Instability of the North Pacific subtropical countercurrent

Y. L. Chang, L. Y. Oey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The North Pacific Subtropical Countercurrent (STCC) has a weak eastward velocity near the surface, but the region is populated with eddies. Studies have shown that the STCC is baroclinically unstable with a peak growth rate of 0.015 day-1 in March, and the ~60-day growth time has been used to explain the peak eddy kinetic energy (EKE) in May observed from satellites. It is argued here that this growth time from previously published normal-mode instability analyses is too slow. Growth rates calculated from an initial-value problem without the normal-mode assumption are found to be 1.5 to 2 times faster and at shorter wavelengths, due to the existence of (i) nonmodal solutions and (ii) sea surface temperature front in the mixed layer in winter. At interannual time scales it is shown that because of rapid surface adjustments, the STCC geostrophic shear, hence also the instability growth, is approximately in phase with surface forcing, leading to EKE modulation that peaks approximately 10 months later. However, the EKE can only be partially explained by this mechanism of modulation by baroclinic instability. It is suggested that the unexplained variance may be caused additionally by modulation of the EKE by dissipation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)818-833
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Physical Oceanography
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Mar 1

Fingerprint

countercurrent
eddy
kinetic energy
baroclinic instability
mixed layer
dissipation
sea surface temperature
wavelength
timescale
winter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography

Cite this

Instability of the North Pacific subtropical countercurrent. / Chang, Y. L.; Oey, L. Y.

In: Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.03.2014, p. 818-833.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{14b91815357340e18b7067752a867f15,
title = "Instability of the North Pacific subtropical countercurrent",
abstract = "The North Pacific Subtropical Countercurrent (STCC) has a weak eastward velocity near the surface, but the region is populated with eddies. Studies have shown that the STCC is baroclinically unstable with a peak growth rate of 0.015 day-1 in March, and the ~60-day growth time has been used to explain the peak eddy kinetic energy (EKE) in May observed from satellites. It is argued here that this growth time from previously published normal-mode instability analyses is too slow. Growth rates calculated from an initial-value problem without the normal-mode assumption are found to be 1.5 to 2 times faster and at shorter wavelengths, due to the existence of (i) nonmodal solutions and (ii) sea surface temperature front in the mixed layer in winter. At interannual time scales it is shown that because of rapid surface adjustments, the STCC geostrophic shear, hence also the instability growth, is approximately in phase with surface forcing, leading to EKE modulation that peaks approximately 10 months later. However, the EKE can only be partially explained by this mechanism of modulation by baroclinic instability. It is suggested that the unexplained variance may be caused additionally by modulation of the EKE by dissipation.",
author = "Chang, {Y. L.} and Oey, {L. Y.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/JPO-D-13-0162.1",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "818--833",
journal = "Journal of Physical Oceanography",
issn = "0022-3670",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Instability of the North Pacific subtropical countercurrent

AU - Chang, Y. L.

AU - Oey, L. Y.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - The North Pacific Subtropical Countercurrent (STCC) has a weak eastward velocity near the surface, but the region is populated with eddies. Studies have shown that the STCC is baroclinically unstable with a peak growth rate of 0.015 day-1 in March, and the ~60-day growth time has been used to explain the peak eddy kinetic energy (EKE) in May observed from satellites. It is argued here that this growth time from previously published normal-mode instability analyses is too slow. Growth rates calculated from an initial-value problem without the normal-mode assumption are found to be 1.5 to 2 times faster and at shorter wavelengths, due to the existence of (i) nonmodal solutions and (ii) sea surface temperature front in the mixed layer in winter. At interannual time scales it is shown that because of rapid surface adjustments, the STCC geostrophic shear, hence also the instability growth, is approximately in phase with surface forcing, leading to EKE modulation that peaks approximately 10 months later. However, the EKE can only be partially explained by this mechanism of modulation by baroclinic instability. It is suggested that the unexplained variance may be caused additionally by modulation of the EKE by dissipation.

AB - The North Pacific Subtropical Countercurrent (STCC) has a weak eastward velocity near the surface, but the region is populated with eddies. Studies have shown that the STCC is baroclinically unstable with a peak growth rate of 0.015 day-1 in March, and the ~60-day growth time has been used to explain the peak eddy kinetic energy (EKE) in May observed from satellites. It is argued here that this growth time from previously published normal-mode instability analyses is too slow. Growth rates calculated from an initial-value problem without the normal-mode assumption are found to be 1.5 to 2 times faster and at shorter wavelengths, due to the existence of (i) nonmodal solutions and (ii) sea surface temperature front in the mixed layer in winter. At interannual time scales it is shown that because of rapid surface adjustments, the STCC geostrophic shear, hence also the instability growth, is approximately in phase with surface forcing, leading to EKE modulation that peaks approximately 10 months later. However, the EKE can only be partially explained by this mechanism of modulation by baroclinic instability. It is suggested that the unexplained variance may be caused additionally by modulation of the EKE by dissipation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896870751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896870751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/JPO-D-13-0162.1

DO - 10.1175/JPO-D-13-0162.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84896870751

VL - 44

SP - 818

EP - 833

JO - Journal of Physical Oceanography

JF - Journal of Physical Oceanography

SN - 0022-3670

IS - 3

ER -