Eliciting Taiwanese high school students’ scientific ontological and epistemic beliefs

Tzung Jin Lin, Chin Chung Tsai*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study employed the interview method to clarify the underlying dimensions of and relationships between students’ scientific ontological and epistemic beliefs. Forty Taiwanese high school students were invited to participate in this study. Through content analysis of the participants’ interview responses two ontological dimensions including ‘status of nature’ and ‘structure of nature’ were identified and found to be associated with each other. The two epistemic dimensions ‘knowledge’ and ‘knowing’ aligned with past literature were also categorised. Besides five pattern variations in terms of the aforementioned four dimensions were recognised based on the students’ philosophical stances on their scientific ontological and epistemic beliefs. According to the Chi-square test results both dimensions of scientific ontological beliefs were significantly related to the two dimensions of scientific epistemic beliefs respectively. In general the students who endorsed a more sophisticated ontological stance regarding the status and structure of nature tended to express a more mature epistemic stance toward scientific knowledge and ways of knowing. The results suggest that the maturation of students’ scientific epistemic beliefs may serve as a precursor and the fundamental step in promoting the sophistication of students’ scientific ontological beliefs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2321-2341
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume39
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Nov 22

Keywords

  • epistemology
  • nature of science
  • secondary/high school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Eliciting Taiwanese high school students’ scientific ontological and epistemic beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this