Dual-Modality Input in Repeated Reading for Foreign Language Learners With Different Learning Styles

Yeu Ting Liu, Andrew Graeme Todd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research into dual-modality theory has long rested on the assumption that presenting input in two modalities leads to better learning outcomes. However, this may not always hold true. This study explored the possible advantages of using dual modality in repeated reading-a pedagogy often used to enhance reading development-for two literacy purposes, second language (L2) reading comprehension and vocabulary development. Furthermore, the study probed whether the efficacy of repeated reading implemented using both dual and single modalities varies according to a learner's preferred learning style (visual, auditory, and balanced). The study found that the participants-foreign language learners of Japanese-did not always exhibit greater reading comprehension and vocabulary gains when repeated reading was implemented using dual-modality input. Indeed, it seems that the efficacy of dual-modality input in repeated reading is contingent on the attentional investment required by the particular form of phonological support; the modality (visual or auditory) learners favor; and, most important, the instructional purpose (comprehension or acquisition). Based on these findings, the article discusses how repeated reading practice should be best implemented vis-à-vis the purposes of L2 reading and vocabulary development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)684-706
Number of pages23
JournalForeign Language Annals
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Dec 1

Fingerprint

foreign language
learning
vocabulary
comprehension
literacy
language

Keywords

  • Dual-modality input
  • L2 reading
  • L2 vocabulary development
  • Repeated reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Dual-Modality Input in Repeated Reading for Foreign Language Learners With Different Learning Styles. / Liu, Yeu Ting; Todd, Andrew Graeme.

In: Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 47, No. 4, 01.12.2014, p. 684-706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0ef2b27d3514806b85b7f18729d6b23,
title = "Dual-Modality Input in Repeated Reading for Foreign Language Learners With Different Learning Styles",
abstract = "Research into dual-modality theory has long rested on the assumption that presenting input in two modalities leads to better learning outcomes. However, this may not always hold true. This study explored the possible advantages of using dual modality in repeated reading-a pedagogy often used to enhance reading development-for two literacy purposes, second language (L2) reading comprehension and vocabulary development. Furthermore, the study probed whether the efficacy of repeated reading implemented using both dual and single modalities varies according to a learner's preferred learning style (visual, auditory, and balanced). The study found that the participants-foreign language learners of Japanese-did not always exhibit greater reading comprehension and vocabulary gains when repeated reading was implemented using dual-modality input. Indeed, it seems that the efficacy of dual-modality input in repeated reading is contingent on the attentional investment required by the particular form of phonological support; the modality (visual or auditory) learners favor; and, most important, the instructional purpose (comprehension or acquisition). Based on these findings, the article discusses how repeated reading practice should be best implemented vis-{\`a}-vis the purposes of L2 reading and vocabulary development.",
keywords = "Dual-modality input, L2 reading, L2 vocabulary development, Repeated reading",
author = "Liu, {Yeu Ting} and Todd, {Andrew Graeme}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/flan.12113",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "684--706",
journal = "Foreign Language Annals",
issn = "0015-718X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual-Modality Input in Repeated Reading for Foreign Language Learners With Different Learning Styles

AU - Liu, Yeu Ting

AU - Todd, Andrew Graeme

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Research into dual-modality theory has long rested on the assumption that presenting input in two modalities leads to better learning outcomes. However, this may not always hold true. This study explored the possible advantages of using dual modality in repeated reading-a pedagogy often used to enhance reading development-for two literacy purposes, second language (L2) reading comprehension and vocabulary development. Furthermore, the study probed whether the efficacy of repeated reading implemented using both dual and single modalities varies according to a learner's preferred learning style (visual, auditory, and balanced). The study found that the participants-foreign language learners of Japanese-did not always exhibit greater reading comprehension and vocabulary gains when repeated reading was implemented using dual-modality input. Indeed, it seems that the efficacy of dual-modality input in repeated reading is contingent on the attentional investment required by the particular form of phonological support; the modality (visual or auditory) learners favor; and, most important, the instructional purpose (comprehension or acquisition). Based on these findings, the article discusses how repeated reading practice should be best implemented vis-à-vis the purposes of L2 reading and vocabulary development.

AB - Research into dual-modality theory has long rested on the assumption that presenting input in two modalities leads to better learning outcomes. However, this may not always hold true. This study explored the possible advantages of using dual modality in repeated reading-a pedagogy often used to enhance reading development-for two literacy purposes, second language (L2) reading comprehension and vocabulary development. Furthermore, the study probed whether the efficacy of repeated reading implemented using both dual and single modalities varies according to a learner's preferred learning style (visual, auditory, and balanced). The study found that the participants-foreign language learners of Japanese-did not always exhibit greater reading comprehension and vocabulary gains when repeated reading was implemented using dual-modality input. Indeed, it seems that the efficacy of dual-modality input in repeated reading is contingent on the attentional investment required by the particular form of phonological support; the modality (visual or auditory) learners favor; and, most important, the instructional purpose (comprehension or acquisition). Based on these findings, the article discusses how repeated reading practice should be best implemented vis-à-vis the purposes of L2 reading and vocabulary development.

KW - Dual-modality input

KW - L2 reading

KW - L2 vocabulary development

KW - Repeated reading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913618040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84913618040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/flan.12113

DO - 10.1111/flan.12113

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84913618040

VL - 47

SP - 684

EP - 706

JO - Foreign Language Annals

JF - Foreign Language Annals

SN - 0015-718X

IS - 4

ER -