Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dialogic Reading before Age Two: Developmental Trajectories and Links to Language Skills

  • Ming Yean Sia
  • , Ovid J.L. Tzeng
  • , Shinmin Wang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This longitudinal study investigated the developmental trajectory of parental dialogic reading (DR) strategies—prompt, evaluate, expand, repeat—before children’s second birthday, and their predictive value for later language outcomes using standardized language assessments. Sixty-six parent-child dyads were followed longitudinally and observed during shared reading at home when children were 6, 12, 18, and 24 months old. A clear developmental progression in DR practices was identified, with distinct patterns for each practice and considerable variability across parents. Prompt appeared as early as 6 months and increased steadily over time, evaluate emerged notably by 12 months, while expand and repeat became prominent from 18 months onward. In addition, repeat at both 12 and 18 months significantly predicted language outcomes measured six months later. Evaluate at 18 months robustly predicted language outcomes at 24 and 36 months. Expand at 18 and 24 months also predicted language skills measured six months later. These findings highlight the feasibility and variability of early DR practices, their role in supporting language development before age two and the importance of assessing baseline DR strategies when designing interventions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEarly Childhood Education Journal
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2026

Keywords

  • Dialogic reading
  • Infants
  • Language development
  • Parent-child interaction
  • Toddlers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dialogic Reading before Age Two: Developmental Trajectories and Links to Language Skills'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this