Evaluating Proposals for Experiments: An Application of Web-Based Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment

Yao Ting Sung, Chen Shan Lin, Chi Lung Lee, Kuo en Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thirty-four undergraduates used Web-based self- and peer-assessment procedures for evaluating proposals in experimental psychology courses. Students presented their proposals and commented on the proposals of others on the Web. Results indicated that proposal observation and peer interaction enhanced the quality of students' proposals. These procedures also enhanced the interrater reliability of within-group members' proposal ratings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-334
Number of pages4
JournalTeaching of Psychology
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Oct

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this