Intentional forgetting might be more effortful than remembering: An ERP study of item-method directed forgetting

Shih kuen Cheng, I. Chun Liu, Jun Ren Lee, Daisy L. Hung, Ovid J.L. Tzeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study recorded ERPs while participants engaged in a procedure that combined semantic priming and item-method directed forgetting, aiming to investigate the issues of whether intentional forgetting demands cognitive efforts and modulates the semantic processing of to-be-remembered (TBR) and to-be-forgotten (TBF) items. Participants made lexical decisions to semantically related or unrelated prime and target words. A Remember/Forget cue, presented between the prime and target, designated the prime as TBR or TBF. When the cues were shown for 500. ms, targets preceded by Forget cues yielded a smaller P200 wave than those preceded by Remember cues. Furthermore, the topography of the N400 effect was different for targets preceded by Remember and Forget cues. The cues did not modulate the ERPs of the targets when they were shown for 1500. ms. Because P200 is sensitive to attention influence and the N400 effect reflects semantic processing, we conclude that forgetting is more effortful than remembering and that the semantic processing is different for TBR and TBF items. Nevertheless, there is a temporal limitation for the Remember/Forget cues to modulate the semantic processing and attentional resources in item-method directed forgetting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-292
Number of pages10
JournalBiological Psychology
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Cues
Semantics

Keywords

  • Directed forgetting
  • ERPs
  • N400
  • P200
  • Semantic priming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Intentional forgetting might be more effortful than remembering : An ERP study of item-method directed forgetting. / Cheng, Shih kuen; Liu, I. Chun; Lee, Jun Ren; Hung, Daisy L.; Tzeng, Ovid J.L.

In: Biological Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 2, 01.02.2012, p. 283-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cheng, Shih kuen ; Liu, I. Chun ; Lee, Jun Ren ; Hung, Daisy L. ; Tzeng, Ovid J.L. / Intentional forgetting might be more effortful than remembering : An ERP study of item-method directed forgetting. In: Biological Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 89, No. 2. pp. 283-292.
@article{25cf02657381423f8d3fd9ccbc66556a,
title = "Intentional forgetting might be more effortful than remembering: An ERP study of item-method directed forgetting",
abstract = "This study recorded ERPs while participants engaged in a procedure that combined semantic priming and item-method directed forgetting, aiming to investigate the issues of whether intentional forgetting demands cognitive efforts and modulates the semantic processing of to-be-remembered (TBR) and to-be-forgotten (TBF) items. Participants made lexical decisions to semantically related or unrelated prime and target words. A Remember/Forget cue, presented between the prime and target, designated the prime as TBR or TBF. When the cues were shown for 500. ms, targets preceded by Forget cues yielded a smaller P200 wave than those preceded by Remember cues. Furthermore, the topography of the N400 effect was different for targets preceded by Remember and Forget cues. The cues did not modulate the ERPs of the targets when they were shown for 1500. ms. Because P200 is sensitive to attention influence and the N400 effect reflects semantic processing, we conclude that forgetting is more effortful than remembering and that the semantic processing is different for TBR and TBF items. Nevertheless, there is a temporal limitation for the Remember/Forget cues to modulate the semantic processing and attentional resources in item-method directed forgetting.",
keywords = "Directed forgetting, ERPs, N400, P200, Semantic priming",
author = "Cheng, {Shih kuen} and Liu, {I. Chun} and Lee, {Jun Ren} and Hung, {Daisy L.} and Tzeng, {Ovid J.L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.019",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "283--292",
journal = "Biological Psychology",
issn = "0019-493X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intentional forgetting might be more effortful than remembering

T2 - An ERP study of item-method directed forgetting

AU - Cheng, Shih kuen

AU - Liu, I. Chun

AU - Lee, Jun Ren

AU - Hung, Daisy L.

AU - Tzeng, Ovid J.L.

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - This study recorded ERPs while participants engaged in a procedure that combined semantic priming and item-method directed forgetting, aiming to investigate the issues of whether intentional forgetting demands cognitive efforts and modulates the semantic processing of to-be-remembered (TBR) and to-be-forgotten (TBF) items. Participants made lexical decisions to semantically related or unrelated prime and target words. A Remember/Forget cue, presented between the prime and target, designated the prime as TBR or TBF. When the cues were shown for 500. ms, targets preceded by Forget cues yielded a smaller P200 wave than those preceded by Remember cues. Furthermore, the topography of the N400 effect was different for targets preceded by Remember and Forget cues. The cues did not modulate the ERPs of the targets when they were shown for 1500. ms. Because P200 is sensitive to attention influence and the N400 effect reflects semantic processing, we conclude that forgetting is more effortful than remembering and that the semantic processing is different for TBR and TBF items. Nevertheless, there is a temporal limitation for the Remember/Forget cues to modulate the semantic processing and attentional resources in item-method directed forgetting.

AB - This study recorded ERPs while participants engaged in a procedure that combined semantic priming and item-method directed forgetting, aiming to investigate the issues of whether intentional forgetting demands cognitive efforts and modulates the semantic processing of to-be-remembered (TBR) and to-be-forgotten (TBF) items. Participants made lexical decisions to semantically related or unrelated prime and target words. A Remember/Forget cue, presented between the prime and target, designated the prime as TBR or TBF. When the cues were shown for 500. ms, targets preceded by Forget cues yielded a smaller P200 wave than those preceded by Remember cues. Furthermore, the topography of the N400 effect was different for targets preceded by Remember and Forget cues. The cues did not modulate the ERPs of the targets when they were shown for 1500. ms. Because P200 is sensitive to attention influence and the N400 effect reflects semantic processing, we conclude that forgetting is more effortful than remembering and that the semantic processing is different for TBR and TBF items. Nevertheless, there is a temporal limitation for the Remember/Forget cues to modulate the semantic processing and attentional resources in item-method directed forgetting.

KW - Directed forgetting

KW - ERPs

KW - N400

KW - P200

KW - Semantic priming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856317723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856317723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 22085678

AN - SCOPUS:84856317723

VL - 89

SP - 283

EP - 292

JO - Biological Psychology

JF - Biological Psychology

SN - 0019-493X

IS - 2

ER -