Does gratitude always work? Ambivalence over emotional expression inhibits the beneficial effect of gratitude on well-being

Lung Hung Chen, Mei-Yen Chen, Ying Mei Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The psychological benefit of gratitude has been well demonstrated in previous studies. However, when we examined these studies closely, we found that the moderators were rarely investigated, suggesting that further work is needed to explore the boundaries of gratitude In this regard, the authors have proposed that ambivalence over emotional expression might be a potential moderator that would inhibit the beneficial effect of gratitude on well-being. Two studies were conducted to examine our hypothesis. Study 1 consisted of 353 Taiwanese college students who completed the Gratitude Questionnaire-Taiwan version (GQ-T), Ambivalence over Emotional Expression Questionnaire (AEQ), and one question about subjective happiness. We found that ambivalence over emotional expression significantly moderated the effect of gratitude on happiness. To validate our findings in Study 1, 233 Taiwanese college students were recruited for Study 2, and they completed the GQ-T, AEQ, subjective happiness short-form UCLA loneliness scale, as well as the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Both studies demonstrated that ambivalence over emotional expression moderated the relationship between gratitude and well-being indexes. Simply stated, the authors found that across the two independent samples, among students who are high in ambivalence over emotional expression, the beneficial effect of gratitude on subjective happiness was inhibited. However, the moderating pattern for loneliness and depression was contrary to our expectations, indicating that high ambivalence over emotional expression does not inhibit gratitude. Possible explanations and implications for social relationships and emotional expression are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-392
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Psychology
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Happiness
Loneliness
Students
Taiwan
Depression
Epidemiologic Studies
Psychology
Well-being
Emotional Expression
Ambivalence
Gratitude
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Affect trait
  • Altruism
  • Emotional conflicts
  • Positive psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Does gratitude always work? Ambivalence over emotional expression inhibits the beneficial effect of gratitude on well-being. / Chen, Lung Hung; Chen, Mei-Yen; Tsai, Ying Mei.

In: International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 5, 01.10.2012, p. 381-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e28615a05ec48ad86f18d2d7387fa8f,
title = "Does gratitude always work? Ambivalence over emotional expression inhibits the beneficial effect of gratitude on well-being",
abstract = "The psychological benefit of gratitude has been well demonstrated in previous studies. However, when we examined these studies closely, we found that the moderators were rarely investigated, suggesting that further work is needed to explore the boundaries of gratitude In this regard, the authors have proposed that ambivalence over emotional expression might be a potential moderator that would inhibit the beneficial effect of gratitude on well-being. Two studies were conducted to examine our hypothesis. Study 1 consisted of 353 Taiwanese college students who completed the Gratitude Questionnaire-Taiwan version (GQ-T), Ambivalence over Emotional Expression Questionnaire (AEQ), and one question about subjective happiness. We found that ambivalence over emotional expression significantly moderated the effect of gratitude on happiness. To validate our findings in Study 1, 233 Taiwanese college students were recruited for Study 2, and they completed the GQ-T, AEQ, subjective happiness short-form UCLA loneliness scale, as well as the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Both studies demonstrated that ambivalence over emotional expression moderated the relationship between gratitude and well-being indexes. Simply stated, the authors found that across the two independent samples, among students who are high in ambivalence over emotional expression, the beneficial effect of gratitude on subjective happiness was inhibited. However, the moderating pattern for loneliness and depression was contrary to our expectations, indicating that high ambivalence over emotional expression does not inhibit gratitude. Possible explanations and implications for social relationships and emotional expression are discussed.",
keywords = "Affect trait, Altruism, Emotional conflicts, Positive psychology",
author = "Chen, {Lung Hung} and Mei-Yen Chen and Tsai, {Ying Mei}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00207594.2011.632009",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "381--392",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0020-7594",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does gratitude always work? Ambivalence over emotional expression inhibits the beneficial effect of gratitude on well-being

AU - Chen, Lung Hung

AU - Chen, Mei-Yen

AU - Tsai, Ying Mei

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - The psychological benefit of gratitude has been well demonstrated in previous studies. However, when we examined these studies closely, we found that the moderators were rarely investigated, suggesting that further work is needed to explore the boundaries of gratitude In this regard, the authors have proposed that ambivalence over emotional expression might be a potential moderator that would inhibit the beneficial effect of gratitude on well-being. Two studies were conducted to examine our hypothesis. Study 1 consisted of 353 Taiwanese college students who completed the Gratitude Questionnaire-Taiwan version (GQ-T), Ambivalence over Emotional Expression Questionnaire (AEQ), and one question about subjective happiness. We found that ambivalence over emotional expression significantly moderated the effect of gratitude on happiness. To validate our findings in Study 1, 233 Taiwanese college students were recruited for Study 2, and they completed the GQ-T, AEQ, subjective happiness short-form UCLA loneliness scale, as well as the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Both studies demonstrated that ambivalence over emotional expression moderated the relationship between gratitude and well-being indexes. Simply stated, the authors found that across the two independent samples, among students who are high in ambivalence over emotional expression, the beneficial effect of gratitude on subjective happiness was inhibited. However, the moderating pattern for loneliness and depression was contrary to our expectations, indicating that high ambivalence over emotional expression does not inhibit gratitude. Possible explanations and implications for social relationships and emotional expression are discussed.

AB - The psychological benefit of gratitude has been well demonstrated in previous studies. However, when we examined these studies closely, we found that the moderators were rarely investigated, suggesting that further work is needed to explore the boundaries of gratitude In this regard, the authors have proposed that ambivalence over emotional expression might be a potential moderator that would inhibit the beneficial effect of gratitude on well-being. Two studies were conducted to examine our hypothesis. Study 1 consisted of 353 Taiwanese college students who completed the Gratitude Questionnaire-Taiwan version (GQ-T), Ambivalence over Emotional Expression Questionnaire (AEQ), and one question about subjective happiness. We found that ambivalence over emotional expression significantly moderated the effect of gratitude on happiness. To validate our findings in Study 1, 233 Taiwanese college students were recruited for Study 2, and they completed the GQ-T, AEQ, subjective happiness short-form UCLA loneliness scale, as well as the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Both studies demonstrated that ambivalence over emotional expression moderated the relationship between gratitude and well-being indexes. Simply stated, the authors found that across the two independent samples, among students who are high in ambivalence over emotional expression, the beneficial effect of gratitude on subjective happiness was inhibited. However, the moderating pattern for loneliness and depression was contrary to our expectations, indicating that high ambivalence over emotional expression does not inhibit gratitude. Possible explanations and implications for social relationships and emotional expression are discussed.

KW - Affect trait

KW - Altruism

KW - Emotional conflicts

KW - Positive psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867266576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867266576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00207594.2011.632009

DO - 10.1080/00207594.2011.632009

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 381

EP - 392

JO - International Journal of Psychology

JF - International Journal of Psychology

SN - 0020-7594

IS - 5

ER -