Improving amazon-like review systems by considering the credibility and time-decay of public reviews

Bo Chun Wang, Wen Yuan Zhu, Ling-Jyh Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the review system of Amazon.com, which is regarded as one of the most successful e-commerce websites in the world. We believe that the review results provided by Amazon's review system may not be representative of the advertised products because the system does not consider two essential factors, namely the credibility and the time-decay of public reviews. Using a dataset downloaded from Amazon.com, we demonstrate that although the credibility and time-decay issues are very common, they are not handled well by current public review systems. To address the situation, we propose a Review-credibility and Time-decay Based Ranking (RTBR) approach, which improves the Amazon review system by exploiting the credibility and time-decay of reviews posted by the public. We evaluate the proposed scheme against the current Amazon scheme. The results demonstrate that the RTBR scheme is superior to the Amazon scheme because it is more credible and it provides timely review results. Moreover, the scheme is simple and applicable to other Amazon-like review systems in which the reviews are time-stamped and can be evaluated by other users.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)463-472
Number of pages10
JournalInformatica (Ljubljana)
Volume35
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Credibility
Decay
Review
Ranking
Electronic Commerce
Demonstrate
Websites

Keywords

  • Credibility
  • E-commerce
  • Review systems
  • Time-decay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Improving amazon-like review systems by considering the credibility and time-decay of public reviews. / Wang, Bo Chun; Zhu, Wen Yuan; Chen, Ling-Jyh.

In: Informatica (Ljubljana), Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.12.2011, p. 463-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{2b63e4603e11439b9112937c225b64f2,
title = "Improving amazon-like review systems by considering the credibility and time-decay of public reviews",
abstract = "In this study, we investigate the review system of Amazon.com, which is regarded as one of the most successful e-commerce websites in the world. We believe that the review results provided by Amazon's review system may not be representative of the advertised products because the system does not consider two essential factors, namely the credibility and the time-decay of public reviews. Using a dataset downloaded from Amazon.com, we demonstrate that although the credibility and time-decay issues are very common, they are not handled well by current public review systems. To address the situation, we propose a Review-credibility and Time-decay Based Ranking (RTBR) approach, which improves the Amazon review system by exploiting the credibility and time-decay of reviews posted by the public. We evaluate the proposed scheme against the current Amazon scheme. The results demonstrate that the RTBR scheme is superior to the Amazon scheme because it is more credible and it provides timely review results. Moreover, the scheme is simple and applicable to other Amazon-like review systems in which the reviews are time-stamped and can be evaluated by other users.",
keywords = "Credibility, E-commerce, Review systems, Time-decay",
author = "Wang, {Bo Chun} and Zhu, {Wen Yuan} and Ling-Jyh Chen",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "463--472",
journal = "Informatica (Slovenia)",
issn = "0350-5596",
publisher = "Slovene Society Informatika",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving amazon-like review systems by considering the credibility and time-decay of public reviews

AU - Wang, Bo Chun

AU - Zhu, Wen Yuan

AU - Chen, Ling-Jyh

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - In this study, we investigate the review system of Amazon.com, which is regarded as one of the most successful e-commerce websites in the world. We believe that the review results provided by Amazon's review system may not be representative of the advertised products because the system does not consider two essential factors, namely the credibility and the time-decay of public reviews. Using a dataset downloaded from Amazon.com, we demonstrate that although the credibility and time-decay issues are very common, they are not handled well by current public review systems. To address the situation, we propose a Review-credibility and Time-decay Based Ranking (RTBR) approach, which improves the Amazon review system by exploiting the credibility and time-decay of reviews posted by the public. We evaluate the proposed scheme against the current Amazon scheme. The results demonstrate that the RTBR scheme is superior to the Amazon scheme because it is more credible and it provides timely review results. Moreover, the scheme is simple and applicable to other Amazon-like review systems in which the reviews are time-stamped and can be evaluated by other users.

AB - In this study, we investigate the review system of Amazon.com, which is regarded as one of the most successful e-commerce websites in the world. We believe that the review results provided by Amazon's review system may not be representative of the advertised products because the system does not consider two essential factors, namely the credibility and the time-decay of public reviews. Using a dataset downloaded from Amazon.com, we demonstrate that although the credibility and time-decay issues are very common, they are not handled well by current public review systems. To address the situation, we propose a Review-credibility and Time-decay Based Ranking (RTBR) approach, which improves the Amazon review system by exploiting the credibility and time-decay of reviews posted by the public. We evaluate the proposed scheme against the current Amazon scheme. The results demonstrate that the RTBR scheme is superior to the Amazon scheme because it is more credible and it provides timely review results. Moreover, the scheme is simple and applicable to other Amazon-like review systems in which the reviews are time-stamped and can be evaluated by other users.

KW - Credibility

KW - E-commerce

KW - Review systems

KW - Time-decay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855317427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855317427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84855317427

VL - 35

SP - 463

EP - 472

JO - Informatica (Slovenia)

JF - Informatica (Slovenia)

SN - 0350-5596

IS - 4

ER -