It is the examinee's IQ

Hsinyi Chen, Tianshu Pan, Jianjun Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In response to the question "Whose IQ is it?" raised by McDermott, Watkins, and Rhoad (2014), this study examined the same concern about assessor bias by applying hierarchical linear modeling to a large and representative standardization sample of 2,200 child records in the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). When differences in child age, gender, ethnicity, parental education level, and some intellectual abilities were cojointly used as covariates to adjust for nonrandom assignment problems, the results revealed that the Level 2 assessor variance was trivial for Full Scale IQ and all WISC-IV scores, ranging from 1%-5%, with the only exception being the Comprehension subtest, which showed a moderate level of between-assessor variance (10%). Evidence shows that WISC-IV scores are valid measures of children's intellectual abilities, with no evidence showing harmful assessor bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1523-1527
Number of pages5
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Wechsler Scales
Intelligence
Education

Keywords

  • Assessor variance
  • Fourth edition (WISC-IV)
  • Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM)
  • Wechsler intelligence scale for children

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

It is the examinee's IQ. / Chen, Hsinyi; Pan, Tianshu; Zhu, Jianjun.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 28, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 1523-1527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, H, Pan, T & Zhu, J 2016, 'It is the examinee's IQ', Psychological Assessment, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1523-1527. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000298
Chen, Hsinyi ; Pan, Tianshu ; Zhu, Jianjun. / It is the examinee's IQ. In: Psychological Assessment. 2016 ; Vol. 28, No. 11. pp. 1523-1527.
@article{6c96dd075e7740a0968df933f5c13da2,
title = "It is the examinee's IQ",
abstract = "In response to the question {"}Whose IQ is it?{"} raised by McDermott, Watkins, and Rhoad (2014), this study examined the same concern about assessor bias by applying hierarchical linear modeling to a large and representative standardization sample of 2,200 child records in the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). When differences in child age, gender, ethnicity, parental education level, and some intellectual abilities were cojointly used as covariates to adjust for nonrandom assignment problems, the results revealed that the Level 2 assessor variance was trivial for Full Scale IQ and all WISC-IV scores, ranging from 1{\%}-5{\%}, with the only exception being the Comprehension subtest, which showed a moderate level of between-assessor variance (10{\%}). Evidence shows that WISC-IV scores are valid measures of children's intellectual abilities, with no evidence showing harmful assessor bias.",
keywords = "Assessor variance, Fourth edition (WISC-IV), Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), Wechsler intelligence scale for children",
author = "Hsinyi Chen and Tianshu Pan and Jianjun Zhu",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pas0000298",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1523--1527",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It is the examinee's IQ

AU - Chen, Hsinyi

AU - Pan, Tianshu

AU - Zhu, Jianjun

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - In response to the question "Whose IQ is it?" raised by McDermott, Watkins, and Rhoad (2014), this study examined the same concern about assessor bias by applying hierarchical linear modeling to a large and representative standardization sample of 2,200 child records in the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). When differences in child age, gender, ethnicity, parental education level, and some intellectual abilities were cojointly used as covariates to adjust for nonrandom assignment problems, the results revealed that the Level 2 assessor variance was trivial for Full Scale IQ and all WISC-IV scores, ranging from 1%-5%, with the only exception being the Comprehension subtest, which showed a moderate level of between-assessor variance (10%). Evidence shows that WISC-IV scores are valid measures of children's intellectual abilities, with no evidence showing harmful assessor bias.

AB - In response to the question "Whose IQ is it?" raised by McDermott, Watkins, and Rhoad (2014), this study examined the same concern about assessor bias by applying hierarchical linear modeling to a large and representative standardization sample of 2,200 child records in the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). When differences in child age, gender, ethnicity, parental education level, and some intellectual abilities were cojointly used as covariates to adjust for nonrandom assignment problems, the results revealed that the Level 2 assessor variance was trivial for Full Scale IQ and all WISC-IV scores, ranging from 1%-5%, with the only exception being the Comprehension subtest, which showed a moderate level of between-assessor variance (10%). Evidence shows that WISC-IV scores are valid measures of children's intellectual abilities, with no evidence showing harmful assessor bias.

KW - Assessor variance

KW - Fourth edition (WISC-IV)

KW - Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM)

KW - Wechsler intelligence scale for children

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957990442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957990442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pas0000298

DO - 10.1037/pas0000298

M3 - Article

C2 - 26882079

AN - SCOPUS:84957990442

VL - 28

SP - 1523

EP - 1527

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 11

ER -