Abstract
This paper examines the true nature of the reduplicant vowels in the two major types of reduplication in Truku, Ce- reduplication and CeCe- reduplication, which have been previously assumed to involve monosyllabic and disyllabic copying, respectively. The reduplicants of the two patterns (i.e., Ce- and CeCe-) contain schwas that are always considered as reduced vowels derived from the pretonic vowel reduction rule. Drawing evidence from three types of reduplication forms that have not been previously noticed/documented, that is, reduplication forms showing CeC- ~CeCe- variation, as well as reduplication taking place on monosyllabic words and on CV.- initial words, this paper argues that the schwas in the reduplicants of the two reduplication patterns do not always come from vowel reduction. Although the first schwa in the CeCe-reduplicant does come from vowel reduction, the final schwas in the CeCe- and Ce- reduplicant are actually inserted vowels that function to break up CC clusters. The findings also show that Ce- reduplication only copies consonants from the Base. Therefore, Truku, just as Squliq Atayal, also involves bare consonant copying.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 148-189 |
Number of pages | 42 |
Journal | Oceanic Linguistics |
Volume | 59 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language