Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running?

Yo Shih, Kuan Lun Lin, Tzyy-Yuang Shiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People have advocated barefoot running, claiming that it is better suited to human nature. Humans usually run barefoot using a forefoot strike and run shod using a heel strike. The striking pattern was thought to be a key factor that contributes to the benefit of barefoot running. The purpose of this study is to use scientific data to prove that the striking pattern is more important than barefoot or shod conditions for runners on running injuries prevention. Twelve habitually male shod runners were recruited to run under four varying conditions: barefoot running with a forefoot strike, barefoot running with a heel strike, shod running with a forefoot strike, and shod running with a heel strike. Kinetic and kinematic data and electromyography signals were recorded during the experiments. The results showed that the lower extremity can gain more compliance when running with a forefoot strike. Habitually shod runners can gain more shock absorption by changing the striking pattern to a forefoot strike when running with shoes and barefoot conditions. Habitually shod runners may be subject to injuries more easily when they run barefoot while maintaining their heel strike pattern. Higher muscle activity in the gastrocnemius was observed when running with a forefoot strike, which may imply a greater training load on the muscle and a tendency for injury.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)490-494
Number of pages5
JournalGait and Posture
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Running
Foot
Heel
Wounds and Injuries
Muscles
Shoes
Electromyography
Biomechanical Phenomena
Compliance
Lower Extremity
Shock

Keywords

  • Barefoot running
  • Electromyography
  • Forefoot strike
  • Ground reaction force
  • Heel strike

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running? / Shih, Yo; Lin, Kuan Lun; Shiang, Tzyy-Yuang.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.07.2013, p. 490-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9927f18e65d549f7979ec148d6e9268c,
title = "Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running?",
abstract = "People have advocated barefoot running, claiming that it is better suited to human nature. Humans usually run barefoot using a forefoot strike and run shod using a heel strike. The striking pattern was thought to be a key factor that contributes to the benefit of barefoot running. The purpose of this study is to use scientific data to prove that the striking pattern is more important than barefoot or shod conditions for runners on running injuries prevention. Twelve habitually male shod runners were recruited to run under four varying conditions: barefoot running with a forefoot strike, barefoot running with a heel strike, shod running with a forefoot strike, and shod running with a heel strike. Kinetic and kinematic data and electromyography signals were recorded during the experiments. The results showed that the lower extremity can gain more compliance when running with a forefoot strike. Habitually shod runners can gain more shock absorption by changing the striking pattern to a forefoot strike when running with shoes and barefoot conditions. Habitually shod runners may be subject to injuries more easily when they run barefoot while maintaining their heel strike pattern. Higher muscle activity in the gastrocnemius was observed when running with a forefoot strike, which may imply a greater training load on the muscle and a tendency for injury.",
keywords = "Barefoot running, Electromyography, Forefoot strike, Ground reaction force, Heel strike",
author = "Yo Shih and Lin, {Kuan Lun} and Tzyy-Yuang Shiang",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.030",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "490--494",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running?

AU - Shih, Yo

AU - Lin, Kuan Lun

AU - Shiang, Tzyy-Yuang

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - People have advocated barefoot running, claiming that it is better suited to human nature. Humans usually run barefoot using a forefoot strike and run shod using a heel strike. The striking pattern was thought to be a key factor that contributes to the benefit of barefoot running. The purpose of this study is to use scientific data to prove that the striking pattern is more important than barefoot or shod conditions for runners on running injuries prevention. Twelve habitually male shod runners were recruited to run under four varying conditions: barefoot running with a forefoot strike, barefoot running with a heel strike, shod running with a forefoot strike, and shod running with a heel strike. Kinetic and kinematic data and electromyography signals were recorded during the experiments. The results showed that the lower extremity can gain more compliance when running with a forefoot strike. Habitually shod runners can gain more shock absorption by changing the striking pattern to a forefoot strike when running with shoes and barefoot conditions. Habitually shod runners may be subject to injuries more easily when they run barefoot while maintaining their heel strike pattern. Higher muscle activity in the gastrocnemius was observed when running with a forefoot strike, which may imply a greater training load on the muscle and a tendency for injury.

AB - People have advocated barefoot running, claiming that it is better suited to human nature. Humans usually run barefoot using a forefoot strike and run shod using a heel strike. The striking pattern was thought to be a key factor that contributes to the benefit of barefoot running. The purpose of this study is to use scientific data to prove that the striking pattern is more important than barefoot or shod conditions for runners on running injuries prevention. Twelve habitually male shod runners were recruited to run under four varying conditions: barefoot running with a forefoot strike, barefoot running with a heel strike, shod running with a forefoot strike, and shod running with a heel strike. Kinetic and kinematic data and electromyography signals were recorded during the experiments. The results showed that the lower extremity can gain more compliance when running with a forefoot strike. Habitually shod runners can gain more shock absorption by changing the striking pattern to a forefoot strike when running with shoes and barefoot conditions. Habitually shod runners may be subject to injuries more easily when they run barefoot while maintaining their heel strike pattern. Higher muscle activity in the gastrocnemius was observed when running with a forefoot strike, which may imply a greater training load on the muscle and a tendency for injury.

KW - Barefoot running

KW - Electromyography

KW - Forefoot strike

KW - Ground reaction force

KW - Heel strike

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880940010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880940010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.030

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 23507028

AN - SCOPUS:84880940010

VL - 38

SP - 490

EP - 494

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 3

ER -