TY - JOUR
T1 - Livelihood Implications and Perceptions of Large Scale Investment in Natural Resources for Conservation and Carbon Sequestration
T2 - Empirical Evidence from REDD+ in Vietnam
AU - Bayrak, Mucahid Mustafa
AU - Marafa, Lawal Mohammed
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: This study has been conducted at the Department of Geography and Resource Management of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and it was supported by the Worldwide Universities Network Research Fund titled “Adopting REDD+ for Conservation, Sustainable Community Livelihood and Climate Change Mitigation” in 2013–2014. We also received financial support from the Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, and the University Library, both belonging to Utrecht University, to publish this article in this journal. We thank the three anonymous reviewers and Professor Annelies Zoomers for their invaluable feedback. We also thank Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, and Fauna and Flora International for hosting our research. Special thanks to Tran Nam Tu, Tran Huu Nghi (Tropenbos International) and Dang Thanh Liem (FFI). The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the people mentioned here.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the authors.
PY - 2017/10/5
Y1 - 2017/10/5
N2 - The complex relationship between local development and current large scale investments in natural resources in the Global South for the purpose of conservation and carbon sequestration is not fully understood yet. The Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation programme (REDD+) is an example of such investment. This study examines the livelihood implications and perceptions of REDD+ among indigenous and forest-dependent communities in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. A systems-based livelihood survey has been conducted with two communities affected by REDD+ (n = 102)-Kala Tonggu village (participating in UN-REDD, a multilateral programme) and Hieu commune (participating in a REDD+ project of Fauna and Flora International). The positive effects of REDD+ included: introduction of community-based forest management; shifting power relations in favour of local communities; communities receiving financial benefits for forest monitoring; and positive community perceptions on REDD+. The negative impacts concerned: more restricted access to the natural forest; raising false expectations on the financial benefits of REDD+; increasing risks of food insecurity; exclusion of customary institutions and forest classifications; and lack of livelihood alternatives in dealing with changing socio-ecological conditions. Based on the findings of this study, we argue that REDD+ implementation needs to incorporate the temporality and dynamics of community livelihoods, power relations, and customary and formal socio-ecological systems more comprehensively. This to ultimately achieve inclusive local development and effective conservation of global forest commons.
AB - The complex relationship between local development and current large scale investments in natural resources in the Global South for the purpose of conservation and carbon sequestration is not fully understood yet. The Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation programme (REDD+) is an example of such investment. This study examines the livelihood implications and perceptions of REDD+ among indigenous and forest-dependent communities in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. A systems-based livelihood survey has been conducted with two communities affected by REDD+ (n = 102)-Kala Tonggu village (participating in UN-REDD, a multilateral programme) and Hieu commune (participating in a REDD+ project of Fauna and Flora International). The positive effects of REDD+ included: introduction of community-based forest management; shifting power relations in favour of local communities; communities receiving financial benefits for forest monitoring; and positive community perceptions on REDD+. The negative impacts concerned: more restricted access to the natural forest; raising false expectations on the financial benefits of REDD+; increasing risks of food insecurity; exclusion of customary institutions and forest classifications; and lack of livelihood alternatives in dealing with changing socio-ecological conditions. Based on the findings of this study, we argue that REDD+ implementation needs to incorporate the temporality and dynamics of community livelihoods, power relations, and customary and formal socio-ecological systems more comprehensively. This to ultimately achieve inclusive local development and effective conservation of global forest commons.
KW - Carbon sequestration
KW - Climate action
KW - Forest-dependent livelihood
KW - Global land rush
KW - Livelihood perception
KW - REDD+
KW - Socio-ecological system
KW - Vietnam
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030646674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030646674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/su9101802
DO - 10.3390/su9101802
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85030646674
SN - 2071-1050
VL - 9
JO - Sustainability
JF - Sustainability
IS - 10
M1 - 1802
ER -