Abstract
Hurdle count models are used to examine the participation and consumption decisions in Chinese medicine use. Motivated by a household production model, a second censoring mechanism is introduced into existing single-hurdle models, and the resulting specification accommodates conscientious abstainers, as well as economic non-consumers, and admits excessive zeros in the sample. In contrast to previous studies that found few predictors, empirical results based on a Taiwanese national sample suggest that Western medicine is a gross substitute to Chinese medicine, and both time price and money price play more important roles than income. Insurance, lifestyle and demographics also determine the use of Chinese medicine.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 221-232 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Health Economics |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Chinese medicine
- Count data
- Excessive zeros
- Two-part model
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy