Pharmacoeconomics of therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome: plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin

Ching Piao Tsai*, Kai Chen Wang, Chih Yang Liu, Wen Yung Sheng, Tzu Chi Lee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute neuropathy and a clinical syndrome that includes a number of pathological and electrophysiological subtypes. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasma exchange (PE) are both equally efficacious for the treatment of GBS; however, the cost of IVIG may be lower for both the patient and the healthcare system. To compare the pharmacoeconomics of PE and IVIG in GBS, a retrospective study was done from 1999 to 2004, which included a total of 24 patients with GBS who were admitted to Taipei Veterans General Hospital. This showed that except for the costs of the drugs used in IVIG, treatment of GBS with IVIG was more cost-effective (p = 0.057) than that with PE in total length of hospitalization and the cost of procedures and hospitalization. The study also showed that the total costs were higher for patients on ventilators than those not requiring ventilators (p = 0.008, t-test) and the length of hospitalization showed a very strong linear relationship to total costs (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.907). The regression analysis showed that each additional day of hospitalization increased the hospitalization costs by an average of 5599 New Taiwan Dollars (NT) (US$1.00 = NT$33.50 in 2005).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-629
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Jul
Externally publishedYes


  • Guillain-Barré syndrome
  • Intravenous immunoglobulin
  • Pharmacoeconomics
  • Plasma exchange

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)


Dive into the research topics of 'Pharmacoeconomics of therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome: plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this