TY - JOUR
T1 - On Tense, agreement, and the syntax of null and overt subjects
T2 - Evidence from Romance infinitives
AU - Fernández-Salgueiro, Gerardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In this paper I argue that the position and realization of subjects in adverbial non-finite clauses in Italian, Spanish, Galician, and European Portuguese can provide valuable insight into the licensing conditions for pro and postverbal subjects in finite clauses in these pro-drop languages. I first provide evidence that Tense and Agreement constitute separate syntactic heads in these languages, as argued by Belletti (1990) among others, and also apply this analysis to non-finite clauses in Spanish, Galician, and Portuguese. I will also argue, after analyzing the syntactic variation exhibited by subjects in non-finite clauses (containing regular and inflected infinitives) in Spanish, Galician, and European Portuguese, that (i) postverbal overt subject DPs are licensed by a full set of φ-features in Agr (overt or covert), (ii) pro is licensed by an Agr head that is overtly realized by either overt φ-features or verb movement, and (iii) preverbal overt subject DPs are licensed by verb movement to Agr.
AB - In this paper I argue that the position and realization of subjects in adverbial non-finite clauses in Italian, Spanish, Galician, and European Portuguese can provide valuable insight into the licensing conditions for pro and postverbal subjects in finite clauses in these pro-drop languages. I first provide evidence that Tense and Agreement constitute separate syntactic heads in these languages, as argued by Belletti (1990) among others, and also apply this analysis to non-finite clauses in Spanish, Galician, and Portuguese. I will also argue, after analyzing the syntactic variation exhibited by subjects in non-finite clauses (containing regular and inflected infinitives) in Spanish, Galician, and European Portuguese, that (i) postverbal overt subject DPs are licensed by a full set of φ-features in Agr (overt or covert), (ii) pro is licensed by an Agr head that is overtly realized by either overt φ-features or verb movement, and (iii) preverbal overt subject DPs are licensed by verb movement to Agr.
KW - agreement
KW - infinitives
KW - null subjects
KW - pro-drop
KW - Romance languages
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213034825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85213034825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5565/rev/isogloss.416
DO - 10.5565/rev/isogloss.416
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85213034825
SN - 2385-4138
VL - 10
JO - Isogloss
JF - Isogloss
IS - 7
M1 - 2
ER -