Primary school students' Decision-making argumentation in cyber-ethics dilemmas

Chun Hsu Lin, Shih Ming Huang, Pei Shan Wu, Chiung-Hui Chiu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This study involved 38 primary school students in a detective game about cyber-ethics dilemmas and explored students' skills at making a reasoned decision and presenting a convincing argument. This game continued for five weeks and was supported by a computer system. It started with a given speculation/hypothesis. Then each student collected at least a piece of supporting evidence and wrote it up on the computer system for each week. During the evidence collection period, the researchers, playing a witness of the opposing side, actively provided refuting evidence each week. For the last week, the students were required to draw respective conclusions/decisions based on their collected evidence and given refuting evidence. All the students' constructed arguments for describing evidences and conclusions were analyzed. It was found that most of the students (about 92%) developed arguments consisting of either claims only or claims and data. They would not be able to construct complicated arguments with backings, warrants and rebuttals.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference
Subtitle of host publicationCelebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010 - Conference Program
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec 1
Event40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010 - Arlington, VA, United States
Duration: 2010 Oct 272010 Oct 30

Publication series

NameProceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
ISSN (Print)1539-4565

Other

Other40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010
CountryUnited States
CityArlington, VA
Period10/10/2710/10/30

Fingerprint

argumentation
primary school
Decision making
moral philosophy
Students
decision making
evidence
student
Computer systems
speculation
witness

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Cyber-ethics dilemma
  • Decision-making
  • Detective game

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Lin, C. H., Huang, S. M., Wu, P. S., & Chiu, C-H. (2010). Primary school students' Decision-making argumentation in cyber-ethics dilemmas. In 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010 - Conference Program [5673662] (Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2010.5673662

Primary school students' Decision-making argumentation in cyber-ethics dilemmas. / Lin, Chun Hsu; Huang, Shih Ming; Wu, Pei Shan; Chiu, Chiung-Hui.

40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010 - Conference Program. 2010. 5673662 (Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Lin, CH, Huang, SM, Wu, PS & Chiu, C-H 2010, Primary school students' Decision-making argumentation in cyber-ethics dilemmas. in 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010 - Conference Program., 5673662, Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010, Arlington, VA, United States, 10/10/27. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2010.5673662
Lin CH, Huang SM, Wu PS, Chiu C-H. Primary school students' Decision-making argumentation in cyber-ethics dilemmas. In 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010 - Conference Program. 2010. 5673662. (Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2010.5673662
Lin, Chun Hsu ; Huang, Shih Ming ; Wu, Pei Shan ; Chiu, Chiung-Hui. / Primary school students' Decision-making argumentation in cyber-ethics dilemmas. 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010 - Conference Program. 2010. (Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE).
@inproceedings{a1a672a1348d452c97d66756dfd8379a,
title = "Primary school students' Decision-making argumentation in cyber-ethics dilemmas",
abstract = "This study involved 38 primary school students in a detective game about cyber-ethics dilemmas and explored students' skills at making a reasoned decision and presenting a convincing argument. This game continued for five weeks and was supported by a computer system. It started with a given speculation/hypothesis. Then each student collected at least a piece of supporting evidence and wrote it up on the computer system for each week. During the evidence collection period, the researchers, playing a witness of the opposing side, actively provided refuting evidence each week. For the last week, the students were required to draw respective conclusions/decisions based on their collected evidence and given refuting evidence. All the students' constructed arguments for describing evidences and conclusions were analyzed. It was found that most of the students (about 92{\%}) developed arguments consisting of either claims only or claims and data. They would not be able to construct complicated arguments with backings, warrants and rebuttals.",
keywords = "Argumentation, Cyber-ethics dilemma, Decision-making, Detective game",
author = "Lin, {Chun Hsu} and Huang, {Shih Ming} and Wu, {Pei Shan} and Chiung-Hui Chiu",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/FIE.2010.5673662",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781424462599",
series = "Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE",
booktitle = "40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Primary school students' Decision-making argumentation in cyber-ethics dilemmas

AU - Lin, Chun Hsu

AU - Huang, Shih Ming

AU - Wu, Pei Shan

AU - Chiu, Chiung-Hui

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - This study involved 38 primary school students in a detective game about cyber-ethics dilemmas and explored students' skills at making a reasoned decision and presenting a convincing argument. This game continued for five weeks and was supported by a computer system. It started with a given speculation/hypothesis. Then each student collected at least a piece of supporting evidence and wrote it up on the computer system for each week. During the evidence collection period, the researchers, playing a witness of the opposing side, actively provided refuting evidence each week. For the last week, the students were required to draw respective conclusions/decisions based on their collected evidence and given refuting evidence. All the students' constructed arguments for describing evidences and conclusions were analyzed. It was found that most of the students (about 92%) developed arguments consisting of either claims only or claims and data. They would not be able to construct complicated arguments with backings, warrants and rebuttals.

AB - This study involved 38 primary school students in a detective game about cyber-ethics dilemmas and explored students' skills at making a reasoned decision and presenting a convincing argument. This game continued for five weeks and was supported by a computer system. It started with a given speculation/hypothesis. Then each student collected at least a piece of supporting evidence and wrote it up on the computer system for each week. During the evidence collection period, the researchers, playing a witness of the opposing side, actively provided refuting evidence each week. For the last week, the students were required to draw respective conclusions/decisions based on their collected evidence and given refuting evidence. All the students' constructed arguments for describing evidences and conclusions were analyzed. It was found that most of the students (about 92%) developed arguments consisting of either claims only or claims and data. They would not be able to construct complicated arguments with backings, warrants and rebuttals.

KW - Argumentation

KW - Cyber-ethics dilemma

KW - Decision-making

KW - Detective game

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751556284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751556284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673662

DO - 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673662

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:78751556284

SN - 9781424462599

T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

BT - 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference

ER -