Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation

Chiachieh Tang, Yeu Ting Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Though studies have shown the benefits of oral corrective feedback (CF), there is a paucity of research exploring the potency of indirect written CF. Studies have indicated the need of further research on indirect written CF and teacher comments as a way to encourage L2 learners to be better writers. To this end, this study investigated if indirect coded correction feedback (ICCF) and short affective comments were more effective than ICCF alone in enhancing L2 learners’ writing performance, uptake, and motivation. L2 learner participants (n = 56) received the two aforementioned feedback modes and completed three writing tasks at successive times. Analyses of the writings showed a significant improvement in overall writing performance and learner uptake irrespective of the feedback mode they received. This seems to indicate that adding affective comments to ICCF did not significantly boost L2 learners’ writing; however, further analysis of the participants’ questionnaire data showed that the addition did foster a positive mindset motivating them to take further actions to improve their writing and that the pedagogical potency of ICCF and short affective comments seems to be complementary. Pedagogical implications and applications for how ICCF and short affective teacher comments can impact L2 writing are provided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-40
Number of pages15
JournalAssessing Writing
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

teacher
performance
Corrective Feedback
Affective
L2 Writing
L2 Learners
writer
questionnaire
Written Corrective Feedback
Potency

Keywords

  • Corrective feedback
  • Learner uptake
  • Perceived motivation
  • Teacher comments
  • Writing performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{fc5d898584774a508f22d80b6e148f7e,
title = "Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation",
abstract = "Though studies have shown the benefits of oral corrective feedback (CF), there is a paucity of research exploring the potency of indirect written CF. Studies have indicated the need of further research on indirect written CF and teacher comments as a way to encourage L2 learners to be better writers. To this end, this study investigated if indirect coded correction feedback (ICCF) and short affective comments were more effective than ICCF alone in enhancing L2 learners’ writing performance, uptake, and motivation. L2 learner participants (n = 56) received the two aforementioned feedback modes and completed three writing tasks at successive times. Analyses of the writings showed a significant improvement in overall writing performance and learner uptake irrespective of the feedback mode they received. This seems to indicate that adding affective comments to ICCF did not significantly boost L2 learners’ writing; however, further analysis of the participants’ questionnaire data showed that the addition did foster a positive mindset motivating them to take further actions to improve their writing and that the pedagogical potency of ICCF and short affective comments seems to be complementary. Pedagogical implications and applications for how ICCF and short affective teacher comments can impact L2 writing are provided.",
keywords = "Corrective feedback, Learner uptake, Perceived motivation, Teacher comments, Writing performance",
author = "Chiachieh Tang and Liu, {Yeu Ting}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "26--40",
journal = "Assessing Writing",
issn = "1075-2935",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation

AU - Tang, Chiachieh

AU - Liu, Yeu Ting

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Though studies have shown the benefits of oral corrective feedback (CF), there is a paucity of research exploring the potency of indirect written CF. Studies have indicated the need of further research on indirect written CF and teacher comments as a way to encourage L2 learners to be better writers. To this end, this study investigated if indirect coded correction feedback (ICCF) and short affective comments were more effective than ICCF alone in enhancing L2 learners’ writing performance, uptake, and motivation. L2 learner participants (n = 56) received the two aforementioned feedback modes and completed three writing tasks at successive times. Analyses of the writings showed a significant improvement in overall writing performance and learner uptake irrespective of the feedback mode they received. This seems to indicate that adding affective comments to ICCF did not significantly boost L2 learners’ writing; however, further analysis of the participants’ questionnaire data showed that the addition did foster a positive mindset motivating them to take further actions to improve their writing and that the pedagogical potency of ICCF and short affective comments seems to be complementary. Pedagogical implications and applications for how ICCF and short affective teacher comments can impact L2 writing are provided.

AB - Though studies have shown the benefits of oral corrective feedback (CF), there is a paucity of research exploring the potency of indirect written CF. Studies have indicated the need of further research on indirect written CF and teacher comments as a way to encourage L2 learners to be better writers. To this end, this study investigated if indirect coded correction feedback (ICCF) and short affective comments were more effective than ICCF alone in enhancing L2 learners’ writing performance, uptake, and motivation. L2 learner participants (n = 56) received the two aforementioned feedback modes and completed three writing tasks at successive times. Analyses of the writings showed a significant improvement in overall writing performance and learner uptake irrespective of the feedback mode they received. This seems to indicate that adding affective comments to ICCF did not significantly boost L2 learners’ writing; however, further analysis of the participants’ questionnaire data showed that the addition did foster a positive mindset motivating them to take further actions to improve their writing and that the pedagogical potency of ICCF and short affective comments seems to be complementary. Pedagogical implications and applications for how ICCF and short affective teacher comments can impact L2 writing are provided.

KW - Corrective feedback

KW - Learner uptake

KW - Perceived motivation

KW - Teacher comments

KW - Writing performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039446854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039446854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 26

EP - 40

JO - Assessing Writing

JF - Assessing Writing

SN - 1075-2935

ER -