Abstract
Hurdle count models are used to examine the participation and consumption decisions in Chinese medicine use. Motivated by a household production model, a second censoring mechanism is introduced into existing single-hurdle models, and the resulting specification accommodates conscientious abstainers, as well as economic non-consumers, and admits excessive zeros in the sample. In contrast to previous studies that found few predictors, empirical results based on a Taiwanese national sample suggest that Western medicine is a gross substitute to Chinese medicine, and both time price and money price play more important roles than income. Insurance, lifestyle and demographics also determine the use of Chinese medicine.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 221-232 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Health Economics |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2001 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Chinese medicine
- Count data
- Excessive zeros
- Two-part model
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy