Evaluation of prior art search methods for Chinese patents

Yuen Hsien Tseng, Tso Liang Kao, James Jeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

patent or currently involving in a patentdecades in various countries. Patent offices of these areas have planned or are about to recruit more patent examiners for dealing with the ever-increasing applications. Before issuing a patent, the examiners need to conduct a prior art search in order to know whether the techniques revealed in the application meet the novelty requirement for a patent. On the other hand, any individual or enterprise, before applying a patent or currently involving in a patent lawsuit case, will also inevitably conduct a prior art search to make sure they will not infringe other's patent rights. Therefore, patent prior art search is a highstake task. Several research activities have been conducted in other countries. However, none has done for traditional Chinese patents. Based on the real-world patent collection, this study compares five models for prior art search, namely manual Boolean search, automatic search, pseudo relevance feedback, true relevance feedback, and human-machine interaction. Evaluated on 24 prior art search items, fully automatic pseudo relevance feedback was found to be able to achieve the effectiveness level of semi-automatic true relevance feedback. In addition, the human-machine interaction based on various terms suggested by the retrieval system performed un-expected low, even worse than the fully automatic models. However, this shows that the automatic retrieval techniques have reached a level that is able to help novice users in promoting their prior art search performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-102
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Educational Media and Library Science
Volume49
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Mar 6

Fingerprint

patent
art
Feedback
evaluation
examiner
Art
Evaluation
Patents
Industry
lawsuit
interaction

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • Interaction
  • Patent
  • Prior art search
  • Relevance feedback
  • Term suggestion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Conservation
  • Information Systems
  • Archaeology
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Evaluation of prior art search methods for Chinese patents. / Tseng, Yuen Hsien; Kao, Tso Liang; Jeng, James.

In: Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, Vol. 49, No. 1, 06.03.2012, p. 75-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f7c6755efbed42d7a7e89aa7b8dc4e36,
title = "Evaluation of prior art search methods for Chinese patents",
abstract = "patent or currently involving in a patentdecades in various countries. Patent offices of these areas have planned or are about to recruit more patent examiners for dealing with the ever-increasing applications. Before issuing a patent, the examiners need to conduct a prior art search in order to know whether the techniques revealed in the application meet the novelty requirement for a patent. On the other hand, any individual or enterprise, before applying a patent or currently involving in a patent lawsuit case, will also inevitably conduct a prior art search to make sure they will not infringe other's patent rights. Therefore, patent prior art search is a highstake task. Several research activities have been conducted in other countries. However, none has done for traditional Chinese patents. Based on the real-world patent collection, this study compares five models for prior art search, namely manual Boolean search, automatic search, pseudo relevance feedback, true relevance feedback, and human-machine interaction. Evaluated on 24 prior art search items, fully automatic pseudo relevance feedback was found to be able to achieve the effectiveness level of semi-automatic true relevance feedback. In addition, the human-machine interaction based on various terms suggested by the retrieval system performed un-expected low, even worse than the fully automatic models. However, this shows that the automatic retrieval techniques have reached a level that is able to help novice users in promoting their prior art search performance.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Interaction, Patent, Prior art search, Relevance feedback, Term suggestion",
author = "Tseng, {Yuen Hsien} and Kao, {Tso Liang} and James Jeng",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "75--102",
journal = "Journal of Educational Media and Library Science",
issn = "1013-090X",
publisher = "淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of prior art search methods for Chinese patents

AU - Tseng, Yuen Hsien

AU - Kao, Tso Liang

AU - Jeng, James

PY - 2012/3/6

Y1 - 2012/3/6

N2 - patent or currently involving in a patentdecades in various countries. Patent offices of these areas have planned or are about to recruit more patent examiners for dealing with the ever-increasing applications. Before issuing a patent, the examiners need to conduct a prior art search in order to know whether the techniques revealed in the application meet the novelty requirement for a patent. On the other hand, any individual or enterprise, before applying a patent or currently involving in a patent lawsuit case, will also inevitably conduct a prior art search to make sure they will not infringe other's patent rights. Therefore, patent prior art search is a highstake task. Several research activities have been conducted in other countries. However, none has done for traditional Chinese patents. Based on the real-world patent collection, this study compares five models for prior art search, namely manual Boolean search, automatic search, pseudo relevance feedback, true relevance feedback, and human-machine interaction. Evaluated on 24 prior art search items, fully automatic pseudo relevance feedback was found to be able to achieve the effectiveness level of semi-automatic true relevance feedback. In addition, the human-machine interaction based on various terms suggested by the retrieval system performed un-expected low, even worse than the fully automatic models. However, this shows that the automatic retrieval techniques have reached a level that is able to help novice users in promoting their prior art search performance.

AB - patent or currently involving in a patentdecades in various countries. Patent offices of these areas have planned or are about to recruit more patent examiners for dealing with the ever-increasing applications. Before issuing a patent, the examiners need to conduct a prior art search in order to know whether the techniques revealed in the application meet the novelty requirement for a patent. On the other hand, any individual or enterprise, before applying a patent or currently involving in a patent lawsuit case, will also inevitably conduct a prior art search to make sure they will not infringe other's patent rights. Therefore, patent prior art search is a highstake task. Several research activities have been conducted in other countries. However, none has done for traditional Chinese patents. Based on the real-world patent collection, this study compares five models for prior art search, namely manual Boolean search, automatic search, pseudo relevance feedback, true relevance feedback, and human-machine interaction. Evaluated on 24 prior art search items, fully automatic pseudo relevance feedback was found to be able to achieve the effectiveness level of semi-automatic true relevance feedback. In addition, the human-machine interaction based on various terms suggested by the retrieval system performed un-expected low, even worse than the fully automatic models. However, this shows that the automatic retrieval techniques have reached a level that is able to help novice users in promoting their prior art search performance.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Interaction

KW - Patent

KW - Prior art search

KW - Relevance feedback

KW - Term suggestion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857677902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857677902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84857677902

VL - 49

SP - 75

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Educational Media and Library Science

JF - Journal of Educational Media and Library Science

SN - 1013-090X

IS - 1

ER -