On the importance of distinguishing between within- and between-subject effects in intransitive intertemporal choice

Rung Ching Tsai, Ulf Böckenholt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most probabilistic paired comparison models treat inconsistent choices as caused by independent and random errors in the pairwise judgments. In this paper, we argue that this assumption is too restrictive for the analysis of paired comparison data obtained from multiple judges when transitivity violations are systematic. We present a new framework that contains the random error assumption as a special case but also allows for systematic changes in an option's utility assessments over the pairwise comparisons. Accounting for both between- and within-judge sources of variability, we demonstrate in an application on intertemporal choice that the proposed framework can capture systematic transitivity violations as well as individual taste differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-20
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Mathematical Psychology
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Intransitive
Matched-Pair Analysis
Paired Comparisons
Random errors
Random Error
Transitivity
Individual Differences
Pairwise Comparisons
Individuality
Inconsistent
Pairwise
Demonstrate
Framework
Model
Judgment

Keywords

  • Intransitivity
  • Paired comparison data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

On the importance of distinguishing between within- and between-subject effects in intransitive intertemporal choice. / Tsai, Rung Ching; Böckenholt, Ulf.

In: Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 1, 01.02.2008, p. 10-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87872337ed5f48179c85d164637bc051,
title = "On the importance of distinguishing between within- and between-subject effects in intransitive intertemporal choice",
abstract = "Most probabilistic paired comparison models treat inconsistent choices as caused by independent and random errors in the pairwise judgments. In this paper, we argue that this assumption is too restrictive for the analysis of paired comparison data obtained from multiple judges when transitivity violations are systematic. We present a new framework that contains the random error assumption as a special case but also allows for systematic changes in an option's utility assessments over the pairwise comparisons. Accounting for both between- and within-judge sources of variability, we demonstrate in an application on intertemporal choice that the proposed framework can capture systematic transitivity violations as well as individual taste differences.",
keywords = "Intransitivity, Paired comparison data",
author = "Tsai, {Rung Ching} and Ulf B{\"o}ckenholt",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmp.2007.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "10--20",
journal = "Journal of Mathematical Psychology",
issn = "0022-2496",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the importance of distinguishing between within- and between-subject effects in intransitive intertemporal choice

AU - Tsai, Rung Ching

AU - Böckenholt, Ulf

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - Most probabilistic paired comparison models treat inconsistent choices as caused by independent and random errors in the pairwise judgments. In this paper, we argue that this assumption is too restrictive for the analysis of paired comparison data obtained from multiple judges when transitivity violations are systematic. We present a new framework that contains the random error assumption as a special case but also allows for systematic changes in an option's utility assessments over the pairwise comparisons. Accounting for both between- and within-judge sources of variability, we demonstrate in an application on intertemporal choice that the proposed framework can capture systematic transitivity violations as well as individual taste differences.

AB - Most probabilistic paired comparison models treat inconsistent choices as caused by independent and random errors in the pairwise judgments. In this paper, we argue that this assumption is too restrictive for the analysis of paired comparison data obtained from multiple judges when transitivity violations are systematic. We present a new framework that contains the random error assumption as a special case but also allows for systematic changes in an option's utility assessments over the pairwise comparisons. Accounting for both between- and within-judge sources of variability, we demonstrate in an application on intertemporal choice that the proposed framework can capture systematic transitivity violations as well as individual taste differences.

KW - Intransitivity

KW - Paired comparison data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40749128531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40749128531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmp.2007.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jmp.2007.09.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:40749128531

VL - 52

SP - 10

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Mathematical Psychology

JF - Journal of Mathematical Psychology

SN - 0022-2496

IS - 1

ER -