Remarks on the identifiability of thurstonian ranking models: Case V, Case III, or neither?

Rung Ching Tsai*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is well-known that the representations of the Thurstonian Case III and Case V models for paired comparison data are not unique. Similarly, when analyzing ranking data, other equivalent covariance structures can substitute for those given by Thurstone in these cases. That is, we may more broadly define the family of covariance structures satisfying Case III and Case V conditions. This paper introduces the notion of equivalence classes which defines a more meaningful partition of the covariance structures of the Thurstonian ranking models. In addition, the equivalence classes of Case V and Case III are completely characterized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-240
Number of pages8
JournalPsychometrika
Volume65
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000 Jun
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Identifiability
  • Ranking data
  • Thurstonian models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remarks on the identifiability of thurstonian ranking models: Case V, Case III, or neither?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this