TY - JOUR
T1 - How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness?
AU - Su, Yu Shan
AU - Tsang, Eric W.K.
AU - Peng, Mike W.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Chia-Shen Chen, Weiru Chen, Hong-Jen Chiu, Irem Demirkan, Greg Dess, Michael Hitt, Chung-Ming Lau, Seung-Hyun Lee, Shige Makino, and Wenpin Tsai for helpful comments on earlier drafts. This research is supported in part by the Fulbright Association, the Taiwan Ministry of Education, and the National Science Foundation (CAREER 0552089). An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Academy of Management (New Orleans, 2004), the AIB/JIBS Research Frontiers Conference (Rotterdam, 2005), Academy of International Business (Indianapolis, 2007), National Taiwan University (2003, 2004), Chinese University of Hong Kong (2006), and University of Texas at Dallas (2007). All views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent those of the sponsoring organizations.
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - How do a firm's internal capabilities and external partnerships contribute to its product and process innovativeness? How do their impacts differ? Based on the theoretical framework of exploitation and exploration, we develop an integrative model linking the impact of both internal capabilities and external partnerships on product and process innovativeness. Survey responses from Taiwanese biotechnology firms indicate that research and development (R&D), marketing, and manufacturing capabilities have different effects on product and process innovativeness. Of the four types of external partnerships, only partnerships with universities and research institutes seem to add value, whereas partnerships with suppliers, customers, and competitors do not contribute to innovativeness. Moreover, marketing capability and customer partnerships have a positive interaction effect on product innovativeness, while manufacturing capability and supplier partnerships have a positive interaction effect on process innovativeness.
AB - How do a firm's internal capabilities and external partnerships contribute to its product and process innovativeness? How do their impacts differ? Based on the theoretical framework of exploitation and exploration, we develop an integrative model linking the impact of both internal capabilities and external partnerships on product and process innovativeness. Survey responses from Taiwanese biotechnology firms indicate that research and development (R&D), marketing, and manufacturing capabilities have different effects on product and process innovativeness. Of the four types of external partnerships, only partnerships with universities and research institutes seem to add value, whereas partnerships with suppliers, customers, and competitors do not contribute to innovativeness. Moreover, marketing capability and customer partnerships have a positive interaction effect on product innovativeness, while manufacturing capability and supplier partnerships have a positive interaction effect on process innovativeness.
KW - Biotechnology industry
KW - External partnership
KW - Internal capability
KW - Process innovation
KW - Product innovation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62149105912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62149105912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3
DO - 10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:62149105912
SN - 0217-4561
VL - 26
SP - 309
EP - 331
JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Management
JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Management
IS - 2
ER -