Abstract
A number of previous studies on Chinese relative clauses (RC) have reported conflicting results on processing asymmetry. This study aims to revisit the prevalent debate on whether subject-extracted RCs (SRC) or object-extracted RCs (ORC) are easier to process by using the eye-movement technique. In the current study, the data are analyzed in terms of the gaze duration and regression of eye-movement in three critical areas: head noun, embedded verb, and RC-modifying noun phrase as subject. The results show an ORC preference for the processing of RC structures, which supports the word-order account and the Dependency Locality Theory, and a better cross-clausal integration for SRC, which supports the perspective-shift account. The processing asymmetry in Chinese RCs are discussed under relevant theoretical accounts, such as structure-based, memory-based, and perspective shift accounts. We argue that the findings are associated with the syntactic nature of Chinese (a head-initial language with pre-nominal RCs).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1089-1113 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Journal of Psycholinguistic Research |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 Oct 1 |
Keywords
- Eye-movement
- Mandarin Chinese
- Processing asymmetry
- Relative clauses
- Sentence complexity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Linguistics and Language
- General Psychology