TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning to labor or being afraid to labor? An analysis of the high-academic-achievement working-class students and parents’ counter-reproduction attitude in the Taiwanese society
AU - Jheng, Ying Jie
N1 - Funding Information:
www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=26132&ctNode=1310&mp=4 [Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. (2010). The comparison of old and new categories of occupation (sixth edition). Retrieved from http:// www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=26132&ctNode=1310&mp=4] 李文益、黃毅志（2004）。文化資本、社會資本與學生成就的關連性之研究：以臺東師 院為例。臺東大學教育學報，15（2），23-58。 [Li, W.-Y., & Hwang, Y.-J. (2004). The study on relationship among cultural capital, social capital and students’ achievement: An example of National Taitung Teachers College. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 23-58.] 李春定（2010）。勞工階級學生學科成績優異者之背後成因探討（未出版之碩士論 文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。 [Li, C.-D. (2010). A study on the cause of outstanding academic records from the students whose families are considered working class (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Tainan University, Tainan, Taiwan.] 沈姍姍（1992）。英國的綜合中學。載於中國教育學會（主編），二十一世紀的高級中 等教育（頁189-204）。臺北市：臺灣書店。 [Shen, S.-S. (1992). Comprehensive high schools in the United Kingdom. In China Education Society (Ed.), High school education in 21st century (pp. 189-204). Taipei, Taiwan: Taiwan Book Store.] 周新富（2008）。社會階級對子女學業成就的影響：以家庭資源為分析架構。臺灣教育 社會學研究，8（1），1-43。 [Chou, H.-F. (2008). Social class effect on children’ academic achievement: Using family resources as analytic frame. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(1), 1-43.] 林文瑛、王震武（1996）。分流教育的社會效果分析。臺北市：行政院教育改革審議委 員會。 [Lin, W.-Y., & Wang, C.-W. (1996). An analysis of social effect of tracking education. Taipei, Taiwan: The Education Reform Committee, The Executive Yuan.] 林郡雯、張建成（2008）。不同階級國中生之文憑意象的探究。當代教育研究季刊，16 （4），199-235。 [Lin, C.-W., & Chan, C.-C. (2008). Credential images of students from different social classes. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 16(4), 199-235.] 張建成、陳珊華（2006）。生涯管教與行為管教的階級差異：兼論家庭與學校文化的連 續性。教育研究集刊，52（1），129-161。 [Chang, C.-C., & Chen, S.-H. (2006). Social class and career/behavior supervision over children: Reconsidering the cultural continuity between family and school. Bulletin of Educational Research, 52(1), 129-161.] 教育部（2016）。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。取自http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail. php?LevelNo=43 [Ministry of Education. (2016). Project of 12-year compulsory education. Retrieved from http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail.php?LevelNo=43] 陳之昭（1990）。面子心理的理論分析與實際研究。載於楊國樞（主編），中國人的心 理（頁155-237）。臺北市：桂冠。 [Chen, Z.-Z. (1990). Theoretical analysis and empirical study on the psychology of face. In K.-S. Yang (Ed.), Psychology of Chinese people (pp. 155-237). Taipei, Taiwan: Laureate.] 陳怡靖、鄭燿男（2000）。臺灣地區教育階層化之變遷：檢證社會資本論、文化資本論 及財務資本論在臺灣的適用性。國家科學委員會研究彙集：人文與社會科學，13 （3），416-434。 [Chen, Y.-G., & Cheng, J.-N. (2000). The changing of educational stratification in Taiwan area: To explore cultural capital, social capital, and financial capital of fit in Taiwan. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 416-434.] 陳鴻文（2016）。學習落後學生與數學課室文化：中年級教室的民族誌研究（未出版之 博士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮市。 [Chen, H.-W. (2016). Low achievement students and the mathematical classroom culture: An ethnographic research inside a 3rd-grade classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan.] 黃光國（1993）。自我實現與華人社會中的價值變遷。載於楊國樞（主編），中國人的 價值觀—社會科學觀點（頁121-172）。臺北市：桂冠。 [Hwang, K.-K. (1993). Self-actualization and the changing of value in the Chinese society. In K.-S., Yang (Ed.), The value of Chinese people: Perspective from social science (pp. 121-172). Taipei, Taiwan: Laureate.] 黃毅志（1995）。臺灣地區教育機會不平等性之變遷。中國社會學刊，18，243-273。 [Hwang, Y.-J. (1995). The changing of inequality of educational opportunity in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 18, 243-273.] 黃毅志（1997）。職業、階層論與子女管教：論Kohn的理論在台灣的適用性。臺東師院 學報，8，1-26。 [Hwang, Y.-J. (1997). Occupation, education, the parental value and behavior modes: Arguing against the fitness of Kohn’s theory in Taiwan. Journal of National Taitung Teachers College, 8, 1-26.] 黃鴻文（2011）。抗拒乎？拒絕乎？偏差乎？學生文化研究中抗拒概念之誤用與澄清。 教育研究集刊，57（3），123-154。 [Hwang, H.-W. (2011). Is resistance different from rejection or deviance? Clarifying the meaning of resistance in student culture research. Bulletin of Educational Research, 57(3), 123-154.] 葉光輝、楊國樞（1991）。孝道認知結構組型之分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文 及社會科學，1（1），32-51。 [Yeh, K.-H., & Yang, K.-S. (1991). Cognitive-structural patterns of Chinese filial piety. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 32-51.] 