Different truths in different worlds

Kent D. Miller, Shu Jou Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Models of organizational learning typically assume that organizations rely upon performance feedback and that an exogenous (uncontrollable) environment presents the problems that organizations seek to solve. By contrast, we consider how different epistemologies within organizations, or combinations of epistemologies, and the degree to which the environment is amenable to organizational control jointly affect learning over time. This study presents three different epistemologies expressed in interpersonal learning: pragmatism (learning beliefs from better performers), coherentism (learning beliefs that fit together), and conformism (adopting beliefs that are popular). We also examine the learning implications of a dominant coalition that can promulgate its preferred beliefs throughout an organization. Outcomes from our agent-based model point toward key epistemological and environmental contingencies affecting the dynamics of organizational learning. Organizations filled with pragmatists learn effectively if the environment is fixed or controllable. Coherentists and conformists advance in knowledge only to the extent that they can control the environment. Adding pragmatists to organizations with coherentists or conformists produces a nonlinear (S-shaped) effect on knowledge achieved as different proportions of pragmatists alter social networks. Models involving learning from a dominant coalition affirm March's trade-off between learning speed and eventual knowledge achieved only for organizations filled with pragmatists and operating in an uncontrollable environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-114
Number of pages18
JournalOrganization Science
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Feedback
Epistemology
Organizational learning
Proportion
Performance feedback
Agent-based model
Social networks
Learning model
Conformism
Organizational control
Pragmatism
Contingency
Trade-offs

Keywords

  • Agent-based model
  • Computer simulation
  • Epistemology
  • Ontology
  • Organizational learning
  • Social construction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Different truths in different worlds. / Miller, Kent D.; Lin, Shu Jou.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 97-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Kent D. ; Lin, Shu Jou. / Different truths in different worlds. In: Organization Science. 2010 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 97-114.
@article{07c936374bf745ea997b9af851afd69f,
title = "Different truths in different worlds",
abstract = "Models of organizational learning typically assume that organizations rely upon performance feedback and that an exogenous (uncontrollable) environment presents the problems that organizations seek to solve. By contrast, we consider how different epistemologies within organizations, or combinations of epistemologies, and the degree to which the environment is amenable to organizational control jointly affect learning over time. This study presents three different epistemologies expressed in interpersonal learning: pragmatism (learning beliefs from better performers), coherentism (learning beliefs that fit together), and conformism (adopting beliefs that are popular). We also examine the learning implications of a dominant coalition that can promulgate its preferred beliefs throughout an organization. Outcomes from our agent-based model point toward key epistemological and environmental contingencies affecting the dynamics of organizational learning. Organizations filled with pragmatists learn effectively if the environment is fixed or controllable. Coherentists and conformists advance in knowledge only to the extent that they can control the environment. Adding pragmatists to organizations with coherentists or conformists produces a nonlinear (S-shaped) effect on knowledge achieved as different proportions of pragmatists alter social networks. Models involving learning from a dominant coalition affirm March's trade-off between learning speed and eventual knowledge achieved only for organizations filled with pragmatists and operating in an uncontrollable environment.",
keywords = "Agent-based model, Computer simulation, Epistemology, Ontology, Organizational learning, Social construction",
author = "Miller, {Kent D.} and Lin, {Shu Jou}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.1080.0409",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "97--114",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different truths in different worlds

AU - Miller, Kent D.

AU - Lin, Shu Jou

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Models of organizational learning typically assume that organizations rely upon performance feedback and that an exogenous (uncontrollable) environment presents the problems that organizations seek to solve. By contrast, we consider how different epistemologies within organizations, or combinations of epistemologies, and the degree to which the environment is amenable to organizational control jointly affect learning over time. This study presents three different epistemologies expressed in interpersonal learning: pragmatism (learning beliefs from better performers), coherentism (learning beliefs that fit together), and conformism (adopting beliefs that are popular). We also examine the learning implications of a dominant coalition that can promulgate its preferred beliefs throughout an organization. Outcomes from our agent-based model point toward key epistemological and environmental contingencies affecting the dynamics of organizational learning. Organizations filled with pragmatists learn effectively if the environment is fixed or controllable. Coherentists and conformists advance in knowledge only to the extent that they can control the environment. Adding pragmatists to organizations with coherentists or conformists produces a nonlinear (S-shaped) effect on knowledge achieved as different proportions of pragmatists alter social networks. Models involving learning from a dominant coalition affirm March's trade-off between learning speed and eventual knowledge achieved only for organizations filled with pragmatists and operating in an uncontrollable environment.

AB - Models of organizational learning typically assume that organizations rely upon performance feedback and that an exogenous (uncontrollable) environment presents the problems that organizations seek to solve. By contrast, we consider how different epistemologies within organizations, or combinations of epistemologies, and the degree to which the environment is amenable to organizational control jointly affect learning over time. This study presents three different epistemologies expressed in interpersonal learning: pragmatism (learning beliefs from better performers), coherentism (learning beliefs that fit together), and conformism (adopting beliefs that are popular). We also examine the learning implications of a dominant coalition that can promulgate its preferred beliefs throughout an organization. Outcomes from our agent-based model point toward key epistemological and environmental contingencies affecting the dynamics of organizational learning. Organizations filled with pragmatists learn effectively if the environment is fixed or controllable. Coherentists and conformists advance in knowledge only to the extent that they can control the environment. Adding pragmatists to organizations with coherentists or conformists produces a nonlinear (S-shaped) effect on knowledge achieved as different proportions of pragmatists alter social networks. Models involving learning from a dominant coalition affirm March's trade-off between learning speed and eventual knowledge achieved only for organizations filled with pragmatists and operating in an uncontrollable environment.

KW - Agent-based model

KW - Computer simulation

KW - Epistemology

KW - Ontology

KW - Organizational learning

KW - Social construction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953694560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953694560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.1080.0409

DO - 10.1287/orsc.1080.0409

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953694560

VL - 21

SP - 97

EP - 114

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 1

ER -