Reexamining the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement: An individual-differences perspective

Yao-Ting Sung, Tzu Yang Chao, Fen Lan Tseng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that there is a negative correlation between test anxiety and performance. However, how the type of anxiety/stress, the examinees’ personal characteristics, and the method of assessment affect this relationship remained uninvestigated. Thus, the present study examined the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement among secondary-school students, as well as tested two anxiety-performance relationship models. The analysis of test-anxiety scores and the standardized entrance examination scores of 1931 Taiwanese ninth-graders revealed an overall coefficient of 0.18 for the correlation between anxiety and achievement. Students in the lower-achievement group (i.e., ranked from percentile 1 to percentile 50, PR1–50) exhibited a positive correlation between anxiety and achievement (r = 0.22), which is consistent with the motivational enhancement model, whereas students in the higher-achievement group (PR51–99) exhibited a negative correlation (r = −0.16), which corresponds to the cognitive interference model. This study also found that although girls report experiencing higher test anxiety than boys, the correlations between test anxiety and achievement are the same among boys and girls. Because both the motivational enhancement and cognitive interference models could not completely explain the results, we proposed a “stress-of-uncertainty” model to explain the inverted-U shape of the anxiety for students.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-252
Number of pages12
JournalContemporary Educational Psychology
Volume46
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Individuality
Anxiety
Learning
anxiety
learning
Students
interference
student
entrance examination
Uncertainty
performance
secondary school
Group
uncertainty

Keywords

  • Basic Competence Test
  • Examination stress
  • Gender difference
  • Learning achievement
  • Social expectations
  • Test anxiety
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Reexamining the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement : An individual-differences perspective. / Sung, Yao-Ting; Chao, Tzu Yang; Tseng, Fen Lan.

In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 46, 01.07.2016, p. 241-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd94ee8770e64bcbbf40588802c8f79b,
title = "Reexamining the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement: An individual-differences perspective",
abstract = "Previous studies have indicated that there is a negative correlation between test anxiety and performance. However, how the type of anxiety/stress, the examinees’ personal characteristics, and the method of assessment affect this relationship remained uninvestigated. Thus, the present study examined the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement among secondary-school students, as well as tested two anxiety-performance relationship models. The analysis of test-anxiety scores and the standardized entrance examination scores of 1931 Taiwanese ninth-graders revealed an overall coefficient of 0.18 for the correlation between anxiety and achievement. Students in the lower-achievement group (i.e., ranked from percentile 1 to percentile 50, PR1–50) exhibited a positive correlation between anxiety and achievement (r = 0.22), which is consistent with the motivational enhancement model, whereas students in the higher-achievement group (PR51–99) exhibited a negative correlation (r = −0.16), which corresponds to the cognitive interference model. This study also found that although girls report experiencing higher test anxiety than boys, the correlations between test anxiety and achievement are the same among boys and girls. Because both the motivational enhancement and cognitive interference models could not completely explain the results, we proposed a “stress-of-uncertainty” model to explain the inverted-U shape of the anxiety for students.",
keywords = "Basic Competence Test, Examination stress, Gender difference, Learning achievement, Social expectations, Test anxiety, Uncertainty",
author = "Yao-Ting Sung and Chao, {Tzu Yang} and Tseng, {Fen Lan}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "241--252",
journal = "Contemporary Educational Psychology",
issn = "0361-476X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reexamining the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement

T2 - An individual-differences perspective

AU - Sung, Yao-Ting

AU - Chao, Tzu Yang

AU - Tseng, Fen Lan

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Previous studies have indicated that there is a negative correlation between test anxiety and performance. However, how the type of anxiety/stress, the examinees’ personal characteristics, and the method of assessment affect this relationship remained uninvestigated. Thus, the present study examined the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement among secondary-school students, as well as tested two anxiety-performance relationship models. The analysis of test-anxiety scores and the standardized entrance examination scores of 1931 Taiwanese ninth-graders revealed an overall coefficient of 0.18 for the correlation between anxiety and achievement. Students in the lower-achievement group (i.e., ranked from percentile 1 to percentile 50, PR1–50) exhibited a positive correlation between anxiety and achievement (r = 0.22), which is consistent with the motivational enhancement model, whereas students in the higher-achievement group (PR51–99) exhibited a negative correlation (r = −0.16), which corresponds to the cognitive interference model. This study also found that although girls report experiencing higher test anxiety than boys, the correlations between test anxiety and achievement are the same among boys and girls. Because both the motivational enhancement and cognitive interference models could not completely explain the results, we proposed a “stress-of-uncertainty” model to explain the inverted-U shape of the anxiety for students.

AB - Previous studies have indicated that there is a negative correlation between test anxiety and performance. However, how the type of anxiety/stress, the examinees’ personal characteristics, and the method of assessment affect this relationship remained uninvestigated. Thus, the present study examined the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement among secondary-school students, as well as tested two anxiety-performance relationship models. The analysis of test-anxiety scores and the standardized entrance examination scores of 1931 Taiwanese ninth-graders revealed an overall coefficient of 0.18 for the correlation between anxiety and achievement. Students in the lower-achievement group (i.e., ranked from percentile 1 to percentile 50, PR1–50) exhibited a positive correlation between anxiety and achievement (r = 0.22), which is consistent with the motivational enhancement model, whereas students in the higher-achievement group (PR51–99) exhibited a negative correlation (r = −0.16), which corresponds to the cognitive interference model. This study also found that although girls report experiencing higher test anxiety than boys, the correlations between test anxiety and achievement are the same among boys and girls. Because both the motivational enhancement and cognitive interference models could not completely explain the results, we proposed a “stress-of-uncertainty” model to explain the inverted-U shape of the anxiety for students.

KW - Basic Competence Test

KW - Examination stress

KW - Gender difference

KW - Learning achievement

KW - Social expectations

KW - Test anxiety

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978791368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978791368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.07.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84978791368

VL - 46

SP - 241

EP - 252

JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology

JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology

SN - 0361-476X

ER -