Processing Chinese relative clauses in context

Edward Gibson, H. H.Iris Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a self-paced reading experiment comparing the processing of subject-extracted relative clauses (SRCs) and object-extracted relative clauses (ORCs) in supportive contexts in Chinese. It is argued that lack of a consistent pattern in the literature for the comparison between Chinese SRCs and ORCs is due to potential temporary ambiguity in these constructions in null contexts. By placing the materials in contexts biased towards a relative clause (RC) interpretation, we limit the effects of temporary ambiguity. The results of the experiment demonstrate that SRCs are read more slowly than ORCs in supportive contexts. These results provide evidence for working memory-based sentence processing theories whereby processing difficulty increases for connecting sentence elements that are further apart. Some convergent evidence that strengthens these conclusions comes from recent research on aphasic populations where a dissociation between English and Chinese RC processing has been revealed: whereas English aphasic patients have more difficulty with ORCs and Chinese aphasic patients have more difficulty with SRCs (Su, Lee, & Chung, 2007). Taken together, these results support the idea that sentence processing is constrained by working memory limitations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-155
Number of pages31
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume28
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Reading
experiment
Research
Population
evidence
interpretation
Relative Clauses
lack

Keywords

  • Relative clause
  • Sentence processing
  • Syntactic complexity
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. / Gibson, Edward; Wu, H. H.Iris.

In: Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 28, No. 1-2, 01.01.2013, p. 125-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gibson, Edward ; Wu, H. H.Iris. / Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. In: Language and Cognitive Processes. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 1-2. pp. 125-155.
@article{325165dc92ec455b962f3a9eb8d232dc,
title = "Processing Chinese relative clauses in context",
abstract = "This paper presents a self-paced reading experiment comparing the processing of subject-extracted relative clauses (SRCs) and object-extracted relative clauses (ORCs) in supportive contexts in Chinese. It is argued that lack of a consistent pattern in the literature for the comparison between Chinese SRCs and ORCs is due to potential temporary ambiguity in these constructions in null contexts. By placing the materials in contexts biased towards a relative clause (RC) interpretation, we limit the effects of temporary ambiguity. The results of the experiment demonstrate that SRCs are read more slowly than ORCs in supportive contexts. These results provide evidence for working memory-based sentence processing theories whereby processing difficulty increases for connecting sentence elements that are further apart. Some convergent evidence that strengthens these conclusions comes from recent research on aphasic populations where a dissociation between English and Chinese RC processing has been revealed: whereas English aphasic patients have more difficulty with ORCs and Chinese aphasic patients have more difficulty with SRCs (Su, Lee, & Chung, 2007). Taken together, these results support the idea that sentence processing is constrained by working memory limitations.",
keywords = "Relative clause, Sentence processing, Syntactic complexity, Working memory",
author = "Edward Gibson and Wu, {H. H.Iris}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01690965.2010.536656",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "125--155",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processing Chinese relative clauses in context

AU - Gibson, Edward

AU - Wu, H. H.Iris

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - This paper presents a self-paced reading experiment comparing the processing of subject-extracted relative clauses (SRCs) and object-extracted relative clauses (ORCs) in supportive contexts in Chinese. It is argued that lack of a consistent pattern in the literature for the comparison between Chinese SRCs and ORCs is due to potential temporary ambiguity in these constructions in null contexts. By placing the materials in contexts biased towards a relative clause (RC) interpretation, we limit the effects of temporary ambiguity. The results of the experiment demonstrate that SRCs are read more slowly than ORCs in supportive contexts. These results provide evidence for working memory-based sentence processing theories whereby processing difficulty increases for connecting sentence elements that are further apart. Some convergent evidence that strengthens these conclusions comes from recent research on aphasic populations where a dissociation between English and Chinese RC processing has been revealed: whereas English aphasic patients have more difficulty with ORCs and Chinese aphasic patients have more difficulty with SRCs (Su, Lee, & Chung, 2007). Taken together, these results support the idea that sentence processing is constrained by working memory limitations.

AB - This paper presents a self-paced reading experiment comparing the processing of subject-extracted relative clauses (SRCs) and object-extracted relative clauses (ORCs) in supportive contexts in Chinese. It is argued that lack of a consistent pattern in the literature for the comparison between Chinese SRCs and ORCs is due to potential temporary ambiguity in these constructions in null contexts. By placing the materials in contexts biased towards a relative clause (RC) interpretation, we limit the effects of temporary ambiguity. The results of the experiment demonstrate that SRCs are read more slowly than ORCs in supportive contexts. These results provide evidence for working memory-based sentence processing theories whereby processing difficulty increases for connecting sentence elements that are further apart. Some convergent evidence that strengthens these conclusions comes from recent research on aphasic populations where a dissociation between English and Chinese RC processing has been revealed: whereas English aphasic patients have more difficulty with ORCs and Chinese aphasic patients have more difficulty with SRCs (Su, Lee, & Chung, 2007). Taken together, these results support the idea that sentence processing is constrained by working memory limitations.

KW - Relative clause

KW - Sentence processing

KW - Syntactic complexity

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873106996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873106996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01690965.2010.536656

DO - 10.1080/01690965.2010.536656

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873106996

VL - 28

SP - 125

EP - 155

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 1-2

ER -