Hot Cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 Magnesium Alloy

C. J. Huang, Ching-min Cheng, C. P. Chou, F. H. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examined the impact of the number of thermal cycles and augmented strain on hot cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 magnesium alloy. Statistical analyses were performed. Following observation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used for component analysis. Results showed that AI content in magnesium alloy has an effect on hot cracking susceptibility. In addition, the nonequilibrium solidification process produced segregation in AI content, causing higher liquid Mg-alloy rich AI content at grain boundaries, and resulting into liquefied grain boundaries of partially melted zone (PMZ). In summary, under multiple thermal cycles AZ61 produced serious liquation cracking. AZ61 has higher (6 wt%) AI content and produced much liquefied Mg17Al12 at grain boundaries under multiple thermal cycles. The liquefied Mg17Al12 were pulled apart and hot cracks formed at weld metal HAZ due to the augmented strain. Since AZ31 had half the AI content of AZ61, its hot-cracking susceptibility was lower than AZ61. In addition, AZ61 showed longer total crack length (TCL) in one thermal cycle compared to that in three thermal cycles. This phenomenon was possibly due to high-temperature gasification of AI during the welding process, which resulted in lower overall AI content. Consequently, shorter hot cracks exhibited in three thermal cycles. It was found the AI content of AZ31 and AZ61 can be used to assess the hot-cracking susceptibility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-640
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Materials Science and Technology
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Aug 5

Fingerprint

Magnesium alloys
Grain boundaries
Cracks
Heat affected zone
Gasification
Solidification
Hot Temperature
Spectrometers
Welding
Welds
Electron microscopes
Metals
Scanning
Liquids
Temperature

Keywords

  • AZ31
  • AZ61
  • Gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW)
  • Hot-cracking susceptibility
  • Thermal cycles
  • Varestraint test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Metals and Alloys
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

Hot Cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 Magnesium Alloy. / Huang, C. J.; Cheng, Ching-min; Chou, C. P.; Chen, F. H.

In: Journal of Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 27, No. 7, 05.08.2011, p. 633-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, C. J. ; Cheng, Ching-min ; Chou, C. P. ; Chen, F. H. / Hot Cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 Magnesium Alloy. In: Journal of Materials Science and Technology. 2011 ; Vol. 27, No. 7. pp. 633-640.
@article{97ba5d439eb9431b837332b2e019bd3c,
title = "Hot Cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 Magnesium Alloy",
abstract = "This paper examined the impact of the number of thermal cycles and augmented strain on hot cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 magnesium alloy. Statistical analyses were performed. Following observation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used for component analysis. Results showed that AI content in magnesium alloy has an effect on hot cracking susceptibility. In addition, the nonequilibrium solidification process produced segregation in AI content, causing higher liquid Mg-alloy rich AI content at grain boundaries, and resulting into liquefied grain boundaries of partially melted zone (PMZ). In summary, under multiple thermal cycles AZ61 produced serious liquation cracking. AZ61 has higher (6 wt{\%}) AI content and produced much liquefied Mg17Al12 at grain boundaries under multiple thermal cycles. The liquefied Mg17Al12 were pulled apart and hot cracks formed at weld metal HAZ due to the augmented strain. Since AZ31 had half the AI content of AZ61, its hot-cracking susceptibility was lower than AZ61. In addition, AZ61 showed longer total crack length (TCL) in one thermal cycle compared to that in three thermal cycles. This phenomenon was possibly due to high-temperature gasification of AI during the welding process, which resulted in lower overall AI content. Consequently, shorter hot cracks exhibited in three thermal cycles. It was found the AI content of AZ31 and AZ61 can be used to assess the hot-cracking susceptibility.",
keywords = "AZ31, AZ61, Gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), Hot-cracking susceptibility, Thermal cycles, Varestraint test",
author = "Huang, {C. J.} and Ching-min Cheng and Chou, {C. P.} and Chen, {F. H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60118-7",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "633--640",
journal = "Journal of Materials Science and Technology",
issn = "1005-0302",
publisher = "Chinese Society of Metals",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hot Cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 Magnesium Alloy

AU - Huang, C. J.

AU - Cheng, Ching-min

AU - Chou, C. P.

AU - Chen, F. H.

PY - 2011/8/5

Y1 - 2011/8/5

N2 - This paper examined the impact of the number of thermal cycles and augmented strain on hot cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 magnesium alloy. Statistical analyses were performed. Following observation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used for component analysis. Results showed that AI content in magnesium alloy has an effect on hot cracking susceptibility. In addition, the nonequilibrium solidification process produced segregation in AI content, causing higher liquid Mg-alloy rich AI content at grain boundaries, and resulting into liquefied grain boundaries of partially melted zone (PMZ). In summary, under multiple thermal cycles AZ61 produced serious liquation cracking. AZ61 has higher (6 wt%) AI content and produced much liquefied Mg17Al12 at grain boundaries under multiple thermal cycles. The liquefied Mg17Al12 were pulled apart and hot cracks formed at weld metal HAZ due to the augmented strain. Since AZ31 had half the AI content of AZ61, its hot-cracking susceptibility was lower than AZ61. In addition, AZ61 showed longer total crack length (TCL) in one thermal cycle compared to that in three thermal cycles. This phenomenon was possibly due to high-temperature gasification of AI during the welding process, which resulted in lower overall AI content. Consequently, shorter hot cracks exhibited in three thermal cycles. It was found the AI content of AZ31 and AZ61 can be used to assess the hot-cracking susceptibility.

AB - This paper examined the impact of the number of thermal cycles and augmented strain on hot cracking in AZ31 and AZ61 magnesium alloy. Statistical analyses were performed. Following observation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used for component analysis. Results showed that AI content in magnesium alloy has an effect on hot cracking susceptibility. In addition, the nonequilibrium solidification process produced segregation in AI content, causing higher liquid Mg-alloy rich AI content at grain boundaries, and resulting into liquefied grain boundaries of partially melted zone (PMZ). In summary, under multiple thermal cycles AZ61 produced serious liquation cracking. AZ61 has higher (6 wt%) AI content and produced much liquefied Mg17Al12 at grain boundaries under multiple thermal cycles. The liquefied Mg17Al12 were pulled apart and hot cracks formed at weld metal HAZ due to the augmented strain. Since AZ31 had half the AI content of AZ61, its hot-cracking susceptibility was lower than AZ61. In addition, AZ61 showed longer total crack length (TCL) in one thermal cycle compared to that in three thermal cycles. This phenomenon was possibly due to high-temperature gasification of AI during the welding process, which resulted in lower overall AI content. Consequently, shorter hot cracks exhibited in three thermal cycles. It was found the AI content of AZ31 and AZ61 can be used to assess the hot-cracking susceptibility.

KW - AZ31

KW - AZ61

KW - Gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW)

KW - Hot-cracking susceptibility

KW - Thermal cycles

KW - Varestraint test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961003892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961003892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60118-7

DO - 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60118-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79961003892

VL - 27

SP - 633

EP - 640

JO - Journal of Materials Science and Technology

JF - Journal of Materials Science and Technology

SN - 1005-0302

IS - 7

ER -