Proximate units in word production

Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English

Padraig G. O'Seaghdha, Jenn-Yeu Chen, Train Min Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Mandarin Chinese, speakers benefit from fore-knowledge of what the first syllable but not of what the first phonemic segment of a disyllabic word will be (Chen, Chen, & Dell, 2002), contrasting with findings in English, Dutch, and other Indo-European languages, and challenging the generality of current theories of word production. In this article, we extend the evidence for the language difference by showing that failure to prepare onsets in Mandarin (Experiment 1) applies even to simple monosyllables (Experiments 2-4), and confirm the contrast with English for comparable materials (Experiments 5 and 6). We also provide new evidence that Mandarin speakers do reliably prepare tonally unspecified phonological syllables (Experiment 7). To account for these patterns, we propose a language general proximate units principle whereby intentional preparation for speech as well as phonological-lexical coordination are grounded at the first phonological level below the word at which explicit unit selection occurs. The language difference arises because syllables are proximate units in Mandarin Chinese, whereas segments are proximate in English and other Indo-European languages. The proximate units perspective reconciles the aspiration toward a language general account of word production with the reality of substantial cross-linguistic differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-302
Number of pages21
JournalCognition
Volume115
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 May 1

Fingerprint

Language
language
experiment
Linguistics
evidence
Experiment
Word Production
Phonological Encoding
Mandarin Chinese
linguistics
Indo-European Languages
Language Differences

Keywords

  • Cross-linguistic analysis
  • Phonological encoding
  • Proximate units
  • Speech planning
  • Syllable production

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Proximate units in word production : Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. / O'Seaghdha, Padraig G.; Chen, Jenn-Yeu; Chen, Train Min.

In: Cognition, Vol. 115, No. 2, 01.05.2010, p. 282-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b84857d1dd4f47acbf848c60d064e348,
title = "Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English",
abstract = "In Mandarin Chinese, speakers benefit from fore-knowledge of what the first syllable but not of what the first phonemic segment of a disyllabic word will be (Chen, Chen, & Dell, 2002), contrasting with findings in English, Dutch, and other Indo-European languages, and challenging the generality of current theories of word production. In this article, we extend the evidence for the language difference by showing that failure to prepare onsets in Mandarin (Experiment 1) applies even to simple monosyllables (Experiments 2-4), and confirm the contrast with English for comparable materials (Experiments 5 and 6). We also provide new evidence that Mandarin speakers do reliably prepare tonally unspecified phonological syllables (Experiment 7). To account for these patterns, we propose a language general proximate units principle whereby intentional preparation for speech as well as phonological-lexical coordination are grounded at the first phonological level below the word at which explicit unit selection occurs. The language difference arises because syllables are proximate units in Mandarin Chinese, whereas segments are proximate in English and other Indo-European languages. The proximate units perspective reconciles the aspiration toward a language general account of word production with the reality of substantial cross-linguistic differences.",
keywords = "Cross-linguistic analysis, Phonological encoding, Proximate units, Speech planning, Syllable production",
author = "O'Seaghdha, {Padraig G.} and Jenn-Yeu Chen and Chen, {Train Min}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "282--302",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proximate units in word production

T2 - Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English

AU - O'Seaghdha, Padraig G.

AU - Chen, Jenn-Yeu

AU - Chen, Train Min

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - In Mandarin Chinese, speakers benefit from fore-knowledge of what the first syllable but not of what the first phonemic segment of a disyllabic word will be (Chen, Chen, & Dell, 2002), contrasting with findings in English, Dutch, and other Indo-European languages, and challenging the generality of current theories of word production. In this article, we extend the evidence for the language difference by showing that failure to prepare onsets in Mandarin (Experiment 1) applies even to simple monosyllables (Experiments 2-4), and confirm the contrast with English for comparable materials (Experiments 5 and 6). We also provide new evidence that Mandarin speakers do reliably prepare tonally unspecified phonological syllables (Experiment 7). To account for these patterns, we propose a language general proximate units principle whereby intentional preparation for speech as well as phonological-lexical coordination are grounded at the first phonological level below the word at which explicit unit selection occurs. The language difference arises because syllables are proximate units in Mandarin Chinese, whereas segments are proximate in English and other Indo-European languages. The proximate units perspective reconciles the aspiration toward a language general account of word production with the reality of substantial cross-linguistic differences.

AB - In Mandarin Chinese, speakers benefit from fore-knowledge of what the first syllable but not of what the first phonemic segment of a disyllabic word will be (Chen, Chen, & Dell, 2002), contrasting with findings in English, Dutch, and other Indo-European languages, and challenging the generality of current theories of word production. In this article, we extend the evidence for the language difference by showing that failure to prepare onsets in Mandarin (Experiment 1) applies even to simple monosyllables (Experiments 2-4), and confirm the contrast with English for comparable materials (Experiments 5 and 6). We also provide new evidence that Mandarin speakers do reliably prepare tonally unspecified phonological syllables (Experiment 7). To account for these patterns, we propose a language general proximate units principle whereby intentional preparation for speech as well as phonological-lexical coordination are grounded at the first phonological level below the word at which explicit unit selection occurs. The language difference arises because syllables are proximate units in Mandarin Chinese, whereas segments are proximate in English and other Indo-European languages. The proximate units perspective reconciles the aspiration toward a language general account of word production with the reality of substantial cross-linguistic differences.

KW - Cross-linguistic analysis

KW - Phonological encoding

KW - Proximate units

KW - Speech planning

KW - Syllable production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649179858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649179858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 282

EP - 302

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 2

ER -