TY - JOUR
T1 - Detecting Misspecified Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Common Fit Indices
T2 - A Monte Carlo Study
AU - Hsu, Hsien Yuan
AU - Kwok, Oi man
AU - Lin, Jr Huang
AU - Acosta, Sandra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2015/3/4
Y1 - 2015/3/4
N2 - This study investigated the sensitivity of common fit indices (i.e., RMSEA, CFI, TLI, SRMR-W, and SRMR-B) for detecting misspecified multilevel SEMs. The design factors for the Monte Carlo study were numbers of groups in between-group models (100, 150, and 300), group size (10, 20, 30, and 60), intra-class correlation (low, medium, and high), and the types of model misspecification (Simple and Complex). The simulation results showed that CFI, TLI, and RMSEA could only identify the misspecification in the within-group model. Additionally, CFI, TLI, and RMSEA were more sensitive to misspecification in pattern coefficients while SRMR-W was more sensitive to misspecification in factor covariance. Moreover, TLI outperformed both CFI and RMSEA in terms of the hit rates of detecting the within-group misspecification in factor covariance. On the other hand, SRMR-B was the only fit index sensitive to misspecification in the between-group model and more sensitive to misspecification in factor covariance than misspecification in pattern coefficients. Finally, we found that the influence of ICC on the performance of targeted fit indices was trivial.
AB - This study investigated the sensitivity of common fit indices (i.e., RMSEA, CFI, TLI, SRMR-W, and SRMR-B) for detecting misspecified multilevel SEMs. The design factors for the Monte Carlo study were numbers of groups in between-group models (100, 150, and 300), group size (10, 20, 30, and 60), intra-class correlation (low, medium, and high), and the types of model misspecification (Simple and Complex). The simulation results showed that CFI, TLI, and RMSEA could only identify the misspecification in the within-group model. Additionally, CFI, TLI, and RMSEA were more sensitive to misspecification in pattern coefficients while SRMR-W was more sensitive to misspecification in factor covariance. Moreover, TLI outperformed both CFI and RMSEA in terms of the hit rates of detecting the within-group misspecification in factor covariance. On the other hand, SRMR-B was the only fit index sensitive to misspecification in the between-group model and more sensitive to misspecification in factor covariance than misspecification in pattern coefficients. Finally, we found that the influence of ICC on the performance of targeted fit indices was trivial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928266411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928266411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00273171.2014.977429
DO - 10.1080/00273171.2014.977429
M3 - Article
C2 - 26609878
AN - SCOPUS:84928266411
SN - 0027-3171
VL - 50
SP - 197
EP - 215
JO - Multivariate Behavioral Research
JF - Multivariate Behavioral Research
IS - 2
ER -