Normalizing XRF-scanner data

A cautionary note on the interpretation of high-resolution records from organic-rich lakes

L. Löwemark, H. F. Chen, T. N. Yang, M. Kylander, Ein-Fen Yu, Y. W. Hsu, T. Q. Lee, S. R. Song, S. Jarvis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanning of unlithified, untreated sediment cores is becoming an increasingly common method used to obtain paleoproxy data from lake records. XRF-scanning is fast and delivers high-resolution records of relative variations in the elemental composition of the sediment. However, lake sediments display extreme variations in their organic matter content, which can vary from just a few percent to well over 50%. As XRF scanners are largely insensitive to organic material in the sediment, increasing levels of organic material effectively dilute those components that can be measured, such as the lithogenic material (the closed-sum effect). Consequently, in sediments with large variations in organic material, the measured variations in an element will to a large extent mirror the changes in organic material. It is therefore necessary to normalize the elements in the lithogenic component of the sediment against a conservative element to allow changes in the input of the elements to be addressed. In this study we show that Al, which is the lightest element that can be measured using the Itrax XRF-scanner, can be used to effectively normalize the elements of the lithogenic fraction of the sediment against variations in organic content. We also show that care must be taken when choosing resolution and exposure time to ensure optimal output from the measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1250-1256
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Asian Earth Sciences
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Apr 2

Fingerprint

scanner
X-ray fluorescence
lake
sediment
sediment core
lacustrine deposit
material
organic matter

Keywords

  • Lake sediment
  • Normalization
  • XRF-scanning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Normalizing XRF-scanner data : A cautionary note on the interpretation of high-resolution records from organic-rich lakes. / Löwemark, L.; Chen, H. F.; Yang, T. N.; Kylander, M.; Yu, Ein-Fen; Hsu, Y. W.; Lee, T. Q.; Song, S. R.; Jarvis, S.

In: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 6, 02.04.2011, p. 1250-1256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Löwemark, L. ; Chen, H. F. ; Yang, T. N. ; Kylander, M. ; Yu, Ein-Fen ; Hsu, Y. W. ; Lee, T. Q. ; Song, S. R. ; Jarvis, S. / Normalizing XRF-scanner data : A cautionary note on the interpretation of high-resolution records from organic-rich lakes. In: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2011 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 1250-1256.
@article{fa8f0c606a4f47edb35bc7ccb40b5e93,
title = "Normalizing XRF-scanner data: A cautionary note on the interpretation of high-resolution records from organic-rich lakes",
abstract = "X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanning of unlithified, untreated sediment cores is becoming an increasingly common method used to obtain paleoproxy data from lake records. XRF-scanning is fast and delivers high-resolution records of relative variations in the elemental composition of the sediment. However, lake sediments display extreme variations in their organic matter content, which can vary from just a few percent to well over 50{\%}. As XRF scanners are largely insensitive to organic material in the sediment, increasing levels of organic material effectively dilute those components that can be measured, such as the lithogenic material (the closed-sum effect). Consequently, in sediments with large variations in organic material, the measured variations in an element will to a large extent mirror the changes in organic material. It is therefore necessary to normalize the elements in the lithogenic component of the sediment against a conservative element to allow changes in the input of the elements to be addressed. In this study we show that Al, which is the lightest element that can be measured using the Itrax XRF-scanner, can be used to effectively normalize the elements of the lithogenic fraction of the sediment against variations in organic content. We also show that care must be taken when choosing resolution and exposure time to ensure optimal output from the measurements.",
keywords = "Lake sediment, Normalization, XRF-scanning",
author = "L. L{\"o}wemark and Chen, {H. F.} and Yang, {T. N.} and M. Kylander and Ein-Fen Yu and Hsu, {Y. W.} and Lee, {T. Q.} and Song, {S. R.} and S. Jarvis",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.06.002",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1250--1256",
journal = "Journal of Asian Earth Sciences",
issn = "1367-9120",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normalizing XRF-scanner data

T2 - A cautionary note on the interpretation of high-resolution records from organic-rich lakes

AU - Löwemark, L.

AU - Chen, H. F.

AU - Yang, T. N.

AU - Kylander, M.

AU - Yu, Ein-Fen

AU - Hsu, Y. W.

AU - Lee, T. Q.

AU - Song, S. R.

AU - Jarvis, S.

PY - 2011/4/2

Y1 - 2011/4/2

N2 - X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanning of unlithified, untreated sediment cores is becoming an increasingly common method used to obtain paleoproxy data from lake records. XRF-scanning is fast and delivers high-resolution records of relative variations in the elemental composition of the sediment. However, lake sediments display extreme variations in their organic matter content, which can vary from just a few percent to well over 50%. As XRF scanners are largely insensitive to organic material in the sediment, increasing levels of organic material effectively dilute those components that can be measured, such as the lithogenic material (the closed-sum effect). Consequently, in sediments with large variations in organic material, the measured variations in an element will to a large extent mirror the changes in organic material. It is therefore necessary to normalize the elements in the lithogenic component of the sediment against a conservative element to allow changes in the input of the elements to be addressed. In this study we show that Al, which is the lightest element that can be measured using the Itrax XRF-scanner, can be used to effectively normalize the elements of the lithogenic fraction of the sediment against variations in organic content. We also show that care must be taken when choosing resolution and exposure time to ensure optimal output from the measurements.

AB - X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanning of unlithified, untreated sediment cores is becoming an increasingly common method used to obtain paleoproxy data from lake records. XRF-scanning is fast and delivers high-resolution records of relative variations in the elemental composition of the sediment. However, lake sediments display extreme variations in their organic matter content, which can vary from just a few percent to well over 50%. As XRF scanners are largely insensitive to organic material in the sediment, increasing levels of organic material effectively dilute those components that can be measured, such as the lithogenic material (the closed-sum effect). Consequently, in sediments with large variations in organic material, the measured variations in an element will to a large extent mirror the changes in organic material. It is therefore necessary to normalize the elements in the lithogenic component of the sediment against a conservative element to allow changes in the input of the elements to be addressed. In this study we show that Al, which is the lightest element that can be measured using the Itrax XRF-scanner, can be used to effectively normalize the elements of the lithogenic fraction of the sediment against variations in organic content. We also show that care must be taken when choosing resolution and exposure time to ensure optimal output from the measurements.

KW - Lake sediment

KW - Normalization

KW - XRF-scanning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952189390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952189390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 1250

EP - 1256

JO - Journal of Asian Earth Sciences

JF - Journal of Asian Earth Sciences

SN - 1367-9120

IS - 6

ER -