Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children

Fang-Ying Yang, Chin Chung Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to fulfill social responsibility, one of the goals in science education is to equip students with the competence of scientific reasoning. Nevertheless, psychological studies have found that people in general do not have adequate ability to make scientific arguments in everyday situations. Later studies between scientific reasoning in informal contexts and the epistemological perspectives demonstrated by elementary school pupils. Participants of the study were 62 sixth graders who were interviewed to criticize two science-related uncertain issues. Content analysis showed that most children had developed the absolutist form of personal epistemology. Chi-square analyses suggested that the more multiplist view toward the certainty of knowledge and the process of knowing, the better coordination of theory and evidence as well as reflective reasoning. In addition, children's beliefs about the certainty of knowledge, source of knowledge and concept of justification were seemingly consistent across different issues. Nevertheless, content analysis showed that the criteria used to make judgments varied with problem contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-354
Number of pages30
JournalInstructional Science
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1

Fingerprint

content analysis
elementary school pupil
Aptitude
Social Responsibility
social responsibility
Pupil
science
epistemology
Mental Competency
Students
Psychology
Education
ability
evidence
education
student

Keywords

  • Epistemological development
  • Informal reasoning
  • Personal epistemology
  • Scientific reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children. / Yang, Fang-Ying; Tsai, Chin Chung.

In: Instructional Science, Vol. 38, No. 4, 01.01.2010, p. 325-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eea4fb02ac144a8183b67c6e52c3cc2e,
title = "Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children",
abstract = "In order to fulfill social responsibility, one of the goals in science education is to equip students with the competence of scientific reasoning. Nevertheless, psychological studies have found that people in general do not have adequate ability to make scientific arguments in everyday situations. Later studies between scientific reasoning in informal contexts and the epistemological perspectives demonstrated by elementary school pupils. Participants of the study were 62 sixth graders who were interviewed to criticize two science-related uncertain issues. Content analysis showed that most children had developed the absolutist form of personal epistemology. Chi-square analyses suggested that the more multiplist view toward the certainty of knowledge and the process of knowing, the better coordination of theory and evidence as well as reflective reasoning. In addition, children's beliefs about the certainty of knowledge, source of knowledge and concept of justification were seemingly consistent across different issues. Nevertheless, content analysis showed that the criteria used to make judgments varied with problem contexts.",
keywords = "Epistemological development, Informal reasoning, Personal epistemology, Scientific reasoning",
author = "Fang-Ying Yang and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11251-008-9084-3",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "325--354",
journal = "Instructional Science",
issn = "0020-4277",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children

AU - Yang, Fang-Ying

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - In order to fulfill social responsibility, one of the goals in science education is to equip students with the competence of scientific reasoning. Nevertheless, psychological studies have found that people in general do not have adequate ability to make scientific arguments in everyday situations. Later studies between scientific reasoning in informal contexts and the epistemological perspectives demonstrated by elementary school pupils. Participants of the study were 62 sixth graders who were interviewed to criticize two science-related uncertain issues. Content analysis showed that most children had developed the absolutist form of personal epistemology. Chi-square analyses suggested that the more multiplist view toward the certainty of knowledge and the process of knowing, the better coordination of theory and evidence as well as reflective reasoning. In addition, children's beliefs about the certainty of knowledge, source of knowledge and concept of justification were seemingly consistent across different issues. Nevertheless, content analysis showed that the criteria used to make judgments varied with problem contexts.

AB - In order to fulfill social responsibility, one of the goals in science education is to equip students with the competence of scientific reasoning. Nevertheless, psychological studies have found that people in general do not have adequate ability to make scientific arguments in everyday situations. Later studies between scientific reasoning in informal contexts and the epistemological perspectives demonstrated by elementary school pupils. Participants of the study were 62 sixth graders who were interviewed to criticize two science-related uncertain issues. Content analysis showed that most children had developed the absolutist form of personal epistemology. Chi-square analyses suggested that the more multiplist view toward the certainty of knowledge and the process of knowing, the better coordination of theory and evidence as well as reflective reasoning. In addition, children's beliefs about the certainty of knowledge, source of knowledge and concept of justification were seemingly consistent across different issues. Nevertheless, content analysis showed that the criteria used to make judgments varied with problem contexts.

KW - Epistemological development

KW - Informal reasoning

KW - Personal epistemology

KW - Scientific reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953961435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953961435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11251-008-9084-3

DO - 10.1007/s11251-008-9084-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953961435

VL - 38

SP - 325

EP - 354

JO - Instructional Science

JF - Instructional Science

SN - 0020-4277

IS - 4

ER -