Environmental Parasitism Risk and Host Infection Status Affect Patch Use in Foraging Wild Mice

Ching Ho Hou, Pei-Jen Lee, Chun Jui Hsiao, Yu Teh K. Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Foraging host individuals can defend against fecal–orally transmitted parasites by avoiding feces-contaminated patches, which has been widely documented among ungulates. However, it remains unclear whether smaller-sized hosts (e.g., mice), with their high metabolism and constant needs for energy acquisition, can afford the same behavioral strategy. In this study, we used laboratory and field experiments to test whether feces-contaminated patches are avoided by the Taiwan field mice Apodemus semotus. In the laboratory experiment, wild-caught mice whose parasitic infection was not manipulated were given two options to forage from feces-contaminated and uncontaminated patches. These naturally infected mice spent less time in feces-contaminated than uncontaminated patches. In the field experiment, we reduced gastrointestinal parasite load of randomly chosen mice via anthelmintic treatment. Whereas the untreated mice did not discriminate among food patches with different levels of parasitism risk (i.e., high- or low-risk patches containing conspecific feces of high or low parasite egg counts, no-feces patches containing no feces), the treated mice spent less time in feces-contaminated patches than in no-feces patches. Similar to the larger-sized ungulates, we demonstrated here that small mammals can also exhibit fecal-avoidance foraging. Furthermore, such behavior may be influenced by both environmental parasitism risk and host infection status, which has implications in host–parasite transmission dynamics, namely the selective use of uncontaminated patches by the less-infected (treated) mice may drive parasites to aggregate within the infected portion of a host population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)717-725
Number of pages9
JournalEthology
Volume122
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 1

Fingerprint

patch use
parasitism
feces
foraging
mice
infection
parasite
ungulate
ungulates
parasites
parasite intensity
Apodemus
parasite load
parasitoses
small mammal
anthelmintics
small mammals
forage
Taiwan
metabolism

Keywords

  • behavioral defense
  • disease
  • helminth
  • host–parasite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Environmental Parasitism Risk and Host Infection Status Affect Patch Use in Foraging Wild Mice. / Hou, Ching Ho; Lee, Pei-Jen; Hsiao, Chun Jui; Lin, Yu Teh K.

In: Ethology, Vol. 122, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 717-725.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hou, Ching Ho ; Lee, Pei-Jen ; Hsiao, Chun Jui ; Lin, Yu Teh K. / Environmental Parasitism Risk and Host Infection Status Affect Patch Use in Foraging Wild Mice. In: Ethology. 2016 ; Vol. 122, No. 9. pp. 717-725.
@article{a1a3485999c749c49439307e7180b082,
title = "Environmental Parasitism Risk and Host Infection Status Affect Patch Use in Foraging Wild Mice",
abstract = "Foraging host individuals can defend against fecal–orally transmitted parasites by avoiding feces-contaminated patches, which has been widely documented among ungulates. However, it remains unclear whether smaller-sized hosts (e.g., mice), with their high metabolism and constant needs for energy acquisition, can afford the same behavioral strategy. In this study, we used laboratory and field experiments to test whether feces-contaminated patches are avoided by the Taiwan field mice Apodemus semotus. In the laboratory experiment, wild-caught mice whose parasitic infection was not manipulated were given two options to forage from feces-contaminated and uncontaminated patches. These naturally infected mice spent less time in feces-contaminated than uncontaminated patches. In the field experiment, we reduced gastrointestinal parasite load of randomly chosen mice via anthelmintic treatment. Whereas the untreated mice did not discriminate among food patches with different levels of parasitism risk (i.e., high- or low-risk patches containing conspecific feces of high or low parasite egg counts, no-feces patches containing no feces), the treated mice spent less time in feces-contaminated patches than in no-feces patches. Similar to the larger-sized ungulates, we demonstrated here that small mammals can also exhibit fecal-avoidance foraging. Furthermore, such behavior may be influenced by both environmental parasitism risk and host infection status, which has implications in host–parasite transmission dynamics, namely the selective use of uncontaminated patches by the less-infected (treated) mice may drive parasites to aggregate within the infected portion of a host population.",
keywords = "behavioral defense, disease, helminth, host–parasite",
author = "Hou, {Ching Ho} and Pei-Jen Lee and Hsiao, {Chun Jui} and Lin, {Yu Teh K.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/eth.12521",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "717--725",
journal = "Ethology",
issn = "0179-1613",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental Parasitism Risk and Host Infection Status Affect Patch Use in Foraging Wild Mice

AU - Hou, Ching Ho

AU - Lee, Pei-Jen

AU - Hsiao, Chun Jui

AU - Lin, Yu Teh K.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Foraging host individuals can defend against fecal–orally transmitted parasites by avoiding feces-contaminated patches, which has been widely documented among ungulates. However, it remains unclear whether smaller-sized hosts (e.g., mice), with their high metabolism and constant needs for energy acquisition, can afford the same behavioral strategy. In this study, we used laboratory and field experiments to test whether feces-contaminated patches are avoided by the Taiwan field mice Apodemus semotus. In the laboratory experiment, wild-caught mice whose parasitic infection was not manipulated were given two options to forage from feces-contaminated and uncontaminated patches. These naturally infected mice spent less time in feces-contaminated than uncontaminated patches. In the field experiment, we reduced gastrointestinal parasite load of randomly chosen mice via anthelmintic treatment. Whereas the untreated mice did not discriminate among food patches with different levels of parasitism risk (i.e., high- or low-risk patches containing conspecific feces of high or low parasite egg counts, no-feces patches containing no feces), the treated mice spent less time in feces-contaminated patches than in no-feces patches. Similar to the larger-sized ungulates, we demonstrated here that small mammals can also exhibit fecal-avoidance foraging. Furthermore, such behavior may be influenced by both environmental parasitism risk and host infection status, which has implications in host–parasite transmission dynamics, namely the selective use of uncontaminated patches by the less-infected (treated) mice may drive parasites to aggregate within the infected portion of a host population.

AB - Foraging host individuals can defend against fecal–orally transmitted parasites by avoiding feces-contaminated patches, which has been widely documented among ungulates. However, it remains unclear whether smaller-sized hosts (e.g., mice), with their high metabolism and constant needs for energy acquisition, can afford the same behavioral strategy. In this study, we used laboratory and field experiments to test whether feces-contaminated patches are avoided by the Taiwan field mice Apodemus semotus. In the laboratory experiment, wild-caught mice whose parasitic infection was not manipulated were given two options to forage from feces-contaminated and uncontaminated patches. These naturally infected mice spent less time in feces-contaminated than uncontaminated patches. In the field experiment, we reduced gastrointestinal parasite load of randomly chosen mice via anthelmintic treatment. Whereas the untreated mice did not discriminate among food patches with different levels of parasitism risk (i.e., high- or low-risk patches containing conspecific feces of high or low parasite egg counts, no-feces patches containing no feces), the treated mice spent less time in feces-contaminated patches than in no-feces patches. Similar to the larger-sized ungulates, we demonstrated here that small mammals can also exhibit fecal-avoidance foraging. Furthermore, such behavior may be influenced by both environmental parasitism risk and host infection status, which has implications in host–parasite transmission dynamics, namely the selective use of uncontaminated patches by the less-infected (treated) mice may drive parasites to aggregate within the infected portion of a host population.

KW - behavioral defense

KW - disease

KW - helminth

KW - host–parasite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982952337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982952337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/eth.12521

DO - 10.1111/eth.12521

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84982952337

VL - 122

SP - 717

EP - 725

JO - Ethology

JF - Ethology

SN - 0179-1613

IS - 9

ER -