Pedagogical Affordances of Multiple External Representations in Scientific Processes

Hsin-Kai Wu, Sadhana Puntambekar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple external representations (MERs) have been widely used in science teaching and learning. Theories such as dual coding theory and cognitive flexibility theory have been developed to explain why the use of MERs is beneficial to learning, but they do not provide much information on pedagogical issues such as how and in what conditions MERs could be introduced and used to support students' engagement in scientific processes and develop competent scientific practices (e. g., asking questions, planning investigations, and analyzing data). Additionally, little is understood about complex interactions among scientific processes and affordances of MERs. Therefore, this article focuses on pedagogical affordances of MERs in learning environments that engage students in various scientific processes. By reviewing literature in science education and cognitive psychology and integrating multiple perspectives, this article aims at exploring (1) how MERs can be integrated with science processes due to their different affordances, and (2) how student learning with MERs can be scaffolded, especially in a classroom situation. We argue that pairing representations and scientific processes in a principled way based on the affordances of the representations and the goals of the activities is a powerful way to use MERs in science education. Finally, we outline types of scaffolding that could help effective use of MERs including dynamic linking, model progression, support in instructional materials, teacher support, and active engagement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)754-767
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Science Education and Technology
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Students
Education
Dynamic models
Teaching
Planning
science
learning
student
coding
education
learning environment
flexibility
psychology
classroom
planning
teacher
interaction

Keywords

  • Affordance
  • External representation
  • Multiple representations
  • Scientific process

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Pedagogical Affordances of Multiple External Representations in Scientific Processes. / Wu, Hsin-Kai; Puntambekar, Sadhana.

In: Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 6, 01.12.2012, p. 754-767.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b1f3c31e32e04d5ca8be29a4390e7237,
title = "Pedagogical Affordances of Multiple External Representations in Scientific Processes",
abstract = "Multiple external representations (MERs) have been widely used in science teaching and learning. Theories such as dual coding theory and cognitive flexibility theory have been developed to explain why the use of MERs is beneficial to learning, but they do not provide much information on pedagogical issues such as how and in what conditions MERs could be introduced and used to support students' engagement in scientific processes and develop competent scientific practices (e. g., asking questions, planning investigations, and analyzing data). Additionally, little is understood about complex interactions among scientific processes and affordances of MERs. Therefore, this article focuses on pedagogical affordances of MERs in learning environments that engage students in various scientific processes. By reviewing literature in science education and cognitive psychology and integrating multiple perspectives, this article aims at exploring (1) how MERs can be integrated with science processes due to their different affordances, and (2) how student learning with MERs can be scaffolded, especially in a classroom situation. We argue that pairing representations and scientific processes in a principled way based on the affordances of the representations and the goals of the activities is a powerful way to use MERs in science education. Finally, we outline types of scaffolding that could help effective use of MERs including dynamic linking, model progression, support in instructional materials, teacher support, and active engagement.",
keywords = "Affordance, External representation, Multiple representations, Scientific process",
author = "Hsin-Kai Wu and Sadhana Puntambekar",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10956-011-9363-7",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "754--767",
journal = "Journal of Science Education and Technology",
issn = "1059-0145",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pedagogical Affordances of Multiple External Representations in Scientific Processes

AU - Wu, Hsin-Kai

AU - Puntambekar, Sadhana

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Multiple external representations (MERs) have been widely used in science teaching and learning. Theories such as dual coding theory and cognitive flexibility theory have been developed to explain why the use of MERs is beneficial to learning, but they do not provide much information on pedagogical issues such as how and in what conditions MERs could be introduced and used to support students' engagement in scientific processes and develop competent scientific practices (e. g., asking questions, planning investigations, and analyzing data). Additionally, little is understood about complex interactions among scientific processes and affordances of MERs. Therefore, this article focuses on pedagogical affordances of MERs in learning environments that engage students in various scientific processes. By reviewing literature in science education and cognitive psychology and integrating multiple perspectives, this article aims at exploring (1) how MERs can be integrated with science processes due to their different affordances, and (2) how student learning with MERs can be scaffolded, especially in a classroom situation. We argue that pairing representations and scientific processes in a principled way based on the affordances of the representations and the goals of the activities is a powerful way to use MERs in science education. Finally, we outline types of scaffolding that could help effective use of MERs including dynamic linking, model progression, support in instructional materials, teacher support, and active engagement.

AB - Multiple external representations (MERs) have been widely used in science teaching and learning. Theories such as dual coding theory and cognitive flexibility theory have been developed to explain why the use of MERs is beneficial to learning, but they do not provide much information on pedagogical issues such as how and in what conditions MERs could be introduced and used to support students' engagement in scientific processes and develop competent scientific practices (e. g., asking questions, planning investigations, and analyzing data). Additionally, little is understood about complex interactions among scientific processes and affordances of MERs. Therefore, this article focuses on pedagogical affordances of MERs in learning environments that engage students in various scientific processes. By reviewing literature in science education and cognitive psychology and integrating multiple perspectives, this article aims at exploring (1) how MERs can be integrated with science processes due to their different affordances, and (2) how student learning with MERs can be scaffolded, especially in a classroom situation. We argue that pairing representations and scientific processes in a principled way based on the affordances of the representations and the goals of the activities is a powerful way to use MERs in science education. Finally, we outline types of scaffolding that could help effective use of MERs including dynamic linking, model progression, support in instructional materials, teacher support, and active engagement.

KW - Affordance

KW - External representation

KW - Multiple representations

KW - Scientific process

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870362879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870362879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10956-011-9363-7

DO - 10.1007/s10956-011-9363-7

M3 - Review article

VL - 21

SP - 754

EP - 767

JO - Journal of Science Education and Technology

JF - Journal of Science Education and Technology

SN - 1059-0145

IS - 6

ER -