Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Experts’ successful psychomotor performance was characterized by effective switch of motor and attentional control

  • Kuo Pin Wang
  • , Ming Yang Cheng
  • , Tai Ting Chen
  • , Yu Kai Chang
  • , Chung Ju Huang
  • , Jie Feng
  • , Tsung Min Hung*
  • , Jie Ren
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: This study proposed that Mu (8–13 Hz) and SMR (12–15 Hz) readings in the sensorimotor cortical area can be used to investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying optimal motor performance. Design: This study used a within-subject design. Method: Forty expert golfers were recruited to perform 60 putts while their EEGs were recorded. The putting distance was chosen to ensure that approximately 50% of all putts would be missed so that there was a need for constant adjustments to be made during performance. Successful performance was defined as the ball going in the hole. Results: (a) Lower Mu power in Cz, and alpha power in Pz and Oz were observed for successful performances compared with unsuccessful performances at T1 (−2000 ∼ −1000 ms); (b) Higher SMR power in Cz was observed for successful performances relative to unsuccessful performances at T2 (−1000 ∼ 0 ms). Conclusions: These findings not only support the multi-action plan model (MAP) and the psychomotor efficiency hypothesis, but also reveal the temporal dynamics of the cognitive mechanisms in an optimal-controlled state.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-379
Number of pages6
JournalPsychology of Sport and Exercise
Volume43
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jul

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Cortical activation
  • EEG
  • Sport performance
  • The dual-process theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experts’ successful psychomotor performance was characterized by effective switch of motor and attentional control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this