Exploring learners’ beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and their relations with science text understanding

Fang-Ying Yang, Cheng Chieh Chang, Li Ling Chen, Yi Chun Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to explore learners' beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and how these beliefs were associating with their understanding of science texts. About 400 10th graders were involved in the development and validation of the Beliefs about Science Reading Inventory (BSRI). To find the effects of reader beliefs and epistemic beliefs, a new group of 65 10th grade students whose reader and epistemic beliefs were assessed by the newly developed BSRI and an existing SEB questionnaire were invited to take part in a science reading task. Students' text understanding in terms of concept gain and text interpretations was collected and analyzed. By the correlation analysis, it was found that when students had stronger beliefs about meaning construction based on personal goals and experiences (i.e. transaction beliefs), they produced more thematic and critical interpretations of the content of the test article. The regression analysis suggested that students SEBs could predict concept gain as a result of reading. Moreover, among all beliefs examined in the study, transaction beliefs stood out as the best predictor of overall science-text understanding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1591-1606
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jul 2

Fingerprint

science
transaction
student
interpretation
regression analysis
school grade
questionnaire
experience
Group

Keywords

  • Affective domain
  • epistemic beliefs
  • reader beliefs
  • science reading
  • scientific literacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Exploring learners’ beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and their relations with science text understanding. / Yang, Fang-Ying; Chang, Cheng Chieh; Chen, Li Ling; Chen, Yi Chun.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 38, No. 10, 02.07.2016, p. 1591-1606.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b905ad2768fe43478483d2e4eb3650ad,
title = "Exploring learners’ beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and their relations with science text understanding",
abstract = "The main purpose of this study was to explore learners' beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and how these beliefs were associating with their understanding of science texts. About 400 10th graders were involved in the development and validation of the Beliefs about Science Reading Inventory (BSRI). To find the effects of reader beliefs and epistemic beliefs, a new group of 65 10th grade students whose reader and epistemic beliefs were assessed by the newly developed BSRI and an existing SEB questionnaire were invited to take part in a science reading task. Students' text understanding in terms of concept gain and text interpretations was collected and analyzed. By the correlation analysis, it was found that when students had stronger beliefs about meaning construction based on personal goals and experiences (i.e. transaction beliefs), they produced more thematic and critical interpretations of the content of the test article. The regression analysis suggested that students SEBs could predict concept gain as a result of reading. Moreover, among all beliefs examined in the study, transaction beliefs stood out as the best predictor of overall science-text understanding.",
keywords = "Affective domain, epistemic beliefs, reader beliefs, science reading, scientific literacy",
author = "Fang-Ying Yang and Chang, {Cheng Chieh} and Chen, {Li Ling} and Chen, {Yi Chun}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2016.1200763",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1591--1606",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring learners’ beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and their relations with science text understanding

AU - Yang, Fang-Ying

AU - Chang, Cheng Chieh

AU - Chen, Li Ling

AU - Chen, Yi Chun

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - The main purpose of this study was to explore learners' beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and how these beliefs were associating with their understanding of science texts. About 400 10th graders were involved in the development and validation of the Beliefs about Science Reading Inventory (BSRI). To find the effects of reader beliefs and epistemic beliefs, a new group of 65 10th grade students whose reader and epistemic beliefs were assessed by the newly developed BSRI and an existing SEB questionnaire were invited to take part in a science reading task. Students' text understanding in terms of concept gain and text interpretations was collected and analyzed. By the correlation analysis, it was found that when students had stronger beliefs about meaning construction based on personal goals and experiences (i.e. transaction beliefs), they produced more thematic and critical interpretations of the content of the test article. The regression analysis suggested that students SEBs could predict concept gain as a result of reading. Moreover, among all beliefs examined in the study, transaction beliefs stood out as the best predictor of overall science-text understanding.

AB - The main purpose of this study was to explore learners' beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and how these beliefs were associating with their understanding of science texts. About 400 10th graders were involved in the development and validation of the Beliefs about Science Reading Inventory (BSRI). To find the effects of reader beliefs and epistemic beliefs, a new group of 65 10th grade students whose reader and epistemic beliefs were assessed by the newly developed BSRI and an existing SEB questionnaire were invited to take part in a science reading task. Students' text understanding in terms of concept gain and text interpretations was collected and analyzed. By the correlation analysis, it was found that when students had stronger beliefs about meaning construction based on personal goals and experiences (i.e. transaction beliefs), they produced more thematic and critical interpretations of the content of the test article. The regression analysis suggested that students SEBs could predict concept gain as a result of reading. Moreover, among all beliefs examined in the study, transaction beliefs stood out as the best predictor of overall science-text understanding.

KW - Affective domain

KW - epistemic beliefs

KW - reader beliefs

KW - science reading

KW - scientific literacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976339001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976339001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2016.1200763

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2016.1200763

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1591

EP - 1606

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 10

ER -