Impact of Coping Strategies on Nurses’ Well-Being and Practice

Tony Szu Hsien Lee, Wen Chii Tzeng, Hui Hsun Chiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the mechanisms of coping strategies on nurses’ psychological well-being, practice environments and safety attitudes. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. Structural equation modeling was performed to analyze the results. Five hundred clinical nurses were randomly selected from a large group of 1,500 from a medical center with 1,350 beds in Taipei, Taiwan, from July to October 2015. Self-report questionnaires were administered to measure coping strategies (Brief COPE), psychological well-being (Ryff's Psychological Well-being Scale), nurses’ practice environments (Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index), and safety attitudes (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire). Results: Of the 500 participants who gave written consent, 474 (94.8%) filled out the questionnaire. Results showed that using more approach-oriented coping strategies and fewer avoidant coping strategies was associated with greater psychological well-being. Psychological well-being was directly associated with quality of nurses’ practice environments and safety attitudes. The impact of psychological well-being on safety attitudes was mediated significantly by the quality of the practice environment. The use of approach-oriented coping strategies was significantly predictive of positive psychological well-being, a good practice environment, and good safety attitudes. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: This study found a distinct pathway for the relationships between clinical nurses’ psychological well-being, practice environment, and safety attitudes. Psychological well-being in clinical nurses was higher for those with more approach-oriented coping strategies. Psychological well-being directly impacted safety attitudes, which mediated nurses’ practice environments. The practical implications of the results suggest that interventions designed to promote positive psychological well-being may help improve nurses’ practice environments, which, in turn, may result in better safety attitudes and nursing care outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-204
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Nursing Scholarship
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Nurses
Psychology
Safety
Nursing Care
Taiwan
Self Report
Nursing
Cross-Sectional Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Nurses
  • practice environment
  • psychological well-being
  • safety attitudes
  • stress coping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Impact of Coping Strategies on Nurses’ Well-Being and Practice. / Lee, Tony Szu Hsien; Tzeng, Wen Chii; Chiang, Hui Hsun.

In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 51, No. 2, 01.03.2019, p. 195-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Tony Szu Hsien ; Tzeng, Wen Chii ; Chiang, Hui Hsun. / Impact of Coping Strategies on Nurses’ Well-Being and Practice. In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2019 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 195-204.
@article{cffe818d561248329131d0de4a1fd6bb,
title = "Impact of Coping Strategies on Nurses’ Well-Being and Practice",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine the mechanisms of coping strategies on nurses’ psychological well-being, practice environments and safety attitudes. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. Structural equation modeling was performed to analyze the results. Five hundred clinical nurses were randomly selected from a large group of 1,500 from a medical center with 1,350 beds in Taipei, Taiwan, from July to October 2015. Self-report questionnaires were administered to measure coping strategies (Brief COPE), psychological well-being (Ryff's Psychological Well-being Scale), nurses’ practice environments (Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index), and safety attitudes (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire). Results: Of the 500 participants who gave written consent, 474 (94.8{\%}) filled out the questionnaire. Results showed that using more approach-oriented coping strategies and fewer avoidant coping strategies was associated with greater psychological well-being. Psychological well-being was directly associated with quality of nurses’ practice environments and safety attitudes. The impact of psychological well-being on safety attitudes was mediated significantly by the quality of the practice environment. The use of approach-oriented coping strategies was significantly predictive of positive psychological well-being, a good practice environment, and good safety attitudes. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: This study found a distinct pathway for the relationships between clinical nurses’ psychological well-being, practice environment, and safety attitudes. Psychological well-being in clinical nurses was higher for those with more approach-oriented coping strategies. Psychological well-being directly impacted safety attitudes, which mediated nurses’ practice environments. The practical implications of the results suggest that interventions designed to promote positive psychological well-being may help improve nurses’ practice environments, which, in turn, may result in better safety attitudes and nursing care outcomes.",
keywords = "Nurses, practice environment, psychological well-being, safety attitudes, stress coping",
author = "Lee, {Tony Szu Hsien} and Tzeng, {Wen Chii} and Chiang, {Hui Hsun}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jnu.12467",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "195--204",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Scholarship",
issn = "1527-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Coping Strategies on Nurses’ Well-Being and Practice

AU - Lee, Tony Szu Hsien

AU - Tzeng, Wen Chii

AU - Chiang, Hui Hsun

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Objectives: To examine the mechanisms of coping strategies on nurses’ psychological well-being, practice environments and safety attitudes. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. Structural equation modeling was performed to analyze the results. Five hundred clinical nurses were randomly selected from a large group of 1,500 from a medical center with 1,350 beds in Taipei, Taiwan, from July to October 2015. Self-report questionnaires were administered to measure coping strategies (Brief COPE), psychological well-being (Ryff's Psychological Well-being Scale), nurses’ practice environments (Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index), and safety attitudes (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire). Results: Of the 500 participants who gave written consent, 474 (94.8%) filled out the questionnaire. Results showed that using more approach-oriented coping strategies and fewer avoidant coping strategies was associated with greater psychological well-being. Psychological well-being was directly associated with quality of nurses’ practice environments and safety attitudes. The impact of psychological well-being on safety attitudes was mediated significantly by the quality of the practice environment. The use of approach-oriented coping strategies was significantly predictive of positive psychological well-being, a good practice environment, and good safety attitudes. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: This study found a distinct pathway for the relationships between clinical nurses’ psychological well-being, practice environment, and safety attitudes. Psychological well-being in clinical nurses was higher for those with more approach-oriented coping strategies. Psychological well-being directly impacted safety attitudes, which mediated nurses’ practice environments. The practical implications of the results suggest that interventions designed to promote positive psychological well-being may help improve nurses’ practice environments, which, in turn, may result in better safety attitudes and nursing care outcomes.

AB - Objectives: To examine the mechanisms of coping strategies on nurses’ psychological well-being, practice environments and safety attitudes. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. Structural equation modeling was performed to analyze the results. Five hundred clinical nurses were randomly selected from a large group of 1,500 from a medical center with 1,350 beds in Taipei, Taiwan, from July to October 2015. Self-report questionnaires were administered to measure coping strategies (Brief COPE), psychological well-being (Ryff's Psychological Well-being Scale), nurses’ practice environments (Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index), and safety attitudes (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire). Results: Of the 500 participants who gave written consent, 474 (94.8%) filled out the questionnaire. Results showed that using more approach-oriented coping strategies and fewer avoidant coping strategies was associated with greater psychological well-being. Psychological well-being was directly associated with quality of nurses’ practice environments and safety attitudes. The impact of psychological well-being on safety attitudes was mediated significantly by the quality of the practice environment. The use of approach-oriented coping strategies was significantly predictive of positive psychological well-being, a good practice environment, and good safety attitudes. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: This study found a distinct pathway for the relationships between clinical nurses’ psychological well-being, practice environment, and safety attitudes. Psychological well-being in clinical nurses was higher for those with more approach-oriented coping strategies. Psychological well-being directly impacted safety attitudes, which mediated nurses’ practice environments. The practical implications of the results suggest that interventions designed to promote positive psychological well-being may help improve nurses’ practice environments, which, in turn, may result in better safety attitudes and nursing care outcomes.

KW - Nurses

KW - practice environment

KW - psychological well-being

KW - safety attitudes

KW - stress coping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062355636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062355636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jnu.12467

DO - 10.1111/jnu.12467

M3 - Article

C2 - 30806038

AN - SCOPUS:85062355636

VL - 51

SP - 195

EP - 204

JO - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

JF - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

SN - 1527-6546

IS - 2

ER -