Evaluating Proposals for Experiments: An Application of Web-Based Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment

Yao Ting Sung; Chen Shan Lin; Chi Lung Lee; Kuo en Chang

doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06

Evaluating Proposals for Experiments: An Application of Web-Based Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment

Yao Ting Sung, Chen Shan Lin, Chi Lung Lee, Kuo en Chang

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thirty-four undergraduates used Web-based self- and peer-assessment procedures for evaluating proposals in experimental psychology courses. Students presented their proposals and commented on the proposals of others on the Web. Results indicated that proposal observation and peer interaction enhanced the quality of students' proposals. These procedures also enhanced the interrater reliability of within-group members' proposal ratings.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	331-334
Number of pages	4
Journal	Teaching of Psychology
Volume	30
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06
Publication status	Published - 2003 Oct

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Education
General Psychology

Access to Document

10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06

Cite this

@article{6aa99367b47149c8bf0ca8b274626d69,

title = "Evaluating Proposals for Experiments: An Application of Web-Based Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment",

abstract = "Thirty-four undergraduates used Web-based self- and peer-assessment procedures for evaluating proposals in experimental psychology courses. Students presented their proposals and commented on the proposals of others on the Web. Results indicated that proposal observation and peer interaction enhanced the quality of students' proposals. These procedures also enhanced the interrater reliability of within-group members' proposal ratings.",

author = "Sung, {Yao Ting} and Lin, {Chen Shan} and Lee, {Chi Lung} and Chang, {Kuo en}",

year = "2003",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "331--334",

journal = "Teaching of Psychology",

issn = "0098-6283",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating Proposals for Experiments

T2 - An Application of Web-Based Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment

AU - Sung, Yao Ting

AU - Lin, Chen Shan

AU - Lee, Chi Lung

AU - Chang, Kuo en

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - Thirty-four undergraduates used Web-based self- and peer-assessment procedures for evaluating proposals in experimental psychology courses. Students presented their proposals and commented on the proposals of others on the Web. Results indicated that proposal observation and peer interaction enhanced the quality of students' proposals. These procedures also enhanced the interrater reliability of within-group members' proposal ratings.

AB - Thirty-four undergraduates used Web-based self- and peer-assessment procedures for evaluating proposals in experimental psychology courses. Students presented their proposals and commented on the proposals of others on the Web. Results indicated that proposal observation and peer interaction enhanced the quality of students' proposals. These procedures also enhanced the interrater reliability of within-group members' proposal ratings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345581325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345581325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06

DO - 10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0345581325

SN - 0098-6283

VL - 30

SP - 331

EP - 334

JO - Teaching of Psychology

JF - Teaching of Psychology

IS - 4

ER -

Evaluating Proposals for Experiments: An Application of Web-Based Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this