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 59, 6192 (1999)].

Original languageEnglish
JournalPhysical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Anisotropy
Vesicles
Membrane Lipids
Lipids
lipids
Membrane
membranes
anisotropy
Model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Mathematical Physics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

@article{725363a7f7144ef196ac874f2f9ef96a,
title = "Reply to “Comment on ‘Theory for the bending anisotropy of lipid membranes and tubule formation’ ”",
abstract = "We answer questions raised in the preceding Comment by Fournier and Peliti [Phys. Rev. E 63, 013901 (2001)] that relate to the size distribution of lipid vesicles. In particular, we point out several theoretical and experimental papers that are consistent with the model postulated in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 59, 6192 (1999)].",
author = "Chi-Ming Chen",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
journal = "Physical Review E",
issn = "2470-0045",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to “Comment on ‘Theory for the bending anisotropy of lipid membranes and tubule formation’ ”

AU - Chen, Chi-Ming

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - We answer questions raised in the preceding Comment by Fournier and Peliti [Phys. Rev. E 63, 013901 (2001)] that relate to the size distribution of lipid vesicles. In particular, we point out several theoretical and experimental papers that are consistent with the model postulated in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 59, 6192 (1999)].

AB - We answer questions raised in the preceding Comment by Fournier and Peliti [Phys. Rev. E 63, 013901 (2001)] that relate to the size distribution of lipid vesicles. In particular, we point out several theoretical and experimental papers that are consistent with the model postulated in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 59, 6192 (1999)].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744836963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744836963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.013902

M3 - Article

VL - 63

JO - Physical Review E

JF - Physical Review E

SN - 2470-0045

IS - 1

ER -