TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of 8-Day Typhoon Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts in Taiwan by the 2.5-km CReSS Model
T2 - Overall Performance during 2012–16 and Impact of Domain Size
AU - Wang, Chung Chieh
AU - Chien, Chih Wei
AU - Soong, Wei Kuo
AU - Chen, Shin Hau
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Meteorological Society.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - The skill of 24-h daily quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) in Taiwan by a cloud-resolving model out to 8 days was evaluated for 27 typhoons (84 days) during 2012–16. Overall, the skill increased as the lead time shortened, and most of the QPFs were of high quality on both day 1 (0–24 h) and day 2 (24–48 h) with a minimum tendency to over-forecast rainfall. At longer lead times from day 4 (72–96 h) to day 8 (168–192 h), where underforecasting became increas-ingly apparent, decent QPFs that resembled the observation could still be realized if the track errors were small enough due to better quality in the initial and boundary conditions from the global model. For the 14 typhoons that had an ob-served peak daily amount of $350 mm, such QPFs occurred in 10 of them (71%) and the earliest around day 5 on average. Thus, good rainfall scenarios could be provided quite early for many typhoons by this high-resolution system. By compar-ing the QPF results above to those by the 3-day forecasts that used a smaller domain, potential benefits of an enlarged fine domain were assessed. The only major difference occurred on day 1 at the 750-mm threshold, where the threat score (TS) was 0.17 (0.05) using a larger (smaller) domain, contributed only by two typhoons. While this result appeared random, the larger domain simulated the responsible rainband slightly better and had a higher accumulation to produce hits at a key station on both occasions despite a very similar tropical cyclone (TC) track and thus could be beneficial for typhoon QPFs.
AB - The skill of 24-h daily quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) in Taiwan by a cloud-resolving model out to 8 days was evaluated for 27 typhoons (84 days) during 2012–16. Overall, the skill increased as the lead time shortened, and most of the QPFs were of high quality on both day 1 (0–24 h) and day 2 (24–48 h) with a minimum tendency to over-forecast rainfall. At longer lead times from day 4 (72–96 h) to day 8 (168–192 h), where underforecasting became increas-ingly apparent, decent QPFs that resembled the observation could still be realized if the track errors were small enough due to better quality in the initial and boundary conditions from the global model. For the 14 typhoons that had an ob-served peak daily amount of $350 mm, such QPFs occurred in 10 of them (71%) and the earliest around day 5 on average. Thus, good rainfall scenarios could be provided quite early for many typhoons by this high-resolution system. By compar-ing the QPF results above to those by the 3-day forecasts that used a smaller domain, potential benefits of an enlarged fine domain were assessed. The only major difference occurred on day 1 at the 750-mm threshold, where the threat score (TS) was 0.17 (0.05) using a larger (smaller) domain, contributed only by two typhoons. While this result appeared random, the larger domain simulated the responsible rainband slightly better and had a higher accumulation to produce hits at a key station on both occasions despite a very similar tropical cyclone (TC) track and thus could be beneficial for typhoon QPFs.
KW - Cloud resolving models
KW - Ensembles
KW - Mesoscale forecasting
KW - Model evaluation/performance
KW - Precipitation
KW - Tropical cyclones
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85216849224
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85216849224#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1175/JHM-D-24-0052.1
DO - 10.1175/JHM-D-24-0052.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216849224
SN - 1525-755X
VL - 26
SP - 91
EP - 110
JO - Journal of Hydrometeorology
JF - Journal of Hydrometeorology
IS - 1
ER -