Gender Differences in Eye Movements in Solving Text-and-Diagram Science Problems

Po Sheng Huang, Hsueh-Chih Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to examine possible gender differences in how junior high school students integrate printed texts and diagrams while solving science problems. We proposed the response style hypothesis and the spatial working memory hypothesis to explain possible gender differences in the integration process. Eye-tracking technique was used to explore these hypotheses. The results of eye-movement indices support the response style hypothesis. Compared to male students, female students spent more time and displayed more fixations in solving science problems. The female students took more time to read the print texts and compare the information between print-based texts and visual-based diagrams more frequently during the problem-solving process than the male students. However, no gender differences were found in the accuracy of their responses to the science problems or their performances in the spatial working memory task. Implications for psychological theory and educational practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-346
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Gender Differences
Eye Movements
gender-specific factors
Diagram
Working Memory
science
female student
Eye Tracking
psychological theory
theory-practice
student
Fixation
educational practice
Integrate
Text
school
performance
Style
time

Keywords

  • Cognitive load
  • Eye movement
  • Response style
  • Spatial working memory
  • Text-diagram integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

Gender Differences in Eye Movements in Solving Text-and-Diagram Science Problems. / Huang, Po Sheng; Chen, Hsueh-Chih.

In: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 14, 01.07.2016, p. 327-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5fc0ec8865c443188b864c474712483c,
title = "Gender Differences in Eye Movements in Solving Text-and-Diagram Science Problems",
abstract = "The main purpose of this study was to examine possible gender differences in how junior high school students integrate printed texts and diagrams while solving science problems. We proposed the response style hypothesis and the spatial working memory hypothesis to explain possible gender differences in the integration process. Eye-tracking technique was used to explore these hypotheses. The results of eye-movement indices support the response style hypothesis. Compared to male students, female students spent more time and displayed more fixations in solving science problems. The female students took more time to read the print texts and compare the information between print-based texts and visual-based diagrams more frequently during the problem-solving process than the male students. However, no gender differences were found in the accuracy of their responses to the science problems or their performances in the spatial working memory task. Implications for psychological theory and educational practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Cognitive load, Eye movement, Response style, Spatial working memory, Text-diagram integration",
author = "Huang, {Po Sheng} and Hsueh-Chih Chen",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10763-015-9644-3",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "327--346",
journal = "International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education",
issn = "1571-0068",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender Differences in Eye Movements in Solving Text-and-Diagram Science Problems

AU - Huang, Po Sheng

AU - Chen, Hsueh-Chih

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - The main purpose of this study was to examine possible gender differences in how junior high school students integrate printed texts and diagrams while solving science problems. We proposed the response style hypothesis and the spatial working memory hypothesis to explain possible gender differences in the integration process. Eye-tracking technique was used to explore these hypotheses. The results of eye-movement indices support the response style hypothesis. Compared to male students, female students spent more time and displayed more fixations in solving science problems. The female students took more time to read the print texts and compare the information between print-based texts and visual-based diagrams more frequently during the problem-solving process than the male students. However, no gender differences were found in the accuracy of their responses to the science problems or their performances in the spatial working memory task. Implications for psychological theory and educational practice are discussed.

AB - The main purpose of this study was to examine possible gender differences in how junior high school students integrate printed texts and diagrams while solving science problems. We proposed the response style hypothesis and the spatial working memory hypothesis to explain possible gender differences in the integration process. Eye-tracking technique was used to explore these hypotheses. The results of eye-movement indices support the response style hypothesis. Compared to male students, female students spent more time and displayed more fixations in solving science problems. The female students took more time to read the print texts and compare the information between print-based texts and visual-based diagrams more frequently during the problem-solving process than the male students. However, no gender differences were found in the accuracy of their responses to the science problems or their performances in the spatial working memory task. Implications for psychological theory and educational practice are discussed.

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Eye movement

KW - Response style

KW - Spatial working memory

KW - Text-diagram integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928389620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928389620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10763-015-9644-3

DO - 10.1007/s10763-015-9644-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928389620

VL - 14

SP - 327

EP - 346

JO - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

JF - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

SN - 1571-0068

ER -