蔡佳伶（2016）。能玩就盡量玩！國小五年級學生文化之民族誌研究（未出版之碩士論 文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。 [Tsai, C.-L. (2016). An ethnographic study of student culture among the fifth graders (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.] 蔡淑鈴（1986）。職業地位結構：臺灣地區的變遷研究。載於瞿海源、章英華（主 編），臺灣社會與文化變遷（頁229-351）。臺北市：中央研究院民族學研究所。 [Tsai, S.-L. (1986). Structure of occupational status: Exploring the changes in Taiwan. In H.-Y. Chiu & Y.-H. Chang (Eds.), Social and cultural change in Taiwan (pp. 229-351). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.] 蔡雯琪、李錦旭（2015，10月）。勞工階級的孩子如何成為國小教師：以屏東地區國小 教師為例。南臺灣社會發展學術研討會，國立屏東大學，屏東市。 [Tsai, W.-T., & Li, C.-H. (2015, October). How did working-class kids become elementary school teachers? Examples from Pingtung area. Paper presented at the Conference of Social Development in Southern Taiwan, National Pingtung University, Pingtung, Taiwan.] 薛承泰（1995）。臺灣的地位取得研究：回顧與前瞻。載於章英華、傅仰止、翟海源 （主編），社會調查與分析：社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻（頁357-395）。臺北 市：中央研究院民族群研究所。 [Hsueh, C.-T. (1995). Research of status attainment in Taiwan: Retrospect and prospect. In Y.-H. Chang, Y.-Z. Fu, & H.-Y. Chiu (Eds.), Social survey and analysis: The first interdisciplinary symposium on research methods in the social sciences (pp. 357-395). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.] 譚光鼎（1998）。社會與文化再製理論之評析。教育研究集刊，40，23-50。 [Tan, G.-D. (1998). A critical analysis of theories of social and cultural reproduction. Bulletin of Educational Research, 40, 23-50.] 謝孟穎（2003）。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。教育研究集刊，49 （2），255-287。 [Hsieh, M.-Y. (2003). A study of the relationship between parental socioeconomic backgrounds and students’ academic achievements. Bulletin of Educational Research, 49(2), 255-287.] 鍾明倫（2009）。國中好小子同儕文化研究：Paul Willis「文化創生」理論之應用與評析 （未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。 [Chung, M.-L. (2009). The study on the peer culture of junior high school students: The application, analysis and criticize of the “culture production” theory proposed by Paul Willis (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.] 羅健霖（2015）。不同階級國中生網路使用型態之研究：兼論性別的作用（未出版之博
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - The study aims to examine the application and limitation of P. Willis’s idea of cultural production (or resistance). In this regard, the study, rooted in the social and cultural context of the Taiwanese society, interviews high-academic-achievement working-class students and parents. The results show that, working-class parents and children, influenced by “getting rid of poverty” and “gaining face”, were afraid to labor so as to generate a “counter-reproduction attitude,” and, consequently, emphasized the value of education (including instrumental value and symbolic value). As a result, working-class students appeared to obtain high academic achievement. While Willis’s theory is unable to account for some phenomena in Taiwan, the study, based on the research findings, first, provides some explanations to why working-class parents and students in the Taiwanese society care so much about education; second, it also sheds some light on why working-class students do well academically in school.
AB - The study aims to examine the application and limitation of P. Willis’s idea of cultural production (or resistance). In this regard, the study, rooted in the social and cultural context of the Taiwanese society, interviews high-academic-achievement working-class students and parents. The results show that, working-class parents and children, influenced by “getting rid of poverty” and “gaining face”, were afraid to labor so as to generate a “counter-reproduction attitude,” and, consequently, emphasized the value of education (including instrumental value and symbolic value). As a result, working-class students appeared to obtain high academic achievement. While Willis’s theory is unable to account for some phenomena in Taiwan, the study, based on the research findings, first, provides some explanations to why working-class parents and students in the Taiwanese society care so much about education; second, it also sheds some light on why working-class students do well academically in school.
KW - Counter-reproduction attitude
KW - Cultural production (resistance)
KW - Educational reproduction
KW - Face
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040515220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040515220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3966/102887082017126304002
DO - 10.3966/102887082017126304002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85040515220
SN - 1028-8708
VL - 63
SP - 65
EP - 100
JO - Bulletin of Educational Research
JF - Bulletin of Educational Research
IS - 4
ER -