How should the Stroop interference effect be measured? Further evidence from alternative versions of the Stroop task

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study modeled the relationship between the Stroop and the neutral naming times to investigate the mechanism underlying the Stroop interference effect. 95 subjects took six alternative versions of the Stroop task and the naming times in the Stroop and neutral conditions were each averaged across the tasks to arrive at a more general measure of the Stroop and neutral naming times. Regression analysis of these general measures indicated a linear function with a small and nonsignificant intercept and a slope significantly greater than one. This finding is consistent with Chen's 1996 results and supports the hypothesis that the mechanism underlying the Stroop interference is interactive or multiplicative rather than stage-like or additive and that a ratio of Stroop over neutral naming times was psychologically a more appropriate measure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1123-1133
Number of pages11
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume84
Issue number3 PART II
Publication statusPublished - 1997 Jun
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stroop Test
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

How should the Stroop interference effect be measured? Further evidence from alternative versions of the Stroop task. / Chen, Jenn Yeu.

In: Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 84, No. 3 PART II, 06.1997, p. 1123-1133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5532dc8dd1934a6c853a06ea9567128a,
title = "How should the Stroop interference effect be measured? Further evidence from alternative versions of the Stroop task",
abstract = "The present study modeled the relationship between the Stroop and the neutral naming times to investigate the mechanism underlying the Stroop interference effect. 95 subjects took six alternative versions of the Stroop task and the naming times in the Stroop and neutral conditions were each averaged across the tasks to arrive at a more general measure of the Stroop and neutral naming times. Regression analysis of these general measures indicated a linear function with a small and nonsignificant intercept and a slope significantly greater than one. This finding is consistent with Chen's 1996 results and supports the hypothesis that the mechanism underlying the Stroop interference is interactive or multiplicative rather than stage-like or additive and that a ratio of Stroop over neutral naming times was psychologically a more appropriate measure.",
author = "Chen, {Jenn Yeu}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "1123--1133",
journal = "Perceptual and Motor Skills",
issn = "0031-5125",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "3 PART II",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How should the Stroop interference effect be measured? Further evidence from alternative versions of the Stroop task

AU - Chen, Jenn Yeu

PY - 1997/6

Y1 - 1997/6

N2 - The present study modeled the relationship between the Stroop and the neutral naming times to investigate the mechanism underlying the Stroop interference effect. 95 subjects took six alternative versions of the Stroop task and the naming times in the Stroop and neutral conditions were each averaged across the tasks to arrive at a more general measure of the Stroop and neutral naming times. Regression analysis of these general measures indicated a linear function with a small and nonsignificant intercept and a slope significantly greater than one. This finding is consistent with Chen's 1996 results and supports the hypothesis that the mechanism underlying the Stroop interference is interactive or multiplicative rather than stage-like or additive and that a ratio of Stroop over neutral naming times was psychologically a more appropriate measure.

AB - The present study modeled the relationship between the Stroop and the neutral naming times to investigate the mechanism underlying the Stroop interference effect. 95 subjects took six alternative versions of the Stroop task and the naming times in the Stroop and neutral conditions were each averaged across the tasks to arrive at a more general measure of the Stroop and neutral naming times. Regression analysis of these general measures indicated a linear function with a small and nonsignificant intercept and a slope significantly greater than one. This finding is consistent with Chen's 1996 results and supports the hypothesis that the mechanism underlying the Stroop interference is interactive or multiplicative rather than stage-like or additive and that a ratio of Stroop over neutral naming times was psychologically a more appropriate measure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031157662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031157662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9229424

AN - SCOPUS:0031157662

VL - 84

SP - 1123

EP - 1133

JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills

JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills

SN - 0031-5125

IS - 3 PART II

ER -