Effects of shared note-taking and questioning review in elementary school computer classes

Cheng Huan Chen, Chiung-Hui Chiu, Chiu Yi Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A note-taking activity involves two main processes: taking notes and reviewing notes This study investigated the effects of integrating shared note-taking and questioning review (including answering) in elementary school computer classes. A blog platform was adopted and modified to allow students in a group lo create and share notes and questions. Fifty - four students from 2 sixth-grade classes at an elementary school in southern Taiwan comprised the shared-questioning review group of this study. The experiment included 4 units and lasted 4 weeks in total. Each lesson was conducted in a computer classroom by a computer teacher at the participants' school. Students worked in pairs and sat next to each other to take notes individually while listening to a lesson. The students then proposed questions themselves to review the lesson. During the experiment, students could view the notes, questions, and answers of their partner via the blog or computer screen, give comments on the blog, or discuss the notes, questions, and answers with their partner directly. To understand the effects of shared questioning, this study formed another group of 56 students from 2 sixth-grade classes at the same school to engage in a shared note-taking activity without shared-questioning review, but had students read their own notes independently in the review process. Our findings showed that the students in the shared-questioning review group could comprehend 25.80%-37.43% of the ideas presented during the lectures, and could pose comprehensive; questions, but most students answered their questions incompletely. We also found that the quality of students' notes had a significant effectiveness on the quality of the students' questions and answers, and prior knowledge and the quality of students' answers had a significant effectiveness on immediate achievement and retention. However, no significant differences in immediate achievement and retention were found between the shared-questioning review group and the independent note-reading group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-91
Number of pages45
JournalContemporary Educational Research Quarterly
Volume20
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jun 1

Fingerprint

elementary school
student
weblog
Group
experiment
school
Taiwan
classroom

Keywords

  • Elementary school classes
  • Note-taking strategies
  • Shared note-taking
  • Shared-questioning review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Effects of shared note-taking and questioning review in elementary school computer classes. / Chen, Cheng Huan; Chiu, Chiung-Hui; Wu, Chiu Yi.

In: Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 47-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b41be57ca75448a18e6ab2c7b2c2559c,
title = "Effects of shared note-taking and questioning review in elementary school computer classes",
abstract = "A note-taking activity involves two main processes: taking notes and reviewing notes This study investigated the effects of integrating shared note-taking and questioning review (including answering) in elementary school computer classes. A blog platform was adopted and modified to allow students in a group lo create and share notes and questions. Fifty - four students from 2 sixth-grade classes at an elementary school in southern Taiwan comprised the shared-questioning review group of this study. The experiment included 4 units and lasted 4 weeks in total. Each lesson was conducted in a computer classroom by a computer teacher at the participants' school. Students worked in pairs and sat next to each other to take notes individually while listening to a lesson. The students then proposed questions themselves to review the lesson. During the experiment, students could view the notes, questions, and answers of their partner via the blog or computer screen, give comments on the blog, or discuss the notes, questions, and answers with their partner directly. To understand the effects of shared questioning, this study formed another group of 56 students from 2 sixth-grade classes at the same school to engage in a shared note-taking activity without shared-questioning review, but had students read their own notes independently in the review process. Our findings showed that the students in the shared-questioning review group could comprehend 25.80{\%}-37.43{\%} of the ideas presented during the lectures, and could pose comprehensive; questions, but most students answered their questions incompletely. We also found that the quality of students' notes had a significant effectiveness on the quality of the students' questions and answers, and prior knowledge and the quality of students' answers had a significant effectiveness on immediate achievement and retention. However, no significant differences in immediate achievement and retention were found between the shared-questioning review group and the independent note-reading group.",
keywords = "Elementary school classes, Note-taking strategies, Shared note-taking, Shared-questioning review",
author = "Chen, {Cheng Huan} and Chiung-Hui Chiu and Wu, {Chiu Yi}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "47--91",
journal = "Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly",
issn = "1814-4810",
publisher = "國立台灣師範大學教育研究與評鑑中心",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of shared note-taking and questioning review in elementary school computer classes

AU - Chen, Cheng Huan

AU - Chiu, Chiung-Hui

AU - Wu, Chiu Yi

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - A note-taking activity involves two main processes: taking notes and reviewing notes This study investigated the effects of integrating shared note-taking and questioning review (including answering) in elementary school computer classes. A blog platform was adopted and modified to allow students in a group lo create and share notes and questions. Fifty - four students from 2 sixth-grade classes at an elementary school in southern Taiwan comprised the shared-questioning review group of this study. The experiment included 4 units and lasted 4 weeks in total. Each lesson was conducted in a computer classroom by a computer teacher at the participants' school. Students worked in pairs and sat next to each other to take notes individually while listening to a lesson. The students then proposed questions themselves to review the lesson. During the experiment, students could view the notes, questions, and answers of their partner via the blog or computer screen, give comments on the blog, or discuss the notes, questions, and answers with their partner directly. To understand the effects of shared questioning, this study formed another group of 56 students from 2 sixth-grade classes at the same school to engage in a shared note-taking activity without shared-questioning review, but had students read their own notes independently in the review process. Our findings showed that the students in the shared-questioning review group could comprehend 25.80%-37.43% of the ideas presented during the lectures, and could pose comprehensive; questions, but most students answered their questions incompletely. We also found that the quality of students' notes had a significant effectiveness on the quality of the students' questions and answers, and prior knowledge and the quality of students' answers had a significant effectiveness on immediate achievement and retention. However, no significant differences in immediate achievement and retention were found between the shared-questioning review group and the independent note-reading group.

AB - A note-taking activity involves two main processes: taking notes and reviewing notes This study investigated the effects of integrating shared note-taking and questioning review (including answering) in elementary school computer classes. A blog platform was adopted and modified to allow students in a group lo create and share notes and questions. Fifty - four students from 2 sixth-grade classes at an elementary school in southern Taiwan comprised the shared-questioning review group of this study. The experiment included 4 units and lasted 4 weeks in total. Each lesson was conducted in a computer classroom by a computer teacher at the participants' school. Students worked in pairs and sat next to each other to take notes individually while listening to a lesson. The students then proposed questions themselves to review the lesson. During the experiment, students could view the notes, questions, and answers of their partner via the blog or computer screen, give comments on the blog, or discuss the notes, questions, and answers with their partner directly. To understand the effects of shared questioning, this study formed another group of 56 students from 2 sixth-grade classes at the same school to engage in a shared note-taking activity without shared-questioning review, but had students read their own notes independently in the review process. Our findings showed that the students in the shared-questioning review group could comprehend 25.80%-37.43% of the ideas presented during the lectures, and could pose comprehensive; questions, but most students answered their questions incompletely. We also found that the quality of students' notes had a significant effectiveness on the quality of the students' questions and answers, and prior knowledge and the quality of students' answers had a significant effectiveness on immediate achievement and retention. However, no significant differences in immediate achievement and retention were found between the shared-questioning review group and the independent note-reading group.

KW - Elementary school classes

KW - Note-taking strategies

KW - Shared note-taking

KW - Shared-questioning review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865720548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865720548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865720548

VL - 20

SP - 47

EP - 91

JO - Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly

JF - Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly

SN - 1814-4810

IS - 2

ER -