Identifying Taiwanese junior-high school students' mathematics learning profiles and their roles in mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance

Ya Ling Wang, Jyh Chong Liang, Chia Yi Lin, Chin Chung Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conceptions of learning mathematics and their relations to academic self-efficacy and performance have recently received much attention. However, a forced dichotomization of the conceptions of learning and discussing a single conception at a time may provide limited information because students may simultaneously hold multiple conceptions of learning rather than using a dominant one while learning. Accordingly, it would be more comprehensive to characterize students according to several critical conceptions, forming mathematics learning profiles. In so doing, students with a specific profile could be portrayed with an outline of various conceptions of learning mathematics. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the role of students' mathematics learning profiles in terms of three critical conceptions of learning mathematics (learning as preparing for tests, learning as calculating and practicing, and learning as achieving understanding) in their mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance. A total of 422 students were solicited from junior-high schools in Taiwan. The results of the latent profile analysis revealed four learning profiles that were able to characterize students, namely the high-engagement, mixed, passive, and surface-understanding learning profiles. Furthermore, the MANOVA results indicated that students with a high-engagement learning profile displayed the best mean value for mathematics learning self-efficacy, as well as the best academic performance; on the other hand, the students with a passive learning profile showed the lowest mean value for mathematics learning self-efficacy as well as inferior academic performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-101
Number of pages10
JournalLearning and Individual Differences
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Feb 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mathematics
Self Efficacy
self-efficacy
Learning
mathematics
Students
school
learning
performance
student

Keywords

  • Academic performance
  • Conceptions of learning mathematics
  • Latent profile analysis
  • Learning profiles
  • Mathematics learning self-efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{9ec830a016f74733b1dfd47bef484c22,
title = "Identifying Taiwanese junior-high school students' mathematics learning profiles and their roles in mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance",
abstract = "Conceptions of learning mathematics and their relations to academic self-efficacy and performance have recently received much attention. However, a forced dichotomization of the conceptions of learning and discussing a single conception at a time may provide limited information because students may simultaneously hold multiple conceptions of learning rather than using a dominant one while learning. Accordingly, it would be more comprehensive to characterize students according to several critical conceptions, forming mathematics learning profiles. In so doing, students with a specific profile could be portrayed with an outline of various conceptions of learning mathematics. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the role of students' mathematics learning profiles in terms of three critical conceptions of learning mathematics (learning as preparing for tests, learning as calculating and practicing, and learning as achieving understanding) in their mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance. A total of 422 students were solicited from junior-high schools in Taiwan. The results of the latent profile analysis revealed four learning profiles that were able to characterize students, namely the high-engagement, mixed, passive, and surface-understanding learning profiles. Furthermore, the MANOVA results indicated that students with a high-engagement learning profile displayed the best mean value for mathematics learning self-efficacy, as well as the best academic performance; on the other hand, the students with a passive learning profile showed the lowest mean value for mathematics learning self-efficacy as well as inferior academic performance.",
keywords = "Academic performance, Conceptions of learning mathematics, Latent profile analysis, Learning profiles, Mathematics learning self-efficacy",
author = "Wang, {Ya Ling} and Liang, {Jyh Chong} and Lin, {Chia Yi} and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.008",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "92--101",
journal = "Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy",
issn = "1471-2598",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying Taiwanese junior-high school students' mathematics learning profiles and their roles in mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance

AU - Wang, Ya Ling

AU - Liang, Jyh Chong

AU - Lin, Chia Yi

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Conceptions of learning mathematics and their relations to academic self-efficacy and performance have recently received much attention. However, a forced dichotomization of the conceptions of learning and discussing a single conception at a time may provide limited information because students may simultaneously hold multiple conceptions of learning rather than using a dominant one while learning. Accordingly, it would be more comprehensive to characterize students according to several critical conceptions, forming mathematics learning profiles. In so doing, students with a specific profile could be portrayed with an outline of various conceptions of learning mathematics. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the role of students' mathematics learning profiles in terms of three critical conceptions of learning mathematics (learning as preparing for tests, learning as calculating and practicing, and learning as achieving understanding) in their mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance. A total of 422 students were solicited from junior-high schools in Taiwan. The results of the latent profile analysis revealed four learning profiles that were able to characterize students, namely the high-engagement, mixed, passive, and surface-understanding learning profiles. Furthermore, the MANOVA results indicated that students with a high-engagement learning profile displayed the best mean value for mathematics learning self-efficacy, as well as the best academic performance; on the other hand, the students with a passive learning profile showed the lowest mean value for mathematics learning self-efficacy as well as inferior academic performance.

AB - Conceptions of learning mathematics and their relations to academic self-efficacy and performance have recently received much attention. However, a forced dichotomization of the conceptions of learning and discussing a single conception at a time may provide limited information because students may simultaneously hold multiple conceptions of learning rather than using a dominant one while learning. Accordingly, it would be more comprehensive to characterize students according to several critical conceptions, forming mathematics learning profiles. In so doing, students with a specific profile could be portrayed with an outline of various conceptions of learning mathematics. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the role of students' mathematics learning profiles in terms of three critical conceptions of learning mathematics (learning as preparing for tests, learning as calculating and practicing, and learning as achieving understanding) in their mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance. A total of 422 students were solicited from junior-high schools in Taiwan. The results of the latent profile analysis revealed four learning profiles that were able to characterize students, namely the high-engagement, mixed, passive, and surface-understanding learning profiles. Furthermore, the MANOVA results indicated that students with a high-engagement learning profile displayed the best mean value for mathematics learning self-efficacy, as well as the best academic performance; on the other hand, the students with a passive learning profile showed the lowest mean value for mathematics learning self-efficacy as well as inferior academic performance.

KW - Academic performance

KW - Conceptions of learning mathematics

KW - Latent profile analysis

KW - Learning profiles

KW - Mathematics learning self-efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010422772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010422772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85010422772

VL - 54

SP - 92

EP - 101

JO - Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

JF - Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

SN - 1471-2598

ER -