TY - JOUR
T1 - Processing preference toward object-extracted relative clauses in mandarin chinese by l1 and l2 speakers
T2 - An eye-tracking study
AU - Sung, Yao Ting
AU - Tu, Jung Yueh
AU - Cha, Jih Ho
AU - Wu, Ming Da
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Sung, Tu, Cha and Wu.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The current study employed an eye-movement technique with an attempt to explore the reading patterns for the two types of Chinese relative clauses, subject-extracted relative clauses (SRCs) and object-extracted relative clauses (ORCs), by native speakers (L1), and Japanese learners (L2) of Chinese. The data were analyzed in terms of gaze duration, regression path duration, and regression rate on the two critical regions, head noun, and embedded verb. The results indicated that both the L1 and L2 participants spent less time on the head nouns in ORCs than in SRCs. Also, the L2 participants spent less time on the embedded verbs in ORCs than in SRCs and their regression rate for embedded verbs was generally lower in ORCs than in SRC. The findings showed that the participants experienced less processing difficulty in ORCs than SRCs. These results suggest an ORC preference in L1 and L2 speakers of Chinese, which provides evidence in support of linear distance hypothesis and implies that the syntactic nature of Chinese is at play in the RC processing.
AB - The current study employed an eye-movement technique with an attempt to explore the reading patterns for the two types of Chinese relative clauses, subject-extracted relative clauses (SRCs) and object-extracted relative clauses (ORCs), by native speakers (L1), and Japanese learners (L2) of Chinese. The data were analyzed in terms of gaze duration, regression path duration, and regression rate on the two critical regions, head noun, and embedded verb. The results indicated that both the L1 and L2 participants spent less time on the head nouns in ORCs than in SRCs. Also, the L2 participants spent less time on the embedded verbs in ORCs than in SRCs and their regression rate for embedded verbs was generally lower in ORCs than in SRC. The findings showed that the participants experienced less processing difficulty in ORCs than SRCs. These results suggest an ORC preference in L1 and L2 speakers of Chinese, which provides evidence in support of linear distance hypothesis and implies that the syntactic nature of Chinese is at play in the RC processing.
KW - Eye-movements
KW - Japanese CSL learners
KW - L2 sentence processing
KW - Mandarin Chinese
KW - Relative clauses
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958255738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958255738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00004
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84958255738
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 7
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
IS - JAN
M1 - 4
ER -