Exploring the underlying constructs of basic concepts in environmental education

Ju Chou, Robert E. Roth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this cross-cultural study, underlying constructs for environmental education were compared using faculty responses from The Ohio State University (OSU) and the National Taiwan University (NTU). A systematic sampling of 120 faculty members each from OSU and NTU was conducted and a Q-sort technique used. Through factor analysis with a varimax rotation on data obtained from each university, two sets of constructs were identified. The following five factors, or constructs, identified by the OSU faculty explained 38.5% of the total variance: Environmental Ethics, Population and Quality of Life, Interdependence, Environmental Management, and Socio-Culture. Five constructs identified by the NTU faculty explained 38.5% of the total variance: Environmental Ethics, Environmental Management, Interdependence, Population and Quality of Life, and Resource Conservation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-43
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Education
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995 Jan 1

Fingerprint

environmental education
basic concept
quality of life
environmental management
environmental ethics
Taiwan
interdependence
factor analysis
sampling
cultural studies
conservation
university
resources
resource conservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Exploring the underlying constructs of basic concepts in environmental education. / Chou, Ju; Roth, Robert E.

In: Journal of Environmental Education, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.01.1995, p. 36-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a61523bb9d94cb6966fb59e247db8d4,
title = "Exploring the underlying constructs of basic concepts in environmental education",
abstract = "In this cross-cultural study, underlying constructs for environmental education were compared using faculty responses from The Ohio State University (OSU) and the National Taiwan University (NTU). A systematic sampling of 120 faculty members each from OSU and NTU was conducted and a Q-sort technique used. Through factor analysis with a varimax rotation on data obtained from each university, two sets of constructs were identified. The following five factors, or constructs, identified by the OSU faculty explained 38.5{\%} of the total variance: Environmental Ethics, Population and Quality of Life, Interdependence, Environmental Management, and Socio-Culture. Five constructs identified by the NTU faculty explained 38.5{\%} of the total variance: Environmental Ethics, Environmental Management, Interdependence, Population and Quality of Life, and Resource Conservation.",
author = "Ju Chou and Roth, {Robert E.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00958964.1995.9941438",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "36--43",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Education",
issn = "0095-8964",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the underlying constructs of basic concepts in environmental education

AU - Chou, Ju

AU - Roth, Robert E.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - In this cross-cultural study, underlying constructs for environmental education were compared using faculty responses from The Ohio State University (OSU) and the National Taiwan University (NTU). A systematic sampling of 120 faculty members each from OSU and NTU was conducted and a Q-sort technique used. Through factor analysis with a varimax rotation on data obtained from each university, two sets of constructs were identified. The following five factors, or constructs, identified by the OSU faculty explained 38.5% of the total variance: Environmental Ethics, Population and Quality of Life, Interdependence, Environmental Management, and Socio-Culture. Five constructs identified by the NTU faculty explained 38.5% of the total variance: Environmental Ethics, Environmental Management, Interdependence, Population and Quality of Life, and Resource Conservation.

AB - In this cross-cultural study, underlying constructs for environmental education were compared using faculty responses from The Ohio State University (OSU) and the National Taiwan University (NTU). A systematic sampling of 120 faculty members each from OSU and NTU was conducted and a Q-sort technique used. Through factor analysis with a varimax rotation on data obtained from each university, two sets of constructs were identified. The following five factors, or constructs, identified by the OSU faculty explained 38.5% of the total variance: Environmental Ethics, Population and Quality of Life, Interdependence, Environmental Management, and Socio-Culture. Five constructs identified by the NTU faculty explained 38.5% of the total variance: Environmental Ethics, Environmental Management, Interdependence, Population and Quality of Life, and Resource Conservation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0008348076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0008348076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00958964.1995.9941438

DO - 10.1080/00958964.1995.9941438

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0008348076

VL - 26

SP - 36

EP - 43

JO - Journal of Environmental Education

JF - Journal of Environmental Education

SN - 0095-8964

IS - 2

ER -